Identificador persistente para citar o vincular este elemento: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/42639
Campo DC Valoridioma
dc.contributor.authorZárraga-Oberty, Celiaen_US
dc.contributor.authorDe Saá-Pérez, Petraen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-21T10:28:28Z-
dc.date.available2018-11-21T10:28:28Z-
dc.date.issued2006en_US
dc.identifier.issn0955-534Xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10553/42639-
dc.description.abstractPurpose - To provide evidence about that the process called knowledge management can happen in work teams, but only if they have the necessary characteristics to be considered communities of practice. Design/methodology/ approach - First, the paper identifies the characteristics of the work team that favor knowledge management from a revision of existing literature about communities of practice. Second, by means of an empirical study of 363 individuals working in permanent teams, the paper obtains confirmation that those characteristics exercise a favorable influence on knowledge management. The empirical study is carried out by means of statistical analysis: exploratory factor analysis and Cronbach's α analyses were carried out to check the validity and reliability of scales; conducted correlation analyses were also conducted to test the six hypotheses regarding direct relationships and multiple regression analyses to assess the relative importance of each of the characteristics of the work team in knowledge management. Findings - Empirical evidence is obtained that knowledge management is favored in work teams that possess certain characteristics: self-management, leadership, individual autonomy, climate of trust, common understanding, and the members' heterogeneous and complementary skills. The paper also provides a detailed examination of that relationship. Evidence is obtained about what characteristics of work teams favor the knowledge management process in its different phases (i.e. creation of knowledge, and transfer and integration of knowledge). Research limitations/implications - On the one hand, the group rather than the individual would have been a more suitable unit of analysis. So, it should be noted that our findings are to be interpreted as individual perceptions. On the other hand, our scales represent new measures. So, they must be interpreted cautiously. Practical implications - The paper provides evidence that will help companies to understand the value of knowledge to their success and to obtain maximum performance through the organization of their human resources into teams with the appropriate characteristics to become communities of practice. Originality/value - This paper fills an empirical gap in the literature around communities of practice and knowledge managementen_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisher0955-534X
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Business Reviewen_US
dc.sourceEuropean Business Review[ISSN 0955-534X],v. 18, p. 60-76en_US
dc.subject531104 Organización de recursos humanosen_US
dc.subject.otherGestión del conocimientoen_US
dc.subject.otherGrupos de trabajoen_US
dc.titleWork teams to favor knowledge management: towards communities of practiceen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/Articlees
dc.typeArticlees
dc.identifier.doi10.1108/09555340610639851
dc.identifier.scopus29144484628-
dc.identifier.isi000213121300005
dc.contributor.authorscopusid10041560200
dc.contributor.authorscopusid13611423200
dc.description.lastpage76-
dc.description.firstpage60-
dc.relation.volume18-
dc.investigacionCiencias Sociales y Jurídicasen_US
dc.type2Artículoen_US
dc.contributor.daisngid33312344
dc.contributor.daisngid2046169
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Zarraga-Oberty, C
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:De Saa-Perez, P
dc.date.coverdateEnero 2006
dc.identifier.ulpgces
dc.description.esciESCI
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextSin texto completo-
crisitem.author.deptGIR IDeTIC: División de Organizaciones, personas y conocimiento-
crisitem.author.deptIU para el Desarrollo Tecnológico y la Innovación-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Economía y Dirección de Empresas-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-3945-5454-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU para el Desarrollo Tecnológico y la Innovación-
crisitem.author.fullNameDe Saa Pérez, Petra-
Colección:Artículos
Vista resumida

Citas SCOPUSTM   

24
actualizado el 21-abr-2024

Citas de WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

18
actualizado el 25-feb-2024

Visitas

66
actualizado el 23-ene-2024

Google ScholarTM

Verifica

Altmetric


Comparte



Exporta metadatos



Los elementos en ULPGC accedaCRIS están protegidos por derechos de autor con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.