Identificador persistente para citar o vincular este elemento: https://accedacris.ulpgc.es/jspui/handle/10553/154939
Campo DC Valoridioma
dc.contributor.authorSimbaña Rivera, Katherine Lizethen_US
dc.contributor.authorJaramillo-Aguilar, Damary S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorAlmeida Arteaga, Victor Hugoen_US
dc.contributor.authorRuales Estupinan, Joseen_US
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-13T18:41:44Z-
dc.date.available2026-01-13T18:41:44Z-
dc.date.issued2025en_US
dc.identifier.issn1472-6939en_US
dc.identifier.otherWoS-
dc.identifier.urihttps://accedacris.ulpgc.es/jspui/handle/10553/154939-
dc.description.abstractBackgroundEthical regulation of biomedical research is essential to safeguard the rights and well-being of participants. In Ecuador, Research Ethics Committees (RECs) have undergone progressive growth. This study describes and evaluates the performance of the RECs of Ecuador using the first standardized registry of approved research studies implemented by the Ministry of Public Health.MethodsAn observational, descriptive, and retrospective study was conducted using administrative records corresponding to the first year of implementation of the First Standardized Registry of Approved Research Studies (September 2021-October 2022). All functional RECs and approved research projects were included, characterizing variables related to geographical distribution, institutional affiliation, researcher profiles, study type, review modality, response times, and protocol follow-up.ResultsA total of 957 projects approved by 21 RECs were evaluated. Of these, 52% were concentrated in Quito, and 62% were affiliated with higher education institutions. Most studies were observational (96%), with a predominance in Medicine and Nursing (63%), followed by Psychology (15%) and Sociology (10%). Geographical distribution revealed a high concentration in Azuay (52%) and Pichincha (43%). Only 3% of the projects had a unique identification code, 40% involved vulnerable populations, and 9% used biological samples. The average waiting time to obtain a resolution was 31 days (95% CI: 28.5-34.2).ConclusionsDespite regulatory advancements and the implementation of the First Standardized Registry of Approved Research Studies, challenges persist in terms of decentralization, operational efficiency, and follow-up. Optimizing the regulatory framework, strengthening RECs training, and fostering public-private collaboration are crucial to consolidating a robust and adaptable ethical system capable of addressing emerging challenges.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofBMC Medical Ethicsen_US
dc.sourceBmc Medical Ethics[ISSN 1472-6939],v. 26 (1), (Noviembre 2025)en_US
dc.subject32 Ciencias médicasen_US
dc.subject71 Éticaen_US
dc.subject.otherPerspectivesen_US
dc.subject.otherResearch Ethics Committeesen_US
dc.subject.otherBiomedical Researchen_US
dc.subject.otherLegislationen_US
dc.subject.otherEcuadoren_US
dc.titleEvaluation of the first standardized registry of approved research studies by the research ethics committees in Ecuadoren_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/Articleen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12910-025-01351-wen_US
dc.identifier.scopus105026210821-
dc.identifier.isi001650383900001-
dc.contributor.orcidNO DATA-
dc.contributor.orcidNO DATA-
dc.contributor.orcidNO DATA-
dc.contributor.orcidNO DATA-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid57208107136-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid57239473500-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid57981247900-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid60260986100-
dc.identifier.eissn1472-6939-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.relation.volume26en_US
dc.investigacionCiencias de la Saluden_US
dc.type2Artículoen_US
dc.contributor.daisngid46511297-
dc.contributor.daisngid85863971-
dc.contributor.daisngid40356978-
dc.contributor.daisngid87485203-
dc.description.numberofpages10en_US
dc.utils.revisionen_US
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Simbaña-Rivera, K-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Jaramillo-Aguilar, DS-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Arteaga, VHA-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Estupiñán, JR-
dc.date.coverdateNoviembre 2025en_US
dc.identifier.ulpgcen_US
dc.contributor.buulpgcBU-MEDen_US
dc.description.sjr0,975
dc.description.jcr3,0
dc.description.sjrqQ1
dc.description.jcrqQ1
dc.description.scieSCIE
dc.description.ssciSSCI
dc.description.miaricds10,8
item.fulltextCon texto completo-
item.grantfulltextopen-
crisitem.author.deptGIR IUIBS: Medio Ambiente y Salud-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Investigaciones Biomédicas y Sanitarias-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-8130-5361-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Investigaciones Biomédicas y Sanitarias-
crisitem.author.fullNameSimbaña Rivera, Katherine Lizeth-
Colección:Artículos
Adobe PDF (1,41 MB)
Vista resumida

Google ScholarTM

Verifica

Altmetric


Comparte



Exporta metadatos



Los elementos en ULPGC accedaCRIS están protegidos por derechos de autor con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.