Identificador persistente para citar o vincular este elemento: https://accedacris.ulpgc.es/jspui/handle/10553/157052
Campo DC Valoridioma
dc.contributor.authorCossa, Damboiaen_US
dc.contributor.authorCossa, Mindaen_US
dc.contributor.authorNhaca, Jeremiasen_US
dc.contributor.authorTimba, Ilárioen_US
dc.contributor.authorChunguane, Yudmilaen_US
dc.contributor.authorVetina, Alvaroen_US
dc.contributor.authorMacia, Adrianoen_US
dc.contributor.authorGullström, Martinen_US
dc.contributor.authorInfantes Oanes, Eduardoen_US
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-04T14:10:20Z-
dc.date.available2026-02-04T14:10:20Z-
dc.date.issued2025en_US
dc.identifier.issn1061-2971en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://accedacris.ulpgc.es/jspui/handle/10553/157052-
dc.description.abstractSeagrass provides a crucial habitat for numerous marine species and serves as a vital food source for endangered species, like dugongs. While extensive research on restoration has been conducted on certain temperate and slow-growing climax seagrass species, limited attention has been given to tropical pioneer species. This study aimed to assess and compare two restoration methods for the pioneer seagrass Halodule uninervis and evaluate their potential for biodiversity recovery after planting. We conducted a field experiment at subtropical Inhaca Island, southern Mozambique, testing the efficiency of two planting methods (plugs and single shoots) and two planting densities (~100 and ~300 shoots/m2). We monitored seagrass shoot density in two sites for 16 months, and benthic macrofauna density for 12 months. Results demonstrated that seagrass could grow in all combinations of planting methods and densities in both sites. Specifically, the single shoot method at the high-density treatment proved the most effective, resulting in approximately 1000 shoots/m2 within a year. Faunal densities, primarily dominated by polychaetes followed by malacostraca, bivalves, and gastropods, indicated rapid colonization of the planted areas, especially in the high-density treatments. Our findings suggest that restoring H. uninervis is feasible using the two tested planting methods. This is particularly significant because H. uninervis is a preferred dugong food source, and its decline due to anthropogenic activities could be reversed through restoration efforts. Nonetheless, conserving existing seagrass should be the primary focus, and restoration approaches should be employed as a valuable tool for managing coastal areas.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofRestoration Ecologyen_US
dc.sourceRestoration Ecology [ISSN 1061-2971], v. 33, n. 3 (Marzo 2025)en_US
dc.subject251004 Botánica marinaen_US
dc.subject.otherCoastal habitat managementen_US
dc.subject.otherHalodule uninervis restorationen_US
dc.subject.otherInfauna colonizationen_US
dc.subject.otherSeagrass biodiversity recoveryen_US
dc.subject.otherSeagrass restoration techniquesen_US
dc.titleRestoring Halodule uninervis: evaluating planting methods and biodiversityen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/rec.14382en_US
dc.identifier.issue3-
dc.relation.volume33en_US
dc.investigacionCienciasen_US
dc.type2Artículoen_US
dc.description.numberofpages11en_US
dc.utils.revisionen_US
dc.date.coverdateMarzo 2025en_US
dc.identifier.ulpgcNoen_US
dc.contributor.buulpgcBU-BASen_US
dc.description.sjr1,167
dc.description.jcr2,7
dc.description.sjrqQ1
dc.description.jcrqQ2
dc.description.scieSCIE
dc.description.miaricds10,9
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextCon texto completo-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Biología-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-9724-9237-
crisitem.author.fullNameInfantes Oanes, Eduardo-
Colección:Artículos
Adobe PDF (620,79 kB)
Vista resumida

Citas de WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

1
actualizado el 15-feb-2026

Google ScholarTM

Verifica

Altmetric


Comparte



Exporta metadatos



Los elementos en ULPGC accedaCRIS están protegidos por derechos de autor con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.