Identificador persistente para citar o vincular este elemento: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/70577
Campo DC Valoridioma
dc.contributor.authorSánchez Cuervo, Margarita Esther-
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-28T17:16:29Z-
dc.date.available2020-02-28T17:16:29Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.issn1572-8668-
dc.identifier.otherWoS-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10553/70577-
dc.description.abstractThis article proposes a rhetorical analysis of ‘‘A Terribly Sensitive Mind’’, an essay by Virginia Woolf that reviews Katherine Mansfield’s diary and praises her figure after her death. The argumentative nature of Woolf’s essay can be assessed following a rhetorical model of analysis in which I examine (1) the inventive level (inventio), related to the generation of arguments; (2) the dispositive level (dispositio), concerned with a specific arrangement of ideas devised to gain the audience’s adherence; and (3) the elocutive level (elocutio), traditionally associated with the recognition of stylistic features such as rhetorical figures. The interaction among inventive, dispositive, and elocutive elements allows the identification of first-order effects in the form of arguments and rhetorical figures that can come together and result in an interpretation of presence. This form of presence can help to explain why ‘‘A Terribly Sensitive Mind’’ is expressive.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofNeophilologus-
dc.sourceNeophilologus [1572-8668], v. 99 (2), pp. 335-349-
dc.subject6202 Teoría, análisis y crítica literarias-
dc.subject.otherVirginia Woolf-
dc.subject.otherEssay-
dc.subject.otherRhetorical analysis-
dc.subject.otherRhetorical figure-
dc.subject.otherArgument-
dc.subject.otherPresence-
dc.title"Katherine Mansfield about Katherine Mansfield”: Rhetorical Analysis of Virginia Woolf’s ‘A Terribly Sensitive Mind-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doidoi.org/10.1007/s11061-014-9417-1-
dc.identifier.scopus84925507848-
dc.identifier.isi000351295900012-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11061-014-9417-1-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid56414807400-
dc.identifier.eissn1572-8668-
dc.description.lastpage349-
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.description.firstpage335-
dc.relation.volume99-
dc.investigacionArtes y Humanidades-
dc.type2Artículo-
dc.contributor.daisngid8077511-
dc.description.numberofpages15-
dc.utils.revision-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Cuervo, MES-
dc.date.coverdateEnero 2015-
dc.identifier.ulpgces
dc.description.sjr0,157
dc.description.sjrqQ2
dc.description.ahciAHCI
dc.description.erihplusERIH PLUS
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextCon texto completo-
crisitem.author.deptGIR Discourse, Communication and Society-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Filología Moderna, Traducción e Interpretación-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-5562-8837-
crisitem.author.parentorgDepartamento de Filología Moderna, Traducción e Interpretación-
crisitem.author.fullNameSánchez Cuervo, Margarita Esther-
Colección:Artículos
miniatura
Adobe PDF (220,92 kB)
Vista resumida

Google ScholarTM

Verifica

Altmetric


Comparte



Exporta metadatos



Los elementos en ULPGC accedaCRIS están protegidos por derechos de autor con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.