Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://accedacris.ulpgc.es/jspui/handle/10553/143635
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorGracia Molina, Anselmo-
dc.contributor.advisorFrías Álvarez, Ariadna-
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez Riquelme, Beatriz-
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-27T20:04:54Z-
dc.date.available2025-07-27T20:04:54Z-
dc.date.issued2025en_US
dc.identifier.otherGestión académica
dc.identifier.urihttps://accedacris.ulpgc.es/handle/10553/143635-
dc.description.abstractThe efficient production of brood frames is critical for nucleus colony establishment, colony reinforcement, disease risk mitigation, and high-population colonies with specialized production goals. This study evaluated two hive systems designed for brood frame production: a two-queen colony (Hive A) and a three-queen colony (Hive B). The proposed system implements a 10-day production cycle: capped brood frames are removed from the super every 10 days for use in other colonies, while uncapped brood frames from the hive body are moved into the super; these are subsequently removed after 10 days for further colony support. Hive A consisted of a divided 10 frame hive with two 5-frame compartments, each containing a mated queen, topped by a 10-frame honey super separated from the brood chamber by a queen excluder. Hive B consisted of a base of three nucleus colonies (each with a mated queen) with two 10-frame supers above and separated from the nuclei by two queen excluders. Over a 58-day period, Hive A produced 19 brood frames and 9 food frames, demonstrating stable productivity. In contrast, Hive B failed to stabilize and produced no brood frames by the study’s conclusion. These results indicate that the two-queen system is a viable and efficient method for brood frame production, while the three-queen system requires further optimization to address instability challenges.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.subject310401 Apiculturaen_US
dc.titleProduction of brood frames in bee (Apis mellifera) coloniesen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesisen_US
dc.typeBachelorThesisen_US
dc.contributor.departamentoDepartamento de Patología Animal, Producción Animal, Bromatología y Tecnología de Los Alimentosen_US
dc.contributor.facultadFacultad de Veterinariaen_US
dc.investigacionCiencias de la Saluden_US
dc.type2Trabajo final de gradoen_US
dc.utils.revisionen_US
dc.identifier.matriculaTFT-33287
dc.identifier.ulpgcen_US
dc.contributor.buulpgcBU-VETen_US
dc.contributor.titulacionGrado en Veterinaria
item.fulltextSin texto completo-
item.grantfulltextnone-
crisitem.advisor.deptGIR IUSA-ONEHEALTH 5: Reproducción Animal, Oncología y Anestesiología Comparadas-
crisitem.advisor.deptIU de Sanidad Animal y Seguridad Alimentaria-
crisitem.advisor.deptDepartamento de Patología Animal, Producción Animal, Bromatología y Tecnología de Los Alimentos-
crisitem.advisor.deptGIR IUSA-ONEHEALTH 5: Reproducción Animal, Oncología y Anestesiología Comparadas-
crisitem.advisor.deptIU de Sanidad Animal y Seguridad Alimentaria-
Appears in Collections:Trabajo final de grado
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

92
checked on Jan 16, 2026

Google ScholarTM

Check


Share



Export metadata



Items in accedaCRIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.