Identificador persistente para citar o vincular este elemento: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/51548
Campo DC Valoridioma
dc.contributor.authorBatista, M.
dc.contributor.authorSantana, M.
dc.contributor.authorAlamo, D.
dc.contributor.authorGonzález, F.
dc.contributor.authorNiño, T.
dc.contributor.authorCabrera, F.
dc.contributor.authorGracia, A.
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-25T01:35:35Z-
dc.date.available2018-11-25T01:35:35Z-
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.issn0936-6768
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10553/51548-
dc.description.abstractThis study assessed the effects of different incubation temperatures on semen viability and the influence of pooling on semen longevity. In experiment 1, semen samples were collected from five dogs, individually processed (individual semen: IS) and then aliquots from each male were pooled (pooled semen: PS). Semen samples (IS and PS) were diluted in a Tris-glucose-yolk extender and preserved as fresh (37 and 25 degrees C) and chilled semen (4 degrees C). Sperm motility and the percentages of sperm abnormalities and acrosome membrane integrity were assessed for 24 h. Storage at 25 or 4 degrees C for the first 24 h yielded similar semen quality, but incubation at 37 degrees C caused drastic reduction in sperm motility from 8 h of incubation onwards. In experiment 2, the semen was processed in the same way to that of experiment 1 and then preserved at 25 or 4 degrees C until semen inactivation. Semen that was incubated at 25 degrees C became completely inactive after 34 days of storage, while semen that was preserved at 4 degrees C presented with more gradually decreased sperm motility (mean values of 40-60% for the first 8 days). In addition, the mixing of semen was only observed to influence the sperm quality of the samples stored at 4 degrees C. In experiment 3, semen was collected from five dogs, pooled and frozen in liquid nitrogen; after thawing, it was preserved at 37, 25, 15 and 4 degrees C, and the sperm quality was defined. The motility of the freeze-thawed semen samples decreased quickly in the first 4 h after thawing, regardless of the preservation temperature of the thawed semen. This study confirmed that semen preserved at 37 degrees C should be used within a maximum of 12 h, while the semen stored at 25 degrees C shows acceptable quality for 24 h. Chilled semen presented highest most sustainable quality, especially when semen is processed as pooled semen.
dc.publisher0936-6768
dc.relation.ispartofReproduction in Domestic Animals
dc.sourceReproduction in Domestic Animals[ISSN 0936-6768],v. 47, p. 1049-1055
dc.subject.otherLiquid-Nitrogen Vapor
dc.subject.otherLong-Term Storage
dc.subject.otherDog Spermatozoa
dc.subject.otherIn-Vitro
dc.subject.otherEgg-Yolk
dc.subject.otherSperm Subpopulations
dc.subject.otherPostthaw Dilution
dc.subject.otherQuality
dc.subject.otherMotility
dc.subject.otherCryopreservation
dc.titleEffects of Incubation Temperature and Semen Pooling on the Viability of Fresh, Chilled and Freeze-Thawed Canine Semen Samples
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/Articlees
dc.typeArticlees
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1439-0531.2012.02014.x
dc.identifier.scopus84868685602
dc.identifier.isi000310790800030
dc.contributor.authorscopusid6506315360
dc.contributor.authorscopusid35936129800
dc.contributor.authorscopusid6507009446
dc.contributor.authorscopusid57194243767
dc.contributor.authorscopusid23091540700
dc.contributor.authorscopusid7006639324
dc.contributor.authorscopusid7006185082
dc.description.lastpage1055
dc.description.firstpage1049
dc.relation.volume47
dc.type2Artículoes
dc.contributor.daisngid30341669
dc.contributor.daisngid746940
dc.contributor.daisngid1791005
dc.contributor.daisngid3001453
dc.contributor.daisngid2567189
dc.contributor.daisngid18017708
dc.contributor.daisngid7908263
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Batista, M
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Santana, M
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Alamo, D
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Gonzalez, F
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Nino, T
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Cabrera, F
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Gracia, A
dc.date.coverdateDiciembre 2012
dc.identifier.ulpgces
dc.description.sjr0,621
dc.description.jcr1,392
dc.description.sjrqQ1
dc.description.jcrqQ1
dc.description.scieSCIE
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextSin texto completo-
crisitem.author.deptGIR IUIBS: Medicina Veterinaria e Investigación Terapéutica-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Investigaciones Biomédicas y Sanitarias-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Patología Animal, Producción Animal, Bromatología y Tecnología de Los Alimentos-
crisitem.author.deptGIR IUSA-ONEHEALTH 5: Reproducción Animal, Oncología y Anestesiología Comparadas-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Sanidad Animal y Seguridad Alimentaria-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Patología Animal, Producción Animal, Bromatología y Tecnología de Los Alimentos-
crisitem.author.deptGIR IUSA-ONEHEALTH 5: Reproducción Animal, Oncología y Anestesiología Comparadas-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Sanidad Animal y Seguridad Alimentaria-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Patología Animal, Producción Animal, Bromatología y Tecnología de Los Alimentos-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-9753-4786-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Investigaciones Biomédicas y Sanitarias-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Sanidad Animal y Seguridad Alimentaria-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Sanidad Animal y Seguridad Alimentaria-
crisitem.author.fullNameBatista Arteaga, Miguel-
crisitem.author.fullNameCabrera Martín, Fernando-
crisitem.author.fullNameGracia Molina, Anselmo-
Colección:Artículos
Vista resumida

Citas SCOPUSTM   

13
actualizado el 21-abr-2024

Citas de WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

12
actualizado el 25-feb-2024

Visitas

55
actualizado el 13-ene-2024

Google ScholarTM

Verifica

Altmetric


Comparte



Exporta metadatos



Los elementos en ULPGC accedaCRIS están protegidos por derechos de autor con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.