Identificador persistente para citar o vincular este elemento: https://accedacris.ulpgc.es/jspui/handle/10553/153796
Campo DC Valoridioma
dc.contributor.authorDorta González, Pabloen_US
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-17T08:48:14Z-
dc.date.available2025-12-17T08:48:14Z-
dc.date.issued2025en_US
dc.identifier.issn0302-3427en_US
dc.identifier.otherWoS-
dc.identifier.urihttps://accedacris.ulpgc.es/jspui/handle/10553/153796-
dc.description.abstractThis study examines the use of evidence in policymaking by analysing a range of journal and article attributes, as well as online engagement metrics. It employs a large-scale citation analysis of nearly 150 000 articles covering diverse policy topics. The findings highlight that scholarly citations exert the strongest positive influence on policy citations. Articles from journals with a higher citation impact and larger Mendeley readership are cited more frequently in policy documents. Other online engagements, such as news and blog mentions, also boost policy citations, while mentions on social media X have a negative effect. The finding that highly cited and widely read papers are also frequently referenced in policy documents likely reflects the perception among policymakers that such research is more trustworthy. In contrast, papers that derive their influence primarily from social media tend to be cited less often in policy contexts.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofScience and Public Policyen_US
dc.sourceScience And Public Policy[ISSN 0302-3427], (2025)en_US
dc.subject570106 Documentaciónen_US
dc.subject.otherSocietal Impacten_US
dc.subject.otherScienceen_US
dc.subject.otherDocumentsen_US
dc.subject.otherPolicy Researchen_US
dc.subject.otherPolicy Documentsen_US
dc.subject.otherPolicymakingen_US
dc.subject.otherAltmetricsen_US
dc.subject.otherJournal Prestigeen_US
dc.subject.otherImpact Factoren_US
dc.subject.otherOpen Accessen_US
dc.subject.otherSocial Mediaen_US
dc.titleWhich kind of research papers influence policymakingen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/Articleen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/scipol/scaf069en_US
dc.identifier.isi001620296100001-
dc.identifier.eissn1471-5430-
dc.investigacionCiencias Sociales y Jurídicasen_US
dc.type2Artículoen_US
dc.description.numberofpages13en_US
dc.utils.revisionen_US
dc.date.coverdate2025en_US
dc.identifier.ulpgcen_US
dc.contributor.buulpgcBU-ECOen_US
dc.description.sjr0,823
dc.description.jcr2,6
dc.description.sjrqQ1
dc.description.jcrqQ2
dc.description.ssciSSCI
dc.description.miaricds11,0
item.fulltextCon texto completo-
item.grantfulltextopen-
crisitem.author.deptGIR TIDES- Técnicas estadísticas bayesianas y de decisión en la economía y empresa-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Turismo y Desarrollo Económico Sostenible-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Métodos Cuantitativos en Economía y Gestión-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-0494-2903-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Turismo y Desarrollo Económico Sostenible-
crisitem.author.fullNameDorta González, Pablo-
Colección:Artículos
Adobe PDF (4,52 MB)
Vista resumida

Visitas

3
actualizado el 11-ene-2026

Google ScholarTM

Verifica

Altmetric


Comparte



Exporta metadatos



Los elementos en ULPGC accedaCRIS están protegidos por derechos de autor con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.