Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://accedacris.ulpgc.es/jspui/handle/10553/139381
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMacías Montes, Anaen_US
dc.contributor.authorPérez Luzardo, Octavio Luisen_US
dc.contributor.authorZaccaroni, Annalisaen_US
dc.contributor.authorAcosta Dacal, Andrea Carolinaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2025-06-03T14:17:55Z-
dc.date.available2025-06-03T14:17:55Z-
dc.date.issued2025en_US
dc.identifier.issn0021-9673en_US
dc.identifier.otherScopus-
dc.identifier.urihttps://accedacris.ulpgc.es/handle/10553/139381-
dc.description.abstractAddressing pesticide residues in feed for cats and dogs is essential to assess their potential impact on their health. In this study, we validated a QuEChERS-based multi-residue method for analyzing 211 pesticide residues in cat and dog feed by LC-MS/MS and GC–MS/MS. To overcome the challenges posed by the complex nature of pet feed, we refined the clean-up step, comparing PSA, EMR-Lipid, and freezing approaches. Freeze-out yielded the best results, with 91.9 % of analytes achieving recoveries within 70–120 % and RSDs≤20 %, and two freezing cycles proved sufficient for effective matrix removal while maintaining analyte recoveries. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first validated QuEChERS method to use freezing-out as a standalone clean-up strategy, offering a simplified and cost-effective solution for high-fat matrices. The method was validated in terms of linearity, accuracy, and precision. Matrix-matched calibration curves (R² ≥ 0.99) were used for all analytes. Recoveries were within 70–120 % for all spiking levels in most compounds, with a few analytes showing recoveries between 60–130 % in the extended range allowed by SANTE guidelines. All RSDs were below 20 % by established validation guidelines. The method demonstrated high sensitivity, with most analytes achieving limits of quantification below the generic 10.0 µg/kg MRL established by EU regulations for feed. Notably, over 70 % of analytes achieved LOQs at least ten times lower. All limits of detection were equal to or below 10.0 µg/kg. The method’s applicability was demonstrated by analyzing 16 commercial pet feed samples, where 112 residues of 39 pesticides were detected.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Chromatography Aen_US
dc.sourceJournal of Chromatography A [ISSN 0021-9673],v. 1756 (Mayo 2025)en_US
dc.subject3214 Toxicologíaen_US
dc.subject.otherSeguridad alimentariaen_US
dc.titleOptimization and validation of a QuEChERS-based method with a freezing-out clean-up for pesticide residues in commercial dry food for dogs and catsen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.chroma.2025.466093en_US
dc.identifier.scopus105006779754-
dc.identifier.isi001501780000003-
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-8554-5728-
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-4153-3028-
dc.contributor.orcidNO DATA-
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-1272-0545-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid57211938605-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid6507534124-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid6603336485-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid56096659300-
dc.identifier.eissn1873-3778-
dc.relation.volume1756en_US
dc.investigacionCiencias de la Saluden_US
dc.type2Artículoen_US
dc.contributor.daisngid29781905-
dc.contributor.daisngid657356-
dc.contributor.daisngid76306758-
dc.contributor.daisngid1500281-
dc.description.numberofpages24en_US
dc.utils.revisionen_US
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Macias-Montes, A-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Luzardo, OP-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Zaccaroni, A-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Acosta-Dacal, A-
dc.date.coverdateMayo 2025en_US
dc.identifier.ulpgcen_US
dc.contributor.buulpgcBU-VETen_US
dc.description.sjr0,717-
dc.description.jcr3,8-
dc.description.sjrqQ2-
dc.description.jcrqQ1-
dc.description.scieSCIE-
dc.description.miaricds11,0-
item.fulltextCon texto completo-
item.grantfulltextopen-
crisitem.author.deptGIR IUIBS: Medio Ambiente y Salud-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Investigaciones Biomédicas y Sanitarias-
crisitem.author.deptGIR IUIBS: Medio Ambiente y Salud-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Investigaciones Biomédicas y Sanitarias-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Ciencias Clínicas-
crisitem.author.deptGIR IUIBS: Medio Ambiente y Salud-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Investigaciones Biomédicas y Sanitarias-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-8554-5728-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-4153-3028-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-1272-0545-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Investigaciones Biomédicas y Sanitarias-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Investigaciones Biomédicas y Sanitarias-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Investigaciones Biomédicas y Sanitarias-
crisitem.author.fullNameMacías Montes, Ana-
crisitem.author.fullNamePérez Luzardo, Octavio Luis-
crisitem.author.fullNameAcosta Dacal, Andrea Carolina-
Appears in Collections:Artículos
Adobe PDF (5,26 MB)
Show simple item record

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

1
checked on Jan 12, 2026

Page view(s)

3
checked on Jan 10, 2026

Download(s)

20
checked on Jan 10, 2026

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Share



Export metadata



Items in accedaCRIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.