Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/51555
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorÁlamo, Desirée
dc.contributor.authorBatista, Miguel
dc.contributor.authorGonzález, Fernando
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez, Noemí
dc.contributor.authorCruz, Guadalupe
dc.contributor.authorCabrera, Fernando
dc.contributor.authorGracia, Anselmo
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-25T01:39:30Z-
dc.date.available2018-11-25T01:39:30Z-
dc.date.issued2005
dc.identifier.issn0093-691X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10553/51555-
dc.description.abstractThis experimental work was carried out to validate the use of a -152 degrees C ultra-low temperature freezer to freeze and store canine semen. The semen of three dogs was pooled and processed to obtain a final dilution with a concentration of 100 x 10(6) spermatozoa/mL, glycerol at 5% and Equex at 0.5%. Then, four freezing protocols were tested to evaluate the cryosurvival of sperm at 1, 7, 30, 60 and 120 days after freezing: (I) semen was frozen and stored in liquid nitrogen; (11) semen was frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored in the ultra-low freezer at -152 degrees C; (III) semen was frozen in the vapour of liquid nitrogen and stored in the ultra-low freezer at -152 degrees C; (IV) semen was frozen and stored in the ultra-low freezer at -152 degrees C. Data were statistically analyzed by repeated measures analysis of variance to determine the effect of the freezing protocol and time on the sperm characteristics assessed. The percentages of sperm motility and of dead/live spermatozoa were similar throughout the experimental period, with no significant differences (P < 0.05) to be observed between four different freezing techniques tested. At 120 days after freezing, the percentage of abnormal cells and the percentage of sperm cells with abnormal acrosome were not significantly different between the freezing techniques. Although the number of dogs used was slightly low, in vitro results of this preliminary study showed that the use of ultra-freezers at -152 degrees C to freeze and store canine semen could be a viable alternative to liquid nitrogen. (c) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
dc.publisher0093-691X
dc.relation.ispartofTheriogenology
dc.sourceTheriogenology[ISSN 0093-691X],v. 63, p. 72-82
dc.subject.otherCanine Spermatozoa
dc.subject.otherIntrauterine Insemination
dc.subject.otherPostthaw Survival
dc.subject.other3 Extenders
dc.subject.otherFrozen
dc.subject.otherFresh
dc.subject.otherPregnancy
dc.subject.otherLongevity
dc.subject.otherMotility
dc.subject.otherDilution
dc.titleCryopreservation of semen in the dog: Use of ultra-freezers of -152°C as a viable alternative to liquid nitrogen
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/Articlees
dc.typeArticlees
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.theriogenology.2004.03.016
dc.identifier.scopus10344265022
dc.identifier.isi000227694300006
dc.contributor.authorscopusid6507009446
dc.contributor.authorscopusid6506315360
dc.contributor.authorscopusid57194243767
dc.contributor.authorscopusid55421309300
dc.contributor.authorscopusid7006161122
dc.contributor.authorscopusid7006639324
dc.contributor.authorscopusid7006185082
dc.description.lastpage82
dc.description.firstpage72
dc.relation.volume63
dc.type2Artículoes
dc.contributor.daisngid1791005
dc.contributor.daisngid30341669
dc.contributor.daisngid3001453
dc.contributor.daisngid3664569
dc.contributor.daisngid23223307
dc.contributor.daisngid2128761
dc.contributor.daisngid7908263
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Alamo, D
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Batista, M
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Gonzalez, F
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Rodriguez, N
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Cruz, G
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Cabrera, F
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Gracia, A
dc.date.coverdateEnero 2005
dc.identifier.ulpgces
dc.description.jcr2,161
dc.description.jcrqQ1
dc.description.scieSCIE
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextSin texto completo-
crisitem.author.deptGIR IUIBS: Medicina Veterinaria e Investigación Terapéutica-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Investigaciones Biomédicas y Sanitarias-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Patología Animal, Producción Animal, Bromatología y Tecnología de Los Alimentos-
crisitem.author.deptGIR IUSA-ONEHEALTH 5: Reproducción Animal, Oncología y Anestesiología Comparadas-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Sanidad Animal y Seguridad Alimentaria-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Patología Animal, Producción Animal, Bromatología y Tecnología de Los Alimentos-
crisitem.author.deptGIR IUSA-ONEHEALTH 5: Reproducción Animal, Oncología y Anestesiología Comparadas-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Sanidad Animal y Seguridad Alimentaria-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Patología Animal, Producción Animal, Bromatología y Tecnología de Los Alimentos-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-9753-4786-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Investigaciones Biomédicas y Sanitarias-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Sanidad Animal y Seguridad Alimentaria-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Sanidad Animal y Seguridad Alimentaria-
crisitem.author.fullNameBatista Arteaga, Miguel-
crisitem.author.fullNameCabrera Martín, Fernando-
crisitem.author.fullNameGracia Molina, Anselmo-
Appears in Collections:Artículos
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

38
checked on Nov 24, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

35
checked on Nov 24, 2024

Page view(s)

109
checked on Nov 9, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Share



Export metadata



Items in accedaCRIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.