Identificador persistente para citar o vincular este elemento: https://accedacris.ulpgc.es/jspui/handle/10553/151900
Campo DC Valoridioma
dc.contributor.authorSocrate, Julianaen_US
dc.contributor.authorArmoskaite, Aurelijaen_US
dc.contributor.authorCordero Penín, Víctoren_US
dc.contributor.authorGutierrez, Deboraen_US
dc.contributor.authorVon Thenen, Miriamen_US
dc.date.accessioned2025-11-17T13:44:15Z-
dc.date.available2025-11-17T13:44:15Z-
dc.date.issued2025en_US
dc.identifier.issn0044-7447en_US
dc.identifier.otherWoS-
dc.identifier.urihttps://accedacris.ulpgc.es/jspui/handle/10553/151900-
dc.description.abstractEcosystem service assessments (ESA) are widely used to support marine management, yet their application varies across regions due to differences in governance frameworks, data availability, and methodological approaches. This study systematically reviews ESA methods and tools applied in offshore areas of the Baltic Sea, South Atlantic Ocean, and Western Mediterranean Sea, evaluating their effectiveness in supporting sustainable marine management with a specific focus on offshore wind farms, marine protected areas, and fishing activities. The findings reveal geographical variations in ESA implementation, highlighting strengths and limitations in their ability to inform policy and decision-making. While methodological diversity enhances ESA's capacity to capture complex socio-ecological interactions, inconsistencies in application reduce its effectiveness. Addressing these gaps requires refining methodological approaches, strengthening interdisciplinary collaboration, and improving the link between ESA and marine governance. This research provides insights into the current state of ESA applications and offers recommendations for enhancing their role in ecosystem-based marine planning and policy integration.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAmbioen_US
dc.sourceAmbio [ISSN 0044-7447], (2025)en_US
dc.subject2510 Oceanografíaen_US
dc.subject.otherBaltic Seaen_US
dc.subject.otherManagementen_US
dc.subject.otherImplementationen_US
dc.subject.otherConservationen_US
dc.subject.otherChallengesen_US
dc.subject.otherContributeen_US
dc.subject.otherValuesen_US
dc.subject.otherWorldsen_US
dc.subject.otherEcosystem service assessmentsen_US
dc.subject.otherEvaluation of effectivenessen_US
dc.subject.otherMarine ecosystemsen_US
dc.subject.otherRegional comparisonsen_US
dc.subject.otherSustainable marine planningen_US
dc.titleTowards improved ecosystem service assessments in marine systems: a systematic review and evaluation of effectivenessen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/Articleen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s13280-025-02299-2en_US
dc.identifier.isi001609478900001-
dc.identifier.eissn1654-7209-
dc.investigacionCienciasen_US
dc.type2Artículoen_US
dc.contributor.daisngidNo ID-
dc.contributor.daisngidNo ID-
dc.contributor.daisngidNo ID-
dc.contributor.daisngidNo ID-
dc.contributor.daisngidNo ID-
dc.description.numberofpages19en_US
dc.utils.revisionen_US
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Socrate, J-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Armoskaite, A-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Penín, VC-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Gutierrez, D-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Von Thenen, M-
dc.date.coverdateNoviembre 2025en_US
dc.identifier.ulpgcen_US
dc.contributor.buulpgcBU-BASen_US
dc.description.sjr1,786
dc.description.jcr5,8
dc.description.sjrqQ1
dc.description.jcrqQ1
dc.description.scieSCIE
dc.description.miaricds11,0
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextCon texto completo-
crisitem.author.deptGIR ECOAQUA: Biodiversidad y Conservación-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Investigación en Acuicultura Sostenible y Ec-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Investigación en Acuicultura Sostenible y Ec-
crisitem.author.fullNameCordero Penín, Víctor-
Colección:Artículos
Adobe PDF (2,15 MB)
Vista resumida

Google ScholarTM

Verifica

Altmetric


Comparte



Exporta metadatos



Los elementos en ULPGC accedaCRIS están protegidos por derechos de autor con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.