Identificador persistente para citar o vincular este elemento: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/41398
Campo DC Valoridioma
dc.contributor.authorLeite, Lauraen_US
dc.contributor.authorPita, Cristinaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-27T10:37:12Z-
dc.date.available2018-06-27T10:37:12Z-
dc.date.issued2016en_US
dc.identifier.issn0308-597Xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10553/41398-
dc.description.abstractPromoting and attaining sustainable use of resources through community participation is a central tenet of the European Union's (EU) 2013 Reform of the Common Fisheries Policy. A systematic review approach was used to identify participatory fisheries management arrangements within the EU. Following this, the participatory arrangements were categorized based on the nature of the decision-making arrangement, influence and empowerment of the fishing industry. The study identified 40 management arrangements distributed through 8 member states, with a variety of fisheries and institutional settings for participation in fisheries management in the EU. The majority of the partnerships identified are “Functional participation”, i.e., the participatory arrangement is based in pre-determined goals encouraged by higher decision-making levels in order to increase efficiency of management decisions. Interactive partnership was the highest level of participation identified in the systematic review, and is usually more conducive with local arrangements in coastal and small-scale fisheries targeting low mobility species.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofMarine Policyen_US
dc.sourceMarine Policy [ISSN 0308-597X], v. 74, p. 268-278en_US
dc.subject2401 Biología animal (zoología)en_US
dc.subject.otherCommon Fisheries Policyen_US
dc.subject.otherEuropean Unionen_US
dc.subject.otherFisheries managementen_US
dc.subject.otherFishersen_US
dc.subject.otherParticipationen_US
dc.titleReview of participatory fisheries management arrangements in the European Unionen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/Articlees
dc.typeArticlees
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.marpol.2016.08.003
dc.identifier.scopus84992026544-
dc.identifier.isi000390494100032-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid57213052748
dc.contributor.authorscopusid36832195100
dc.description.lastpage278-
dc.description.firstpage268-
dc.relation.volume74-
dc.investigacionCiencias Sociales y Jurídicasen_US
dc.type2Artículoen_US
dc.contributor.daisngid2129367
dc.contributor.daisngid920269
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Leite, L
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Pita, C
dc.date.coverdateDiciembre 2016
dc.identifier.ulpgces
dc.description.sjr1,335
dc.description.jcr2,235
dc.description.sjrqQ1
dc.description.jcrqQ1
dc.description.ssciSSCI
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextSin texto completo-
Colección:Artículos
Vista resumida

Citas SCOPUSTM   

29
actualizado el 01-dic-2024

Citas de WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

29
actualizado el 24-nov-2024

Visitas

38
actualizado el 17-feb-2024

Google ScholarTM

Verifica

Altmetric


Comparte



Exporta metadatos



Los elementos en ULPGC accedaCRIS están protegidos por derechos de autor con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.