Identificador persistente para citar o vincular este elemento: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/47846
Campo DC Valoridioma
dc.contributor.authorCaja, G.
dc.contributor.authorCarné, S.
dc.contributor.authorSalama, A. A.K.
dc.contributor.authorAit-Saidi, A.
dc.contributor.authorRojas-Olivares, M. A.
dc.contributor.authorRovai, M.
dc.contributor.authorCapote, J.
dc.contributor.authorCastro, N.
dc.contributor.authorArgueello, A.
dc.contributor.authorAyadi, M.
dc.contributor.authorAljumaah, R.
dc.contributor.authorAlshaikh, M. A.
dc.contributor.otherCastro, Noemi
dc.contributor.otherArguello, Anastasio
dc.contributor.otherCaja, Gerardo
dc.contributor.otherSalama, Ahmed
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-23T16:55:06Z-
dc.date.available2018-11-23T16:55:06Z-
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.issn0921-4488
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10553/47846-
dc.description.abstractUse of electronic identification (e-ID) of caprine breeding stock, based on radio frequency passive transponders, is compulsory in most EU countries and it is foreseen as a powerful tool for the improvement of the goat industry. This paper compares the performances of the most used e-ID devices (i.e., ear tags, injects, boluses and leg tags) with plastic ear tags in goats. Ear dimensions, environment and ear tag features result in variable retention and readability of visual and e-ID ear tags in goats. Light and high quality button ear tags provide suitable results under intensive conditions but they are not fully satisfactory under extensive conditions. Injectable transponders have been also evaluated in different body sites (ear base, armpit, groin, tail, pastern and intraperitoneal) of goats. Main drawbacks of injects are migration and retrieval at slaughter, but injection in the armpit is suitable for goats under harsh conditions (i.e., game and feral goats) and carcass traceability. Injection in the pastern has the advantage of not letting carcass residues, although readability is compromised by the small size of the transponders used and is not recommended for most on-farm applications. Performances of e-ID rumen boluses vary by bolus features and goat breed. Research showed that denser boluses than in sheep (>3.3) and high quality transponders allow >98% readability in goats. Leg tags are only recommended for adult dairy goats under intensive conditions. Dynamic reading efficiency strongly depends on the position of the antenna and on the type of e-ID device, which becomes an issue of major relevance when different e-ID device types are in use in the same herd for management and performance recording. (C) 2014 Published by Elsevier B.V.
dc.publisher0921-4488
dc.relation.ispartofSmall Ruminant Research
dc.sourceSmall Ruminant Research[ISSN 0921-4488],v. 121 (1), p. 42-50
dc.subject.otherSmall Ruminal Boluses
dc.subject.otherEar Tags
dc.subject.otherDairy Goats
dc.subject.otherInjectable Transponders
dc.subject.otherRumen Boluses
dc.subject.otherMini-Boluses
dc.subject.otherCattle
dc.subject.otherLambs
dc.subject.otherPerformance
dc.subject.otherRetention
dc.titleState-of-the-art of electronic identification techniques and applications in goats
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/Articlees
dc.typeArticlees
dc.relation.conference11th International Conference on Goats
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.smallrumres.2014.05.012
dc.identifier.scopus84906943700-
dc.identifier.isi000342540800008
dcterms.isPartOfSmall Ruminant Research
dcterms.sourceSmall Ruminant Research[ISSN 0921-4488],v. 121 (1), p. 42-50
dc.contributor.authorscopusid24288116400
dc.contributor.authorscopusid22952907500
dc.contributor.authorscopusid25633239600
dc.contributor.authorscopusid25621492500
dc.contributor.authorscopusid36640600600
dc.contributor.authorscopusid6505763995
dc.contributor.authorscopusid6602424338
dc.contributor.authorscopusid57200208399
dc.contributor.authorscopusid6701710018
dc.contributor.authorscopusid57203044289
dc.contributor.authorscopusid8253044800
dc.contributor.authorscopusid6602919818
dc.description.lastpage50
dc.description.firstpage42
dc.relation.volume121
dc.type2Artículoes
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000342540800008
dc.contributor.daisngid111253
dc.contributor.daisngid1261237
dc.contributor.daisngid548936
dc.contributor.daisngid6162099
dc.contributor.daisngid6198713
dc.contributor.daisngid1240007
dc.contributor.daisngid31968878
dc.contributor.daisngid383596
dc.contributor.daisngid330531
dc.contributor.daisngid298051
dc.contributor.daisngid1218518
dc.contributor.daisngid1034092
dc.contributor.daisngid887525
dc.contributor.daisngid11417609
dc.identifier.investigatorRIDF-9621-2016
dc.identifier.investigatorRIDB-4493-2010
dc.identifier.investigatorRIDNo ID
dc.identifier.investigatorRIDNo ID
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Caja, G
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Carne, S
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Salama, AAK
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Ait-Saidi, A
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Rojas-Olivares, MA
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Rovai, M
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Capote, J
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Castro, N
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Arguello, A
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Ayadi, M
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Aljumaah, R
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Alshaikh, MA
dc.date.coverdateEnero 2014
dc.identifier.conferenceidevents120872
dc.identifier.ulpgces
dc.description.sjr0,662
dc.description.jcr1,125
dc.description.sjrqQ2
dc.description.jcrqQ2
dc.description.scieSCIE
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextSin texto completo-
crisitem.event.eventsstartdate24-09-2012-
crisitem.event.eventsenddate27-09-2012-
crisitem.author.deptGIR IUSA-ONEHEALTH 4. Producción y Biotecnología Animal-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Sanidad Animal y Seguridad Alimentaria-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Patología Animal, Producción Animal, Bromatología y Tecnología de Los Alimentos-
crisitem.author.deptGIR IUSA-ONEHEALTH 4. Producción y Biotecnología Animal-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Sanidad Animal y Seguridad Alimentaria-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Patología Animal, Producción Animal, Bromatología y Tecnología de Los Alimentos-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-3026-2031-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-4426-0678-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Sanidad Animal y Seguridad Alimentaria-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Sanidad Animal y Seguridad Alimentaria-
crisitem.author.fullNameCapote Álvarez, Juan Francisco-
crisitem.author.fullNameCastro Navarro, Noemí-
crisitem.author.fullNameArgüello Henríquez, Anastasio-
Colección:Artículos
Vista resumida

Citas SCOPUSTM   

14
actualizado el 15-sep-2024

Citas de WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

12
actualizado el 15-sep-2024

Visitas

62
actualizado el 24-ago-2024

Google ScholarTM

Verifica

Altmetric


Comparte



Exporta metadatos



Los elementos en ULPGC accedaCRIS están protegidos por derechos de autor con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.