Identificador persistente para citar o vincular este elemento: https://accedacris.ulpgc.es/jspui/handle/10553/156566
Campo DC Valoridioma
dc.contributor.authorEriander, Louiseen_US
dc.contributor.authorInfantes Oanes, Eduardoen_US
dc.contributor.authorOlofsson, Malinen_US
dc.contributor.authorOlsen, Jeanine L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMoksnes, Per-Olaven_US
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-30T15:48:53Z-
dc.date.available2026-01-30T15:48:53Z-
dc.date.issued2016en_US
dc.identifier.issn0022-0981en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://accedacris.ulpgc.es/jspui/handle/10553/156566-
dc.description.abstractMore than 50% of eelgrass habitats have disappeared from the Swedish NW coast in the last 30 years. Restoration is being proposed to assist recovery but little is known regarding methods suitable under Scandinavian conditions; e.g. short growing seasons and scouring by ice. In the present study we evaluated different restoration methods using shoots and seeds in a Swedish fjord and assessed if eelgrass could be successfully transplanted between sites with different depth and exposure. The study demonstrates that both shoot- and seed methods can be successfully used to restore eelgrass at this latitude. Survival and growth of unanchored single shoots, transplanted without sediment in shallow habitats (1.0–1.5 m) was very high (> 500% increase in shoot density after 14 months). This restoration method showed 2–3.5 times higher growth rate and was 2–2.5 times faster compared with shoots anchored in the sediment and shoots transplanted in sediment cores, respectively, and is recommended for shallow habitats in Sweden. Growth within deeper habitats (3.0–4.5 m) was substantially lower (40% loss to 50% increase) due to light limitations and high winter mortality. Restoration using seeds distributed from mesh-bags showed very low seedling establishment rates (approximately 1%) making this method less cost-effective than transplanting single shoots in shallow habitats. However, growth of seedlings was high and this method is recommended for deep habitats with soft sediment where shoot transplantation is difficult. Despite dramatic differences in eelgrass morphology between habitats with different depth and exposure, all shoots within a planting site had the same morphology at the end of the study, independent of origin. A baseline genetic survey supported that the observed changes in morphology of transplants were due to a plastic response, suggesting that donor populations do not have to exactly match the morphology of the plants targeted for restoration.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecologyen_US
dc.sourceJournal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology [ISSN 0022-0981], v. 479, p. 76-88 (Junio 2016)en_US
dc.subject251004 Botánica marinaen_US
dc.subject251001 Oceanografía biológicaen_US
dc.subject.otherEelgrassen_US
dc.subject.otherRestorationen_US
dc.subject.otherHigh latitudeen_US
dc.subject.otherMethod assessmenten_US
dc.subject.otherCross-transplantationen_US
dc.subject.otherSeedsen_US
dc.titleAssessing methods for restoration of eelgrass (Zostera marina L.) in a cold temperate regionen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jembe.2016.03.005en_US
dc.description.lastpage88en_US
dc.description.firstpage76en_US
dc.relation.volume479en_US
dc.investigacionCienciasen_US
dc.type2Artículoen_US
dc.description.numberofpages13en_US
dc.utils.revisionen_US
dc.date.coverdateJunio 2016en_US
dc.identifier.ulpgcNoen_US
dc.contributor.buulpgcBU-BASen_US
item.fulltextSin texto completo-
item.grantfulltextnone-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Biología-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-9724-9237-
crisitem.author.fullNameInfantes Oanes, Eduardo-
Colección:Artículos
Vista resumida

Google ScholarTM

Verifica

Altmetric


Comparte



Exporta metadatos



Los elementos en ULPGC accedaCRIS están protegidos por derechos de autor con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.