Identificador persistente para citar o vincular este elemento: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/42546
Campo DC Valoridioma
dc.contributor.authorHernández-Marrero, Pabloen_US
dc.contributor.authorMartins Pereira, Sandraen_US
dc.contributor.authorCarvalho, Ana Sofia.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-20T13:07:56Z-
dc.date.available2018-11-20T13:07:56Z-
dc.date.issued2016en_US
dc.identifier.issn1049-9091en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10553/42546-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Ethical decisions are part of contemporary practices in palliative care. The need of making such decisions is associated to higher burnout levels and other work related problems among healthcare professionals. Aims: As part of the project entitled “Decisions in End-of-Life Care in Spain and Portugal” (DELiCaSP), this study aims to (i) identify the most common ethical decisions made by Portuguese palliative care teams and (ii) understand how the making of such decisions relates to burnout. Methods: A mixed methods study was conducted with 9 palliative care teams, using (i) questionnaires of socio-demographic and professional variables, work-related experiences, (ii) the Maslach Burnout Inventory, (iii) interviews and (iv) observations. These teams were geographically dispersed across the country, covering the North, Centrum and South regions, and heterogeneous: Five palliative care units for inpatients; three home care teams; and one hospital support team. A total of 20 interviews and 240 hours of observations were completed until reaching saturation. Results: The most common ethical decisions were related to communication issues (information disclosure of the diagnosis and prognosis), forgoing treatment and sedation. Although perceived as stressful, emotionally demanding and challenging, ethical decisions were not significantly associated with burnout. Conclusions: Making ethical decisions is not associated with higher burnout levels among professionals working in Portuguese palliative care teams. This can be explained by the interprofessional decision-making process followed by these teams, which promotes a sense of shared-decision and team-based empowerment; and by the advanced level of interdisciplinary education in palliative care that these professionals have.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAmerican Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicineen_US
dc.sourceAmerican Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine [ISSN 1049-9091], v. 33 (8), p. 723-732en_US
dc.subject320105 Psicología clínicaen_US
dc.subject.otherBurnouten_US
dc.subject.otherEnd-of-life careen_US
dc.subject.otherEthical decisionsen_US
dc.subject.otherEthical issuesen_US
dc.subject.otherInterprofessional relationsen_US
dc.subject.otherMixed-methodsen_US
dc.subject.otherPalliative careen_US
dc.subject.otherShared decision makingen_US
dc.titleEthical decisions in palliative care: Interprofessional relations as a burnout protective factor? Results from a mixed-methods multicenter study in Portugalen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/Articlees
dc.typeArticlees
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/1049909115583486
dc.identifier.scopus84981268327-
dc.identifier.isi000382518600002
dc.contributor.authorscopusid16417188300
dc.contributor.authorscopusid24169551000
dc.contributor.authorscopusid38560931500
dc.description.lastpage732-
dc.identifier.issue8-
dc.description.firstpage723-
dc.relation.volume33-
dc.investigacionCiencias de la Saluden_US
dc.type2Artículoen_US
dc.contributor.daisngid31816716
dc.contributor.daisngid1140622
dc.contributor.daisngid1265416
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Hernandez-Marrero, P
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Pereira, SM
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Carvalho, AS
dc.date.coverdateSeptiembre 2016
dc.identifier.ulpgces
dc.description.sjr0,587
dc.description.jcr1,283
dc.description.sjrqQ2
dc.description.jcrqQ4
dc.description.scieSCIE
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextSin texto completo-
Colección:Artículos
Vista resumida

Citas SCOPUSTM   

37
actualizado el 21-abr-2024

Citas de WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

22
actualizado el 20-feb-2022

Visitas

33
actualizado el 15-jul-2023

Google ScholarTM

Verifica

Altmetric


Comparte



Exporta metadatos



Los elementos en ULPGC accedaCRIS están protegidos por derechos de autor con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.