Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/41814
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDomínguez-Berjón, María Felícitasen_US
dc.contributor.authorGodoy, Pereen_US
dc.contributor.authorRuano-Ravina, Albertoen_US
dc.contributor.authorNegrín, Miguel Angelen_US
dc.contributor.authorVives-Cases, Carmenen_US
dc.contributor.authorÁlvarez-Dardet, Carlosen_US
dc.contributor.authorBermúdez-Tamayo, Claraen_US
dc.contributor.authorLópez, María Joséen_US
dc.contributor.authorPérez, Glòriaen_US
dc.contributor.authorBorrell, Carmeen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-03T11:55:19Z-
dc.date.available2018-09-03T11:55:19Z-
dc.date.issued2018en_US
dc.identifier.issn0898-9621en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10553/41814-
dc.description.abstractPeer review in the scientific publication is widely used as a method to identify valuable knowledge. Editors have the task of selecting appropriate reviewers. We assessed the reasons given by potential reviewers for declining a request to review, and the factors associated with acceptance, taking into account the difference in the sex of the reviewer. This is a descriptive study of the review requests from a public health journal (Gaceta Sanitaria) with an enforced gender policy. The dependent variables were requests, response to requests, reasons potential reviewers gave for declining requests and time to review. We carried out a descriptive analysis of these indicators and applied logistic regression to analyze factors (professional and research/review experience) associated with having done at least one review in 2014-2015. Results were stratified by sex. Journal editors sent 1,775 requests to 773 potential reviewers; 52.3% of whom reviewed at least one manuscript. Of the 396 declined requests (22.3%), the most common reasons were lack of time and of experience (88.1%). No differences were observed by sex. In the multivariate analysis, having reviewed for the journal in previous years showed the strongest association with acceptance. Specific analyses of data on requests reviewers may be useful for improving the acceptance rates to review. This study did not show gender differences in several indicators of the reviewing process.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAccountability in Researchen_US
dc.sourceAccountability in Research [ISSN 0898-9621], v. 25 (2), p. 94-108en_US
dc.subject32 Ciencias médicasen_US
dc.subject570106 Documentaciónen_US
dc.subject.otherEditorial policyen_US
dc.subject.otherGenderen_US
dc.subject.otherPeer reviewen_US
dc.subject.otherScientific publicationsen_US
dc.titleAcceptance or decline of requests to review manuscripts: A gender-based approach from a public health journalen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/Articleen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/08989621.2018.1435280en_US
dc.identifier.scopus85042382515-
dc.identifier.isi000426896000003-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid57201259634-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid55222534000-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid55959290000-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid9249657200-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid8656009400-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid7005766954-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid6506537446-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid37000868400-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid6507639589-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid7005748189-
dc.description.lastpage108en_US
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.description.firstpage94en_US
dc.relation.volume25en_US
dc.investigacionCiencias Sociales y Jurídicasen_US
dc.type2Artículoen_US
dc.contributor.daisngid32788452-
dc.contributor.daisngid144751-
dc.contributor.daisngid296289-
dc.contributor.daisngid31500350-
dc.contributor.daisngid31903760-
dc.contributor.daisngid31498697-
dc.contributor.daisngid1520820-
dc.contributor.daisngid7284111-
dc.contributor.daisngid369592-
dc.contributor.daisngid46581-
dc.utils.revisionen_US
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Dominguez-Berjon, MF-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Godoy, P-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Ruano-Ravina, A-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Negrin, MA-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Vives-Cases, C-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Alvarez-Dardet, C-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Bermudez-Tamayo, C-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Lopez, MJ-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Perez, G-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Borrell, C-
dc.date.coverdateFebrero 2018en_US
dc.identifier.ulpgcen_US
dc.contributor.buulpgcBU-ECOen_US
dc.description.sjr0,455
dc.description.jcr1,609
dc.description.sjrqQ2
dc.description.jcrqQ2
dc.description.scieSCIE
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextSin texto completo-
crisitem.author.deptGIR Técnicas estadísticas bayesianas y de decisión en la economía y empresa-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Turismo y Desarrollo Económico Sostenible-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Métodos Cuantitativos en Economía y Gestión-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-7074-6268-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Turismo y Desarrollo Económico Sostenible-
crisitem.author.fullNameNegrín Hernández, Miguel Ángel-
Appears in Collections:Artículos
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

7
checked on Jun 19, 2022

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

5
checked on Jun 19, 2022

Page view(s)

14
checked on Jun 4, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Share



Export metadata



Items in accedaCRIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.