Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/43638
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorZoghbi Manrique Lara, Pabloen_US
dc.contributor.otherZoghbi-Manrique-de-Lara, Pablo-
dc.contributor.otherZoghbi-Manrique-de-Lara, Pablo-
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-21T16:43:35Z-
dc.date.available2018-11-21T16:43:35Z-
dc.date.issued2009en_US
dc.identifier.issn1044-4068en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10553/43638-
dc.description.abstractPurpose - Prior research has found empirical evidence that procedural justice is an antecedent of cyberloafing in the workplace. The purpose of this paper is to explore why that association is possible. It is argued that perceptions of procedural justice affect cyberloafing because unfair procedure places an employee in conflict with the organizational rules. Accordingly, this paper predicts that it is normative conflict rather than procedural justice that really prompts employees to retaliate against the organization by engaging in cyberloafing. Design/methodology/approach - Data are collected from 147 (19.4 percent) of the 758 non-teaching staff at a public university where internet usage policy to combat its improper use has been increasingly rigid. Structural equation modeling is used to test the predicted mediation. Findings - The results show that procedural justice is an antecedent of the normative conflict that fully mediates the link between procedural justice and cyberloafing. Research limitations/implications - The subjects in this study reflect job conditions that are peculiar to the public sector. This may limit the ability to extrapolate the findings to the private sector. The findings provide a new explanation for the mechanics of the link between unfair/fair procedural perceptions and cyberloafing. Practical implications - The findings contribute to a better understanding of the way procedural justice is able to monitor cyberloafing, and discusses how actions designed to promote procedural justice may be useful to the efficient management of normative conflict, hence, the normative process is able to stifle cyberloafing. Originality/value - Employee perceptions of normative conflict are shown to mediate the relationship between procedural justice and cyberloafing. This is the first empirical test of this mediation.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisher1044-4068
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Conflict Managementen_US
dc.sourceInternational Journal of Conflict Management[ISSN 1044-4068],v. 20, p. 188-201en_US
dc.subject531104 Organización de recursos humanosen_US
dc.subject.otherRecursos humanosen_US
dc.subject.otherEmpleadosen_US
dc.titleInequity, conflict, and compliance dilemma as causes of cyberloafingen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/Articleen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1108/10444060910949630
dc.identifier.scopus67649361748-
dc.identifier.isi000266140800005-
dcterms.isPartOfInternational Journal Of Conflict Management
dcterms.sourceInternational Journal Of Conflict Management[ISSN 1044-4068],v. 20 (2), p. 188-201
dc.contributor.authorscopusid23483233800-
dc.description.lastpage201-
dc.description.firstpage188-
dc.relation.volume20-
dc.investigacionCiencias Sociales y Jurídicasen_US
dc.type2Artículoen_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000266140800005-
dc.contributor.daisngid1723135-
dc.identifier.investigatorRIDC-6039-2011-
dc.identifier.investigatorRIDNo ID-
dc.utils.revisionen_US
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Zoghbi-Manrique-De-Lara, P
dc.date.coverdateAbril 2009
dc.identifier.ulpgces
dc.description.jcr0,389
dc.description.jcrqQ4
dc.description.ssciSSCI
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextSin texto completo-
crisitem.author.deptGIR TIDES: Economía, medioambiente, sostenibilidad y turismo-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Turismo y Desarrollo Económico Sostenible-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Economía y Dirección de Empresas-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-8056-0988-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Turismo y Desarrollo Económico Sostenible-
crisitem.author.fullNameZoghbi Manrique Lara, Pablo-
Appears in Collections:Artículos
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

20
checked on Feb 5, 2023

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

14
checked on Feb 5, 2023

Page view(s)

33
checked on Sep 17, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Share



Export metadata



Items in accedaCRIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.