Identificador persistente para citar o vincular este elemento: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/42256
Campo DC Valoridioma
dc.contributor.authorOdden, Aneen_US
dc.contributor.authorVatn, Synnoveen_US
dc.contributor.authorRuiz Reyes, Antonioen_US
dc.contributor.authorRobertson, Lucy Janeen_US
dc.contributor.authorEnemark, Heidi Larsenen_US
dc.contributor.authorNes, Silje Katrineen_US
dc.contributor.authorTommerberg, Vibekeen_US
dc.contributor.authorStuen, Snorreen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-25T09:17:36Z-
dc.date.available2018-10-25T09:17:36Z-
dc.date.issued2018en_US
dc.identifier.issn0044-605Xen_US
dc.identifier.otherWoS-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10553/42256-
dc.description.abstractBackground Iron is an essential nutrient, and iron supplementation has been shown to reduce the incidence of abomasal bloat in lambs. Additionally, iron deficiency is linked to pica, which may increase uptake of Eimeria oocysts. Coccidiosis in sheep, caused by Eimeria spp., is an important infection, leading to reduced welfare and economic losses. The aims of our study were to investigate: (1) the use of iron supplementation in Norwegian sheep flocks using a questionnaire survey, and (2) whether iron supplementation reduced excretion of Eimeria oocysts and increased the growth rates of young lambs. Results A questionnaire regarding the use of iron supplementation, sent to all members of the Norwegian Sheep Recording System (n = 4993), showed that 152/1823 farmers iron-supplemented lambs, either orally (56.7%) or by injection (43.3%). The main purpose of supplementation was to prevent abomasal bloat (38.4%), coccidiosis (9.3%), or both (27.8%). In the field study, 102 twin lambs from five flocks were included: one twin (treated) received 600 mg of gleptoferron subcutaneously within 3 days of birth, whereas the control was given saline. McMaster analysis of individual faecal samples obtained at weekly intervals (n = 4 per lamb, starting at turnout) showed no significant difference in oocyst excretion between treatment groups at any sampling, except for one flock 14 days after turnout. Mean growth rates, measured at iron injection, 21 days after turnout, and in the autumn, differed significantly between treated and untreated lambs from iron injection to 21 days after turnout, however, no difference in growth rates was observed in the overall period from iron injection to autumn. Blood analysis suggested that the controls were at risk of developing iron deficiency anaemia during the housed period, but signs of anaemia were not observed. Conclusion Iron supplementation of lambs was used by 8.3% of the farmers responding to the questionnaire, mainly with the intention to prevent abomasal bloat, coccidiosis, or both. The field trial results indicate that iron supplementation of young lambs do not reduce oocyst excretion and only induced a transitory increase in weight gain. However further studies, including more flocks and possibly repeated iron injections, would provide more definitive information.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisher0044-605X-
dc.relation.ispartofActa Veterinaria Scandinavicaen_US
dc.sourceActa Veterinaria Scandinavica [ISSN 0044-605X], v. 60en_US
dc.subject310907 Patologíaen_US
dc.subject.otherCoccidiosisen_US
dc.subject.otherEimeria spp.en_US
dc.subject.otherIron supplementationen_US
dc.subject.otherNorwayen_US
dc.subject.otherSheepen_US
dc.titleExcretion of Eimeria spp. oocysts in young lambs following iron supplementationen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/Articleen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s13028-018-0404-6en_US
dc.identifier.scopus85052601686-
dc.identifier.isi000443636600001-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid57193265897-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid56079018300-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid57201387360-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid7201408426-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid7004124507-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid55228472500-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid57202832528-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid7003697130-
dc.identifier.eissn1751-0147-
dc.relation.volume60en_US
dc.investigacionCiencias de la Saluden_US
dc.type2Artículoen_US
dc.contributor.daisngid7631748-
dc.contributor.daisngid1843746-
dc.contributor.daisngid1497623-
dc.contributor.daisngid151362-
dc.contributor.daisngid849207-
dc.contributor.daisngid4899632-
dc.contributor.daisngid25904141-
dc.contributor.daisngid461267-
dc.description.numberofpages9en_US
dc.utils.revisionen_US
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Odden, A-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Vatn, S-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Ruiz, A-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Robertson, LJ-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Enemark, HL-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Nes, SK-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Tommerberg, V-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Stuen, S-
dc.date.coverdateAgosto 2018en_US
dc.identifier.ulpgces
dc.description.sjr0,637
dc.description.jcr1,509
dc.description.sjrqQ1
dc.description.jcrqQ2
dc.description.scieSCIE
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextCon texto completo-
crisitem.author.deptGIR Parasitología, dermatologia y biopatologia veterinaria-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Patología Animal, Producción Animal, Bromatología y Tecnología de Los Alimentos-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-0668-5496-
crisitem.author.parentorgDepartamento de Patología Animal, Producción Animal, Bromatología y Tecnología de Los Alimentos-
crisitem.author.fullNameRuiz Reyes, Antonio-
Colección:Artículos
miniatura
Adobe PDF (1,82 MB)
Vista resumida

Citas SCOPUSTM   

4
actualizado el 14-abr-2024

Citas de WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

4
actualizado el 25-feb-2024

Visitas

98
actualizado el 30-mar-2024

Descargas

118
actualizado el 30-mar-2024

Google ScholarTM

Verifica

Altmetric


Comparte



Exporta metadatos



Los elementos en ULPGC accedaCRIS están protegidos por derechos de autor con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.