Identificador persistente para citar o vincular este elemento: https://accedacris.ulpgc.es/handle/10553/143157
Campo DC Valoridioma
dc.contributor.authorCosme De Esteban, Marcialen_US
dc.contributor.authorTuya, Fernandoen_US
dc.contributor.authorHaroun, Ricardoen_US
dc.contributor.authorOtero-Ferrer, Franciscoen_US
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-21T12:49:38Z-
dc.date.available2025-07-21T12:49:38Z-
dc.date.issued2025en_US
dc.identifier.issn2072-4292en_US
dc.identifier.otherScopus-
dc.identifier.urihttps://accedacris.ulpgc.es/handle/10553/143157-
dc.description.abstractMapping marine habitats is fundamental for biodiversity conservation and ecosystem-based management in oceanic regions under increasing anthropogenic and climatic pressures. In the context of global initiatives—such as marine protected area expansion and international agreements—habitat mapping has become mandatory for regional and global conservation policies. It provides spatial data to delineate essential habitats, support connectivity analyses, and assess pressures, enabling ecosystem-based marine spatial planning aligned with EU directives (2008/56/EC; 2014/89/EU). Beyond biodiversity, macrophytes, rhodolith beds, and coral reefs deliver key ecosystem services—carbon sequestration, coastal protection, nursery functions, and fisheries support—essential to local socioeconomies. This systematic review (PRISMA guidelines) examined 69 peer-reviewed studies across Central-Eastern Atlantic archipelagos (Macaronesia: the Azores, Madeira, the Canaries, and Cabo Verde) and the Mid-Atlantic Ridge. We identified knowledge gaps, methodological trends, and key challenges, emphasizing the integration of cartographic, ecological, and technological approaches. Although methodologies diversified over time, the lack of survey standardization, limited ground truthing, and heterogeneous datasets constrained the production of high-resolution bionomic maps. Regional disparities persist in technology access and habitat coverage. The Azores showed the highest species richness (393), dominated by acoustic mapping in corals. Madeira was most advanced in the remote mapping of rhodoliths; the Canaries focused on shallow macrophytes with direct mapping; and Cabo Verde remains underrepresented. Harmonized protocols and regional cooperation are needed to improve data interoperability and predictive modeling.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relationProject 101093910 - Ocean Citizenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofRemote Sensingen_US
dc.sourceRemote Sensing [EISSN 2072-4292], v. 17 (13), (Julio 2025)en_US
dc.subject251001 Oceanografía biológicaen_US
dc.subject251004 Botánica marinaen_US
dc.subject.otherCoastal ecosystemsen_US
dc.subject.otherCoralsen_US
dc.subject.otherHabitat mappingen_US
dc.subject.otherMacrophyte bedsen_US
dc.subject.otherRemote sensingen_US
dc.subject.otherRhodolith dedsen_US
dc.titleA systematic review of marine habitat mapping in the central-eastern Atlantic archipelagos: methodologies, current trends, and knowledge gapsen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/rs17132331en_US
dc.identifier.scopus105010306619-
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-7759-4367-
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-8316-5887-
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-1348-692X-
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-1328-9662-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid57204909895-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid6603608107-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid6603827643-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid36198777000-
dc.identifier.eissn2072-4292-
dc.identifier.issue13-
dc.relation.volume17en_US
dc.investigacionCienciasen_US
dc.type2Artículoen_US
dc.description.numberofpages49en_US
dc.utils.revisionen_US
dc.date.coverdateJulio 2025en_US
dc.identifier.ulpgcen_US
dc.contributor.buulpgcBU-BASen_US
dc.description.sjr1,091
dc.description.jcr4,2
dc.description.sjrqQ1
dc.description.jcrqQ1
dc.description.scieSCIE
dc.description.miaricds10,6
item.fulltextCon texto completo-
item.grantfulltextopen-
crisitem.author.deptGIR ECOAQUA: Biodiversidad y Conservación-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Investigación en Acuicultura Sostenible y Ec-
crisitem.author.deptGIR ECOAQUA: Biodiversidad y Conservación-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Investigación en Acuicultura Sostenible y Ec-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Biología-
crisitem.author.deptGIR ECOAQUA: Biodiversidad y Conservación-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Investigación en Acuicultura Sostenible y Ec-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Biología-
crisitem.author.deptGIR ECOAQUA: Biodiversidad y Conservación-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Investigación en Acuicultura Sostenible y Ec-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Biología-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-8316-5887-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-1348-692X-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-1328-9662-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Investigación en Acuicultura Sostenible y Ec-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Investigación en Acuicultura Sostenible y Ec-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Investigación en Acuicultura Sostenible y Ec-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Investigación en Acuicultura Sostenible y Ec-
crisitem.author.fullNameCosme De Esteban, Marcial-
crisitem.author.fullNameTuya Cortés, Fernando José-
crisitem.author.fullNameHaroun Tabraue, Ricardo Jesús-
crisitem.author.fullNameOtero Ferrer, Francisco José-
crisitem.project.principalinvestigatorHaroun Tabraue, Ricardo Jesús-
Colección:Artículos
Adobe PDF (11,34 MB)
Vista resumida

Google ScholarTM

Verifica

Altmetric


Comparte



Exporta metadatos



Los elementos en ULPGC accedaCRIS están protegidos por derechos de autor con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.