Identificador persistente para citar o vincular este elemento: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/47858
Campo DC Valoridioma
dc.contributor.authorMorales-Delanuez, A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez, C.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSantana, M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHernández Castellano, Lorenzo Enriqueen_US
dc.contributor.authorNiño, T.en_US
dc.contributor.authorReyes-Chacon, R. J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMoreno-Indias, I.en_US
dc.contributor.authorCastro, N.en_US
dc.contributor.authorCapote, J.en_US
dc.contributor.otherCastro, Noemi-
dc.contributor.otherMorales de la Nuez, Antonio-
dc.contributor.otherHernandez-Castellano, Lorenzo Enrique-
dc.contributor.otherMoreno-Indias, Isabel-
dc.contributor.otherMoreno-Indias, Isabel-
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-23T17:00:44Z-
dc.date.available2018-11-23T17:00:44Z-
dc.date.issued2012en_US
dc.identifier.issn0971-2119en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10553/47858-
dc.description.abstractIn order to complement previous DNA studies, 81 domestic goats, belonging to the Majorera Breed (MB, 105), Semi Wild Goats (SWG, 31) and Tinerfena Breed (TF 61), were used. Bothpopulations (MB and SWG), allocated in the same geographical area, were differentiated previously by microsatellites analyses, and TF is from another island. Thirteen morphological measurements were recorded, zoometric indexes were calculated and profile and coat colour were evaluated. For all morphological measurements, SWG were significantly smaller than MB and TF. These results agree with previous data obtained with genetic studies, which show difference between MB and SWG. The results of the zoometric indexes showed that SWG were lighter and shorter in relation to the thoracic circumference and height, suggesting long-term environmental adaptation. In general, higher correlations were observed in SWG than in MB followed by the TF, for example between height at the end of neck and height to the rump (0.880, 0.740 and 0.683, respectively), probably indicating a superior body balance to adapt to ultra-extensive conditions. Withregard to other parameters, most SWG presented a subconcave profile (66.7%) compared to TF, which had 71.19% of rectum profile and 40.60% of MB was subconvex. SWG had less complex colour distribution.en_US
dc.languagespaen_US
dc.publisher0971-2119
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Applied Animal Researchen_US
dc.sourceJournal of Applied Animal Research[ISSN 0971-2119],v. 40, p. 215-221en_US
dc.titleMorphological measurements and indexes as a tool to support molecular genetic studies: An example in Canary Islandsen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/Articleen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/09712119.2012.658062en_US
dc.identifier.scopus84864136010-
dc.identifier.isi000306601500008-
dcterms.isPartOfJournal Of Applied Animal Research
dcterms.sourceJournal Of Applied Animal Research[ISSN 0971-2119],v. 40 (3), p. 215-221
dc.contributor.authorscopusid24332251000-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid57212716948-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid57193918240-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid35936129800-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid36682092900-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid23091540700-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid55319066600-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid24332457100-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid57200208399-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid6602424338-
dc.description.lastpage221en_US
dc.description.firstpage215en_US
dc.relation.volume40en_US
dc.type2Artículoen_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000306601500008-
dc.contributor.daisngid1372355-
dc.contributor.daisngid6537196-
dc.contributor.daisngid746940-
dc.contributor.daisngid1033930-
dc.contributor.daisngid2567189-
dc.contributor.daisngid14837441-
dc.contributor.daisngid1065675-
dc.contributor.daisngid330531-
dc.contributor.daisngid383596-
dc.contributor.daisngid31468438-
dc.identifier.investigatorRIDF-9621-2016-
dc.identifier.investigatorRIDO-4239-2018-
dc.identifier.investigatorRIDT-1034-2016-
dc.identifier.investigatorRIDB-6595-2017-
dc.identifier.investigatorRIDE-8907-2011-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Morales-delaNuez, A-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Rodriguez, C-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Santana, M-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Hernandez-Castellano, LE-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Nino, T-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Reyes-Chacon, RJ-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Moreno-Indias, I-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Castro, N-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Capote, J-
dc.date.coverdateSeptiembre 2012en_US
dc.identifier.ulpgces
dc.description.sjr0,207
dc.description.jcr0,123
dc.description.sjrqQ3
dc.description.jcrqQ4
dc.description.scieSCIE
item.fulltextSin texto completo-
item.grantfulltextnone-
crisitem.author.deptGIR IUSA-ONEHEALTH 4. Producción y Biotecnología Animal-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Sanidad Animal y Seguridad Alimentaria-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Patología Animal, Producción Animal, Bromatología y Tecnología de Los Alimentos-
crisitem.author.deptGIR IUSA-ONEHEALTH 4. Producción y Biotecnología Animal-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Sanidad Animal y Seguridad Alimentaria-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Patología Animal, Producción Animal, Bromatología y Tecnología de Los Alimentos-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-2729-0434-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-3026-2031-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Sanidad Animal y Seguridad Alimentaria-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Sanidad Animal y Seguridad Alimentaria-
crisitem.author.fullNameHernández Castellano, Lorenzo Enrique-
crisitem.author.fullNameCastro Navarro, Noemí-
crisitem.author.fullNameCapote Álvarez, Juan Francisco-
Colección:Artículos
Vista resumida

Citas SCOPUSTM   

7
actualizado el 24-mar-2024

Citas de WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

8
actualizado el 25-feb-2024

Visitas

32
actualizado el 19-nov-2022

Google ScholarTM

Verifica

Altmetric


Comparte



Exporta metadatos



Los elementos en ULPGC accedaCRIS están protegidos por derechos de autor con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.