Identificador persistente para citar o vincular este elemento: https://accedacris.ulpgc.es/jspui/handle/10553/143635
Campo DC Valoridioma
dc.contributor.advisorGracia Molina, Anselmo-
dc.contributor.advisorFrías Álvarez, Ariadna-
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez Riquelme, Beatriz-
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-27T20:04:54Z-
dc.date.available2025-07-27T20:04:54Z-
dc.date.issued2025en_US
dc.identifier.otherGestión académica
dc.identifier.urihttps://accedacris.ulpgc.es/handle/10553/143635-
dc.description.abstractThe efficient production of brood frames is critical for nucleus colony establishment, colony reinforcement, disease risk mitigation, and high-population colonies with specialized production goals. This study evaluated two hive systems designed for brood frame production: a two-queen colony (Hive A) and a three-queen colony (Hive B). The proposed system implements a 10-day production cycle: capped brood frames are removed from the super every 10 days for use in other colonies, while uncapped brood frames from the hive body are moved into the super; these are subsequently removed after 10 days for further colony support. Hive A consisted of a divided 10 frame hive with two 5-frame compartments, each containing a mated queen, topped by a 10-frame honey super separated from the brood chamber by a queen excluder. Hive B consisted of a base of three nucleus colonies (each with a mated queen) with two 10-frame supers above and separated from the nuclei by two queen excluders. Over a 58-day period, Hive A produced 19 brood frames and 9 food frames, demonstrating stable productivity. In contrast, Hive B failed to stabilize and produced no brood frames by the study’s conclusion. These results indicate that the two-queen system is a viable and efficient method for brood frame production, while the three-queen system requires further optimization to address instability challenges.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.subject310401 Apiculturaen_US
dc.titleProduction of brood frames in bee (Apis mellifera) coloniesen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesisen_US
dc.typeBachelorThesisen_US
dc.contributor.departamentoDepartamento de Patología Animal, Producción Animal, Bromatología y Tecnología de Los Alimentosen_US
dc.contributor.facultadFacultad de Veterinariaen_US
dc.investigacionCiencias de la Saluden_US
dc.type2Trabajo final de gradoen_US
dc.utils.revisionen_US
dc.identifier.matriculaTFT-33287
dc.identifier.ulpgcen_US
dc.contributor.buulpgcBU-VETen_US
dc.contributor.titulacionGrado en Veterinaria
item.fulltextSin texto completo-
item.grantfulltextnone-
crisitem.advisor.deptGIR IUSA-ONEHEALTH 5: Reproducción Animal, Oncología y Anestesiología Comparadas-
crisitem.advisor.deptIU de Sanidad Animal y Seguridad Alimentaria-
crisitem.advisor.deptDepartamento de Patología Animal, Producción Animal, Bromatología y Tecnología de Los Alimentos-
crisitem.advisor.deptGIR IUSA-ONEHEALTH 5: Reproducción Animal, Oncología y Anestesiología Comparadas-
crisitem.advisor.deptIU de Sanidad Animal y Seguridad Alimentaria-
Colección:Trabajo final de grado
Vista resumida

Visitas

92
actualizado el 16-ene-2026

Google ScholarTM

Verifica


Comparte



Exporta metadatos



Los elementos en ULPGC accedaCRIS están protegidos por derechos de autor con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.