Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/48762
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMasa, Juan F.en_US
dc.contributor.authorCorral, Jaimeen_US
dc.contributor.authorPereira, Ricardoen_US
dc.contributor.authorDuran-Cantolla, Joaquinen_US
dc.contributor.authorCabello, Martaen_US
dc.contributor.authorHernández-Blasco, Luisen_US
dc.contributor.authorMonasterio, Carmenen_US
dc.contributor.authorAlonso-Fernandez, Albertoen_US
dc.contributor.authorChiner, Eusebien_US
dc.contributor.authorFrancisco-José Vázquez-Poloen_US
dc.contributor.authorJose, M. Montserraten_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-24T00:42:58Z-
dc.date.available2018-11-24T00:42:58Z-
dc.date.issued2013en_US
dc.identifier.issn0903-1936en_US
dc.identifier.otherWoS-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10553/48762-
dc.description.abstractAutomatic home respiratory polygraphy (HRP) scoring functions can potentially confirm the diagnosis of sleep apnoea-hypopnoea syndrome (SAHS) (obviating technician scoring) in a substantial number of patients. The result would have important management and cost implications. The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic cost-effectiveness of a sequential HRP scoring protocol (automatic and then manual for residual cases) compared with manual HRP scoring, and with in-hospital polysomnography.We included suspected SAHS patients in a multicentre study and assigned them to home and hospital protocols at random. We constructed receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for manual and automatic scoring. Diagnostic agreement for several cut-off points was explored and costs for two equally effective alternatives were calculated.Of 366 randomised patients, 348 completed the protocol. Manual scoring produced better ROC curves than automatic scoring. There was no sensitive automatic or subsequent manual HRP apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI) cut-off point. The specific cut-off points for automatic and subsequent manual HRP scorings (AHI >25 and >20, respectively) had a specificity of 93% for automatic and 94% for manual scorings. The costs of manual protocol were 9% higher than sequential HRP protocol; these were 69% and 64%, respectively, of the cost of the polysomnography.A sequential HRP scoring protocol is a cost-effective alternative to polysomnography, although with limited cost savings compared to HRP manual scoring.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisher0903-1936-
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Respiratory Journalen_US
dc.sourceEuropean Respiratory Journal[ISSN 0903-1936],v. 41, p. 879-887en_US
dc.subject32 Ciencias médicasen_US
dc.subject320508 Enfermedades pulmonaresen_US
dc.subject.otherObstructive Sleep-Apneaen_US
dc.subject.otherPositive Airway Pressureen_US
dc.subject.otherCost-Effectivenessen_US
dc.subject.otherDiagnosisen_US
dc.subject.otherHypopneaen_US
dc.subject.otherPolysomnographyen_US
dc.subject.otherValidationen_US
dc.subject.otherDeviceen_US
dc.subject.otherDisordersen_US
dc.titleEffectiveness of sequential automaticmanual home respiratory polygraphy scoringen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/Articleen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1183/09031936.00186811en_US
dc.identifier.scopus84875849060-
dc.identifier.isi000317639000018-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid7003898125-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid7102958064-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid57200955971-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid57192815740-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid16681634300-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid57168745000-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid6603641350-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid6603567863-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid9739219600-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid7003587007-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid6602318225-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid15032957400-
dc.identifier.eissn1399-3003-
dc.description.lastpage887en_US
dc.description.firstpage879en_US
dc.relation.volume41en_US
dc.investigacionCiencias de la Saluden_US
dc.type2Artículoen_US
dc.contributor.daisngid29951081-
dc.contributor.daisngid1590394-
dc.contributor.daisngid30390822-
dc.contributor.daisngid421185-
dc.contributor.daisngid31966301-
dc.contributor.daisngid3474162-
dc.contributor.daisngid871884-
dc.contributor.daisngid1020442-
dc.contributor.daisngid214674-
dc.contributor.daisngid29952969-
dc.contributor.daisngid34915448-
dc.description.numberofpages9en_US
dc.utils.revisionen_US
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Masa, JF-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Corral, J-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Pereira, R-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Duran-Cantolla, J-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Cabello, M-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Hernandez-Blasco, L-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Monasterio, C-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Alonso-Fernandez, A-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Chiner, E-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Vazquez-Polo, FJ-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Montserrat, JM-
dc.date.coverdateAbril 2013en_US
dc.identifier.supplement56-
dc.identifier.abstractid8-
dc.identifier.ulpgcen_US
dc.contributor.buulpgcBU-MEDen_US
dc.description.sjr2,992
dc.description.jcr7,125
dc.description.sjrqQ1
dc.description.jcrqQ1
dc.description.scieSCIE
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextCon texto completo-
crisitem.author.deptGIR Técnicas estadísticas bayesianas y de decisión en la economía y empresa-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Turismo y Desarrollo Económico Sostenible-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Métodos Cuantitativos en Economía y Gestión-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-0632-6138-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Turismo y Desarrollo Económico Sostenible-
crisitem.author.fullNameVázquez Polo, Francisco José-
Appears in Collections:Artículos
Adobe PDF (334,69 kB)
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

30
checked on Aug 14, 2022

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

28
checked on Aug 14, 2022

Page view(s)

45
checked on May 7, 2022

Download(s)

15
checked on May 7, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Share



Export metadata



Items in accedaCRIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.