Identificador persistente para citar o vincular este elemento: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/46574
Campo DC Valoridioma
dc.contributor.authorMolinos, Luisen_US
dc.contributor.authorZalacain, Rafaelen_US
dc.contributor.authorMenéndez, Rosarioen_US
dc.contributor.authorReyes, Soledaden_US
dc.contributor.authorCapelastegui, Albertoen_US
dc.contributor.authorCillóniz, Catiaen_US
dc.contributor.authorRajas, Olgaen_US
dc.contributor.authorBorderías, Luisen_US
dc.contributor.authorMartín-Villasclaras, Juan J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBello, Salvadoren_US
dc.contributor.authorAlfageme, Inmaculadaen_US
dc.contributor.authorDe Castro, Felipe Rodríguezen_US
dc.contributor.authorRello, Jordien_US
dc.contributor.authorRuiz-Manzano, Juanen_US
dc.contributor.authorGabarrús, Alberten_US
dc.contributor.authorMusher, Daniel M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorTorres, Antonien_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-23T05:53:14Z-
dc.date.available2018-11-23T05:53:14Z-
dc.date.issued2015en_US
dc.identifier.issn2325-6621en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10553/46574-
dc.description.abstractRationale: Detection of the C-polysaccharide of Streptococcus pneumoniae in urine by an immune-chromatographic test is increasingly used to evaluate patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Objectives: We assessed the sensitivity and specificity of this test in the largest series of cases to date and used logistic regression models to determine predictors of positivity in patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia. Methods: We performed a multicenter, prospective, observational study of 4,374 patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia. Measurements and Main Results: The urinary antigen test was done in 3,874 cases. Pneumococcal infection was diagnosed in 916 cases (21%); 653 (71%) of these cases were diagnosed exclusively by the urinary antigen test. Sensitivity and specificity were 60 and 99.7%, respectively. Predictors of urinary antigen positivity were female sex; heart rate ≥125 bpm, systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg, and SaO2 <90%; absence of antibiotic treatment; pleuritic chest pain; chills; pleural effusion; and blood urea nitrogen ≥30 mg/dl. With at least six of all these predictors present, the probability of positivity was 52%. With only one factor present, the probability was only 12%. Conclusions: The urinary antigen test is a method with good sensitivity and excellent specificity in diagnosing pneumococcal pneumonia, and its use greatly increased the recognition of community-acquired pneumonia due to S. pneumoniae. With a specificity of 99.7%, this test could be used to direct simplified antibiotic therapy, thereby avoiding excess costs and risk for bacterial resistance that result from broad-spectrum antibiotics. We also identified predictors of positivity that could increase suspicion for pneumococcal infection or avoid the unnecessary use of this test.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAnnals of the American Thoracic Societyen_US
dc.sourceAnnals of the American Thoracic Society[ISSN 2325-6621],v. 12, p. 1482-1489en_US
dc.subject32 Ciencias médicasen_US
dc.subject3205 Medicina internaen_US
dc.subject.otherCommunity-acquired pneumoniaen_US
dc.subject.otherPneumococcal urinary antigenen_US
dc.subject.otherSensitivityen_US
dc.subject.otherSpecificityen_US
dc.subject.otherPositive predictor factorsen_US
dc.titleSensitivity, specificity, and positivity predictors of the pneumococcal urinary antigen test in community-acquired pneumoniaen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1513/AnnalsATS.201505-304OCen_US
dc.identifier.scopus84943596610-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid6603804487-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid7003514650-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid7102205716-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid7005577703-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid55886745800-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid36058487300-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid6505890335-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid16168865800-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid6506770332-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid7004458552-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid6602891624-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid55942667000-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid7102682070-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid7003705264-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid18433859000-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid7102097220-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid56714659000-
dc.description.lastpage1489en_US
dc.description.firstpage1482en_US
dc.relation.volume12en_US
dc.investigacionCiencias de la Saluden_US
dc.type2Artículoen_US
dc.description.numberofpages8en_US
dc.utils.revisionen_US
dc.identifier.ulpgcen_US
dc.description.sjr1,479
dc.description.sjrqQ1
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextSin texto completo-
crisitem.author.deptGIR IUIBS: Patología y Tecnología médica-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Investigaciones Biomédicas y Sanitarias-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Ciencias Médicas y Quirúrgicas-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-6812-2739-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Investigaciones Biomédicas y Sanitarias-
crisitem.author.fullNameRodríguez De Castro, Felipe Carlos B.-
Colección:Artículos
Vista resumida

Citas SCOPUSTM   

46
actualizado el 17-nov-2024

Citas de WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

41
actualizado el 17-nov-2024

Visitas

74
actualizado el 01-nov-2024

Google ScholarTM

Verifica

Altmetric


Comparte



Exporta metadatos



Los elementos en ULPGC accedaCRIS están protegidos por derechos de autor con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.