Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/48735
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorArráez-Aybar, Luis Alfonsoen_US
dc.contributor.authorSánchez-Montesinos, Indalecioen_US
dc.contributor.authorMirapeix, Rosa M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMompeo-Corredera, Blancaen_US
dc.contributor.authorSañudo-Tejero, Jose Ramónen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-24T00:29:12Z-
dc.date.available2018-11-24T00:29:12Z-
dc.date.issued2010en_US
dc.identifier.issn0940-9602en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10553/48735-
dc.description.abstractAim: The aim of this study has been to evaluate the relevance of gross human anatomy in daily clinical practice and to compare it to that of other basic sciences (biochemistry, bioethics, cytohistology, microbiology, pharmacology, physiology, psychology).Materials and methods: A total of 1250 questionnaires were distributed among 38 different medical speciality professionals. Answers were analyzed taking into account speciality (medical, surgery and others), professional status (training physician or staff member) and professional experience.Results: The response rate was 42.9% (n = 536). Gross human anatomy was considered the most relevant basic discipline for surgical specialists, while pharmacology and physiology were most relevant for medical specialists. Knowledge of anatomy was also considered fundamental for understanding neurological or musculoskeletal disorders. In undergraduate programmes, the most important focuses in teaching anatomy were radiological, topographical and functional anatomy followed by systematic anatomy. In daily medical practice anatomy was considered basic for physical examination, symptom interpretation and interpretation of radiological images. When professional status or professional experience was considered, small variations were shown and there were no significant differences related to gender or community.Conclusion: Our results underline the relevance of basic sciences (gross anatomy, physiology, and pharmacology) in daily professional activity. Evidence-based studies such as ours, lend greater credibility and objectivity to the role of gross anatomy in the undergraduate training of health professionals and should help to establish a more appropriate curriculum for future professionals.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAnnals of Anatomyen_US
dc.sourceAnnals of Anatomy [ISSN 0940-9602], v. 192 (6), p. 341-348, (Diciembre 2010)en_US
dc.subject32 Ciencias médicasen_US
dc.subject3201 Ciencias clínicasen_US
dc.subject241002 Anatomía humanaen_US
dc.subject531204 Educaciónen_US
dc.subject.otherAnatomical education undergraduateen_US
dc.subject.otherMedical educationen_US
dc.subject.otherEvidence-based medical educationen_US
dc.subject.otherGross anatomy curriculumen_US
dc.subject.otherMedical curriculumen_US
dc.titleRelevance of human anatomy in daily clinical practiceen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/Articleen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.aanat.2010.05.002en_US
dc.identifier.scopus78349309977-
dc.identifier.isi000286452200002-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid6603661311-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid6603330088-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid35615477600-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid6602277779-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid6504652285-
dc.description.lastpage348en_US
dc.identifier.issue6-
dc.description.firstpage341en_US
dc.relation.volume192en_US
dc.investigacionCiencias de la Saluden_US
dc.type2Artículoen_US
dc.contributor.daisngid1718428-
dc.contributor.daisngid1612930-
dc.contributor.daisngid1487760-
dc.contributor.daisngid8353507-
dc.contributor.daisngid18455259-
dc.description.numberofpages8en_US
dc.utils.revisionen_US
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Arraez-Aybar, LA-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Sanchez-Montesinos, I-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Mirapeix, RM-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Mompeo-Corredera, B-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Sanudo-Tejero, JR-
dc.date.coverdateDiciembre 2010en_US
dc.identifier.ulpgcen_US
dc.contributor.buulpgcBU-MEDen_US
dc.description.jcr1,658-
dc.description.jcrqQ2-
dc.description.scieSCIE-
item.fulltextSin texto completo-
item.grantfulltextnone-
crisitem.author.deptGIR IUSA-ONEHEALTH 5: Reproducción Animal, Oncología y Anestesiología Comparadas-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Sanidad Animal y Seguridad Alimentaria-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-4953-7653-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Sanidad Animal y Seguridad Alimentaria-
crisitem.author.fullNameMompeó Corredera,Blanca Rosa-
Appears in Collections:Artículos
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

77
checked on Oct 6, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

76
checked on Oct 6, 2024

Page view(s)

13
checked on Oct 15, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Share



Export metadata



Items in accedaCRIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.