Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/70096
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMartínez-Alarcón, Lauraen_US
dc.contributor.authorRíos, Antonioen_US
dc.contributor.authorRamis, Guillermoen_US
dc.contributor.authorGómez-Laguna, Jaimeen_US
dc.contributor.authorMoll, Xavieren_US
dc.contributor.authorFalceto, Victoriaen_US
dc.contributor.authorSan Román-Acaso, Fidelen_US
dc.contributor.authorSan Román-Llorens, Fidelen_US
dc.contributor.authorQuereda, Juan Joséen_US
dc.contributor.authorHerrero Medrano, Juan Manuelen_US
dc.contributor.authorMendonça, Liviaen_US
dc.contributor.authorMartín Barrasa, José Luisen_US
dc.contributor.authorFernández, Olga Maríaen_US
dc.contributor.authorMuñoz, Antonioen_US
dc.contributor.authorRamírez, Pabloen_US
dc.contributor.authorParrilla, Pascualen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-05T12:52:23Z-
dc.date.available2020-02-05T12:52:23Z-
dc.date.issued2019en_US
dc.identifier.issn0041-1345en_US
dc.identifier.otherScopus-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10553/70096-
dc.description.abstractVeterinarians often are involved in transplantation research projects. They are a fundamental social group who can influence public opinion about organ donation and transplantation (ODT). Objective. The objective was to determine the knowledge of Spanish veterinary students about the concept of brain death and the law of presumed consent. Methods: A sociologic, multicenter, and observational study was carried out in the veterinary students enrolled in Spain (n = 9000) in a complete academic year. A sample of 2815 students was stratified by geographic area and academic year. The students’ attitudes on the psychosocial aspects of ODT were evaluated using a psychosocial validated questionnaire (PCID-DTO Rios). It was self-administered and completed anonymously. Veterinary schools were randomly selected. The questionnaire was applied to each academic year at compulsory sessions. Statistical analysis: Student t test, χ2 test, and logistic regression analysis were used. Results: The completion rate was 91% (n = 2558). Of students, 66% (n = 1664) understood the concept of brain death, 30% had doubts, whereas 5% believed that a person with brain death can recover and lead a normal life. Concerning legislation, 63% (n = 1615) were against the law of presumed consent, and 37% were in favor. An analysis of variables determining more favorable acceptance of the law showed that year of study (P = .000), knowing a donor (P = .020), and attitude toward ODT (P = .000) did have an effect on acceptance. Most students, 71% (n = 1875), were interested in attending a talk about ODT. Conclusion: Only 37% of Spanish veterinary students would accept the law of presumed consent. Most students were interested in attending an informative talk about ODT.en_US
dc.languagespaen_US
dc.relation.ispartofTransplantation Proceedingsen_US
dc.sourceTransplantation Proceedings [ISSN 0041-1345], v. 51 (9), p. 3004-3007en_US
dc.subject3109 Ciencias veterinariasen_US
dc.subject241208 Trasplante de órganosen_US
dc.subject.otherOrgan donation and transplantation (ODT)en_US
dc.subject.otherVeterinary studentsen_US
dc.titleVeterinary Spanish Students’ Attitude Toward Presumed Consent in Organ Donationen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.transproceed.2019.08.018en_US
dc.identifier.scopus85074669759-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid16310027300-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid57190002254-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid19235779700-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid12780391800-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid56377531800-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid57195732999-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid57201276909-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid56819007400-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid35079290800-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid36910109500-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid36911494200-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid6506508811-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid10439036700-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid7401864461-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid7103197251-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid7102261808-
dc.description.lastpage3007-
dc.identifier.issue9-
dc.description.firstpage3004-
dc.relation.volume51-
dc.investigacionCiencias de la Saluden_US
dc.type2Artículoen_US
dc.utils.revisionen_US
dc.identifier.ulpgces
dc.description.sjr0,363
dc.description.jcr0,784
dc.description.sjrqQ3
dc.description.jcrqQ4
dc.description.scieSCIE
item.fulltextSin texto completo-
item.grantfulltextnone-
crisitem.author.deptGIR IUSA-ONE HEALTH 2.-Sanidad Animal de la Acuicultura y Especies Silvestres, Enfermedades Infecciosas y Seguridad Alimentaria-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Sanidad Animal y Seguridad Alimentaria-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Patología Animal, Producción Animal, Bromatología y Tecnología de Los Alimentos-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-3280-9838-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Sanidad Animal y Seguridad Alimentaria-
crisitem.author.fullNameMartín Barrasa, José Luis-
Appears in Collections:Artículos
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

1
checked on Jan 22, 2023

Page view(s)

60
checked on Jan 28, 2023

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Share



Export metadata



Items in accedaCRIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.