Identificador persistente para citar o vincular este elemento:
https://accedacris.ulpgc.es/handle/10553/138994
Título: | A gendered analysis of interpersonal grammatical metaphor in historical medical writing | Autores/as: | Alonso Almeida, Francisco Jesús Álvarez Gil, Francisco J. |
Clasificación UNESCO: | 57 Lingüística 5702 Lingüística diacrónica |
Palabras clave: | Interpersonal grammatical metaphor Medical discourse Gender Historical linguistics Corpus analysis, et al. |
Fecha de publicación: | 2025 | Proyectos: | Los Mecanismos Interpersonales en Los Textos Instructivos Especializados, Domésticosy No Domésticos, Escritos Por Mujeres en Inglés Moderno | Conferencia: | Semmelweis medical linguistics conference 2025. Inclusivity and diversity in healthcare communication research | Resumen: | Medical technical discourse has long been a site of negotiation between authoritative knowledge and patient engagement, with interpersonal grammatical metaphor (IGM) playing a key role in shaping communicative strategies (Halliday & Matthiessen, 2014). Although considerable study has investigated grammatical metaphor in scientific literature, limited studies have addressed its interpersonal uses in historical medical discourse (Taavitsainen & Pahta, 2011), especially from a gendered viewpoint. This study fills this gap by examining IGM in 18th- and 19th-century medical texts inside the Corpus of Women's Instructive Texts in English (CoWITE) and a corresponding comparable compilation of male-authored medical texts, used as a reference corpus. This study used Systemic Functional Linguistics as an analytical framework to examine how male and female authors employed IGM to establish authority and convey modality in technical specialised texts in written interaction (Martin & White, 2005). The analysis is expected to reveal significant gender differences: female-authored texts use more metaphorical realisations of obligation and possibility (e.g., "it is necessary to consider" vs. "one must consider"), implying a greater emphasis on involvement and indirect persuasion (Wodak, 1997) to avoid potential criticism in a male-dominated discipline. Male-authored texts, on the other hand, tend to favour less hedged statements, maintaining the disparity in medical authority. The findings seek to add to our knowledge of interpersonal positioning in historical medical discourse by indicating that gender influenced the linguistic strategies used to engage with patients and fellow practitioners. This study has implications for both historical sociolinguistics and the evolution of professional medical communication and wants to demonstrate the long-term impact of gendered discourse patterns on medical authority and reader- and user-centered discourse. | URI: | https://accedacris.ulpgc.es/handle/10553/138994 | Fuente: | Semmelweis medical linguistics conference 2025. Book of Abstracts. Inclusivity and diversity in healthcare communication research. 23-24 May 2025. Budapest |
Colección: | Actas de congresos |
Los elementos en ULPGC accedaCRIS están protegidos por derechos de autor con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.