Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10553/48735
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Arráez-Aybar, Luis Alfonso | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Sánchez-Montesinos, Indalecio | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Mirapeix, Rosa M. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Mompeo-Corredera, Blanca | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Sañudo-Tejero, Jose Ramón | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-11-24T00:29:12Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2018-11-24T00:29:12Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2010 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0940-9602 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10553/48735 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Aim: The aim of this study has been to evaluate the relevance of gross human anatomy in daily clinical practice and to compare it to that of other basic sciences (biochemistry, bioethics, cytohistology, microbiology, pharmacology, physiology, psychology).Materials and methods: A total of 1250 questionnaires were distributed among 38 different medical speciality professionals. Answers were analyzed taking into account speciality (medical, surgery and others), professional status (training physician or staff member) and professional experience.Results: The response rate was 42.9% (n = 536). Gross human anatomy was considered the most relevant basic discipline for surgical specialists, while pharmacology and physiology were most relevant for medical specialists. Knowledge of anatomy was also considered fundamental for understanding neurological or musculoskeletal disorders. In undergraduate programmes, the most important focuses in teaching anatomy were radiological, topographical and functional anatomy followed by systematic anatomy. In daily medical practice anatomy was considered basic for physical examination, symptom interpretation and interpretation of radiological images. When professional status or professional experience was considered, small variations were shown and there were no significant differences related to gender or community.Conclusion: Our results underline the relevance of basic sciences (gross anatomy, physiology, and pharmacology) in daily professional activity. Evidence-based studies such as ours, lend greater credibility and objectivity to the role of gross anatomy in the undergraduate training of health professionals and should help to establish a more appropriate curriculum for future professionals. | en_US |
dc.language | eng | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Annals of Anatomy | en_US |
dc.source | Annals of Anatomy [ISSN 0940-9602], v. 192 (6), p. 341-348, (Diciembre 2010) | en_US |
dc.subject | 32 Ciencias médicas | en_US |
dc.subject | 3201 Ciencias clínicas | en_US |
dc.subject | 241002 Anatomía humana | en_US |
dc.subject | 531204 Educación | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Anatomical education undergraduate | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Medical education | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Evidence-based medical education | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Gross anatomy curriculum | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Medical curriculum | en_US |
dc.title | Relevance of human anatomy in daily clinical practice | en_US |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/Article | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.aanat.2010.05.002 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopus | 78349309977 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | 000286452200002 | - |
dc.contributor.authorscopusid | 6603661311 | - |
dc.contributor.authorscopusid | 6603330088 | - |
dc.contributor.authorscopusid | 35615477600 | - |
dc.contributor.authorscopusid | 6602277779 | - |
dc.contributor.authorscopusid | 6504652285 | - |
dc.description.lastpage | 348 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 6 | - |
dc.description.firstpage | 341 | en_US |
dc.relation.volume | 192 | en_US |
dc.investigacion | Ciencias de la Salud | en_US |
dc.type2 | Artículo | en_US |
dc.contributor.daisngid | 1718428 | - |
dc.contributor.daisngid | 1612930 | - |
dc.contributor.daisngid | 1487760 | - |
dc.contributor.daisngid | 8353507 | - |
dc.contributor.daisngid | 18455259 | - |
dc.description.numberofpages | 8 | en_US |
dc.utils.revision | Sí | en_US |
dc.contributor.wosstandard | WOS:Arraez-Aybar, LA | - |
dc.contributor.wosstandard | WOS:Sanchez-Montesinos, I | - |
dc.contributor.wosstandard | WOS:Mirapeix, RM | - |
dc.contributor.wosstandard | WOS:Mompeo-Corredera, B | - |
dc.contributor.wosstandard | WOS:Sanudo-Tejero, JR | - |
dc.date.coverdate | Diciembre 2010 | en_US |
dc.identifier.ulpgc | Sí | en_US |
dc.contributor.buulpgc | BU-MED | en_US |
dc.description.jcr | 1,658 | - |
dc.description.jcrq | Q2 | - |
dc.description.scie | SCIE | - |
item.fulltext | Sin texto completo | - |
item.grantfulltext | none | - |
crisitem.author.dept | GIR IUSA-ONEHEALTH 5: Reproducción Animal, Oncología y Anestesiología Comparadas | - |
crisitem.author.dept | IU de Sanidad Animal y Seguridad Alimentaria | - |
crisitem.author.orcid | 0000-0003-4953-7653 | - |
crisitem.author.parentorg | IU de Sanidad Animal y Seguridad Alimentaria | - |
crisitem.author.fullName | Mompeó Corredera,Blanca Rosa | - |
Appears in Collections: | Artículos |
SCOPUSTM
Citations
77
checked on Oct 6, 2024
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
76
checked on Oct 6, 2024
Page view(s)
13
checked on Oct 15, 2022
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Share
Export metadata
Items in accedaCRIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.