Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
				https://accedacris.ulpgc.es/jspui/handle/10553/51124
			
		| Title: | Evaluating residents' preferences for remediation technologies: a choice experiment approach | Authors: | Huynh, Elisabeth Araña, Jorge E. Prior, Jason | UNESCO Clasification: | 3303 ingeniería y tecnología químicas 3308 Ingeniería y tecnología del medio ambiente | Keywords: | Discrete choice Environmental valuation Choice modelling Environmental remediation Contamination, et al | Issue Date: | 2018 | Journal: | Science of the Total Environment | Abstract: | The choice of technologies used to remediate contaminated environments is increasingly made through engagement with a multitude of stakeholders including affected residents. Despite this, little is known about how residents perceive remediation technology applications. In this study a choice experiment is designed to explore ways of understanding and measuring residents' preferences for different remediation technologies approaches using a sample of 944 residents in New South Wales, Australia. Analysis reveals that the residents' acceptability of remediation technologies can be explained by both the efficacy of the technology in improving the environmental quality of the community, and the reputational value of the technology. In particular it is found that residents prefer Monitor Natural Attenuation and Bioremediation to other remediation technologies. In particular they are willing to pay an increase in yearly taxes of $44.60 and $41.15 respectively for implementing such technologies instead of alternative remediation technologies like Chemical remediation. | URI: | https://accedacris.ulpgc.es/handle/10553/51124 | ISSN: | 0048-9697 | DOI: | 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.125 | Source: | Science of the Total Environment [ISSN 0048-9697], v. 621, p. 1012-1022, (Abril 2018) | 
| Appears in Collections: | Artículos | 
SCOPUSTM   
 Citations
										
									
									
		
			
				
					
						16
					
					
				
			
			
		
		
								
										checked on Jun 8, 2025
									
								WEB OF SCIENCETM
 Citations
										
									
									
		
			
				
					
						16
					
					
				
			
			
		
		
								
										checked on Jun 8, 2025
									
								Page view(s)
46
										checked on May 4, 2024
									
								Google ScholarTM
							Check
						Altmetric
Share
Export metadata
Items in accedaCRIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.