Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/69537
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorGelado Caballero, María Dolores-
dc.contributor.advisorCarpizo Ituarte, Eugenio de Jesús-
dc.contributor.authorMuñoz Entrena, Sandra-
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-31T12:00:56Z-
dc.date.available2020-01-31T12:00:56Z-
dc.date.issued2019en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10553/69537-
dc.description.abstractThe general observation that organisms are adapted to their environment lies at the foundation of biology (Yokota et al, 2002). The evolutionary and ecological framework implies to the organism a suite of adaptative responses (biochemical, physiological, behavioural) which together enable it to survive and to reproduce within a particular set of environmental conditions (Yokota et al, 2002). Marine coastal habitats are characterized by high environmental variability. It is believed that, due to adaptation or acclimation to natural environmental variability, intertidal species may have some capacity to recover from future changes (Yokota et al, 2002). Urchins are considered keystone species in ecosystems as their Aristotle’s lantern is adapted for biting, tearing and scrasping and can even function to grab the substrate. They are herbivores although, some of them, in particular situations they behave like omnivores. The regular echinoids seem to have the widest spectrum of food types included soft-bodied organisms (plant and animals), hard surfaces (rock with incrusting or boring plants and animals) or hard animals (corals and bivalves), and soft substrate. The present study focuses on evaluating the effects of three different diets (the giant kelp, Macrocystis pyrifera, a formulated food and combination of both) on the growth of two species of juvenile sea urchin (Lytechinus pictus and Arbacia stellata). Both species are inhabitants of the Pacific coast of Baja California, with A. Stellata increasing their range extension to the north, due to the more common presence of warmer ocean waters in front of Baja California. For this purpose, measurements of weight and size of the organisms, were made every 15 days for three months. Aditionally, temperature, pH, oxygen, sea water flow and behavior of the sea urchins were monitored. In the present study we use M. pyrifera, since is an abundant natural food resource in Baja California used by different species of sea urchins. We also used a formulated mircoencaspulated diet because was expected to have a positive effect on the growth of sea urchins in captivity. Knowing the growth response to different diets of these common especies in Baja California, will help us to conduct future studies to understand its posible interaction in the ocean and predict posible impacts of the increasing presence of A. Stellata along the coast of Baja California.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.subject240119 Zoología marinaen_US
dc.subject.otherSea urchinsen_US
dc.subject.otherArbacia stellataen_US
dc.subject.otherLytechinus pictusen_US
dc.titleGrowth of juveniles of two species of sea urchins under three different dietsen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorthesises
dc.typeBachelorThesises
dc.contributor.facultadFacultad de Ciencias del Maren_US
dc.investigacionCienciasen_US
dc.type2Trabajo final de gradoen_US
dc.utils.revisionen_US
item.fulltextCon texto completo-
item.grantfulltextopen-
Appears in Collections:Trabajo final de grado
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
0764234_00000_0000.pdfPDF2,91 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record
Recommend this item

Page view(s)

35
checked on Feb 22, 2020

Download(s)

11
checked on Feb 22, 2020

Google ScholarTM

Check




SHARE



Items in accedaCRIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.