Identificador persistente para citar o vincular este elemento: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/52236
Campo DC Valoridioma
dc.contributor.authorRuiz Reyes, Antonioen_US
dc.contributor.authorMolina Caballero, José Manuelen_US
dc.contributor.authorGonzález, Jorgeen_US
dc.contributor.authorMartínez Moreno, Francisco Javieren_US
dc.contributor.authorGutiérrez, Pedro Nolascoen_US
dc.contributor.authorMartínez Moreno, Álvaroen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-25T18:35:27Z-
dc.date.available2018-11-25T18:35:27Z-
dc.date.issued2003en_US
dc.identifier.issn0928-4249en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10553/52236-
dc.description.abstractThe use of cysteine proteinases from Fasciola hepatica adult flukes for the serodiagnosis of caprine fasciolosis by means of an indirect ELISA test was studied. Two proteolytic fractions from adult fluke homogenates, with apparent molecular weights of 28 and 34 kDa ( P28 and P34 respectively), were characterised as cysteine proteinases using azocasein assays and gelatin gel analysis. Both P28 and P34 fractions were electroluted and used as antigens in two different indirect ELISA tests. Serum IgG levels against P28 and P34 in goats given an experimental primary infection with 200 metacercariae or in goats given two experimental infections with 200 metacercariae were determined and compared with those observed in an uninfected control group. ELISA tests using both cysteine proteases showed a rapid and consistent detection of specific IgG in all experimentally infected goats. The IgG response to P28 was the first to be detected as early as 2 - 3 weeks post-infection and remained elevated throughout the experiment. The response to P34 was detected later ( 4 - 6 wpi) and disappeared in some animals at 18 wpi, while flukes were still present in the bile ducts. No significant differences were observed between the anti-P28 and anti-P34 IgG responses between animals receiving a primary or a challenge infection. The results of our study, although preliminary, are promising since the P28 ELISA described here may be a reliable method for the immunodiagnosis of F. hepatica infection in goats.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisher0928-4249
dc.relation.ispartofVeterinary Researchen_US
dc.sourceVeterinary Research[ISSN 0928-4249],v. 34, p. 435-443en_US
dc.subject.otherHaemonchus-Contortusen_US
dc.subject.otherAntibody-Responseen_US
dc.subject.otherImmune-Responseen_US
dc.subject.otherImmunodiagnosisen_US
dc.subject.otherCattleen_US
dc.subject.otherAntigensen_US
dc.subject.otherWormsen_US
dc.subject.otherImmunoassayen_US
dc.subject.otherDiagnosisen_US
dc.subject.otherProteaseen_US
dc.titleHumoral response (IgG) of goats experimentally infected with Fasciola hepatica against cysteine proteinase of adult flukeen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/Articleen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1051/vetres:2003016en_US
dc.identifier.scopus0141515238-
dc.identifier.isi000184713700007-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid57201387360-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid55731962600-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid7404492965-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid6603383525-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid7103382287-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid15725365500-
dc.description.lastpage443en_US
dc.description.firstpage435en_US
dc.relation.volume34en_US
dc.investigacionCiencias de la Saluden_US
dc.type2Artículoen_US
dc.contributor.daisngid2119141-
dc.contributor.daisngid742292-
dc.contributor.daisngid1988579-
dc.contributor.daisngid31450330-
dc.contributor.daisngid30520089-
dc.contributor.daisngid984836-
dc.utils.revisionen_US
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Ruiz, A-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Molina, JM-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Gonzalez, J-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Martinez-Moreno, FJ-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Gutierrez, PN-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Martinez-Moreno, A-
dc.date.coverdateJulio 2003en_US
dc.identifier.ulpgcen_US
dc.contributor.buulpgcBU-VETen_US
dc.description.jcr1,609
dc.description.jcrqQ1
dc.description.scieSCIE
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextSin texto completo-
crisitem.author.deptGIR Parasitología, dermatologia y biopatologia veterinaria-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Patología Animal, Producción Animal, Bromatología y Tecnología de Los Alimentos-
crisitem.author.deptGIR Parasitología, dermatologia y biopatologia veterinaria-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Patología Animal, Producción Animal, Bromatología y Tecnología de Los Alimentos-
crisitem.author.deptGIR IUSA-ONEHEALTH 4. Producción y Biotecnología Animal-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Sanidad Animal y Seguridad Alimentaria-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Patología Animal, Producción Animal, Bromatología y Tecnología de Los Alimentos-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-0668-5496-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-8338-2512-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-7374-9256-
crisitem.author.parentorgDepartamento de Patología Animal, Producción Animal, Bromatología y Tecnología de Los Alimentos-
crisitem.author.parentorgDepartamento de Patología Animal, Producción Animal, Bromatología y Tecnología de Los Alimentos-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Sanidad Animal y Seguridad Alimentaria-
crisitem.author.fullNameRuiz Reyes, Antonio-
crisitem.author.fullNameMolina Caballero, José Manuel-
crisitem.author.fullNameGonzález Pérez, Jorge Francisco-
Colección:Artículos
Vista resumida

Citas SCOPUSTM   

13
actualizado el 17-nov-2024

Citas de WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

12
actualizado el 17-nov-2024

Visitas

89
actualizado el 21-sep-2024

Google ScholarTM

Verifica

Altmetric


Comparte



Exporta metadatos



Los elementos en ULPGC accedaCRIS están protegidos por derechos de autor con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.