Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/46639
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSole Violan, Jorgeen_US
dc.contributor.authorArroyo Fernández, Javieren_US
dc.contributor.authorBordes Benítez, Anaen_US
dc.contributor.authorCardeñosa Cendrero, José A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez De Castro, Felipe Carlos B.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-23T06:38:34Z-
dc.date.available2018-11-23T06:38:34Z-
dc.date.issued2000en_US
dc.identifier.issn0090-3493en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10553/46639-
dc.description.abstractObjective: To assess how data obtained by invasive diagnostic techniques may affect management and outcome of patients with suspected ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), in comparison with noninvasive qualitative techniques,Design: Prospective study.Setting: An 18-bed medical and surgical intensive care unitPatients: A total of 91 patients suspected of having VAP were randomized into two groups. In group A (n = 45), quantitative cultures obtained by either bronchoscopic or nonbronchoscopic techniques were performed, whereas in group B (n = 43), patients were treated based on clinical judgment and nonquantitative tracheal aspirates cultures. Three patients were excluded because of the absence of follow-up.Results: In patients with positive cultures, therapeutic changes were made in 20 patients. In four patients (three from group A and one from group B, p = NS), initial empirical antibiotic treatment was modified because the isolated microorganisms were not susceptible (all of them had late-onset pneumonia), The isolated organisms responsible for antibiotic modifications were methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (three patients) and Pseudo-monas aeruginosa (one patient), In three patients, the antimicrobial therapy was considered inappropriate because the isolated microorganisms were multiresistant and treated with only one effective antibiotic. In 13 patients (ten from group A and three from group B, p < .05), treatment was changed to select a narrower spectrum antibiotic. No therapeutic modifications were made in patients with negative cultures based on the results of quantitative cultures.The overall mortality was 22.2% in group A and 20.9% in group B. There were no differences in intensive care unit stay or days of mechanical ventilation (23.67 +/- 3.15 vs. 22.42 +/- 3.01 and 19.99 +/- 2.88 vs. 19.24 +/- 3.04, respectively).Conclusions: In our study population, the routine use of quantitative invasive diagnostic tools is not justified in the setting of ventilated patients clinically suspected of having nosocomial pneumonia.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofCritical Care Medicineen_US
dc.sourceCritical Care Medicine [ISSN 0090-3493],v. 28, p. 2737-2741en_US
dc.subject32 Ciencias médicasen_US
dc.subject3205 Medicina internaen_US
dc.subject.otherNosocomial Pneumoniaen_US
dc.subject.otherMortalityen_US
dc.subject.otherTherapyen_US
dc.subject.otherCultureen_US
dc.titleImpact of quantitative invasive diagnostic techniques in the management and outcome of mechanically ventilated patients with suspected pneumoniaen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/Articleen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/00003246-200008000-00009en_US
dc.identifier.scopus0033848058-
dc.identifier.isi000088867300009-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid55401479000-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid57206610264-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid57206610264-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid57206548570-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid57206548570-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid36338870300-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid55942667000-
dc.description.lastpage2741en_US
dc.description.firstpage2737en_US
dc.relation.volume28en_US
dc.investigacionCiencias de la Saluden_US
dc.type2Artículoen_US
dc.contributor.daisngid3159318-
dc.contributor.daisngid30793336-
dc.contributor.daisngid4740016-
dc.contributor.daisngid10534662-
dc.contributor.daisngid464249-
dc.description.numberofpages5en_US
dc.utils.revisionen_US
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Violan, JS-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Fernandez, JA-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Benitez, AB-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Cendrero, JAC-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:de Castro, FR-
dc.date.coverdateEnero 2000en_US
dc.identifier.ulpgcen_US
dc.contributor.buulpgcBU-MEDen_US
dc.description.jcr3,824
dc.description.jcrqQ1
dc.description.scieSCIE
item.fulltextSin texto completo-
item.grantfulltextnone-
crisitem.author.deptGIR IUIBS: Patología y Tecnología médica-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Investigaciones Biomédicas y Sanitarias-
crisitem.author.deptGIR IUIBS: Patología y Tecnología médica-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Investigaciones Biomédicas y Sanitarias-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Ciencias Médicas y Quirúrgicas-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-0483-4470-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-6812-2739-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Investigaciones Biomédicas y Sanitarias-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Investigaciones Biomédicas y Sanitarias-
crisitem.author.fullNameSole Violan,Jorge-
crisitem.author.fullNameRodríguez De Castro, Felipe Carlos B.-
Appears in Collections:Artículos
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

32
checked on Feb 17, 2024

Download(s)

12
checked on Feb 17, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Share



Export metadata



Items in accedaCRIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.