Identificador persistente para citar o vincular este elemento: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/135108
Campo DC Valoridioma
dc.contributor.authorDiaz-Diaz, Nieves Lidia-
dc.contributor.authorGarcia-Teruel, Pedro J.-
dc.contributor.authorMartinez-Solano, Pedro-
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-20T09:17:53Z-
dc.date.available2024-12-20T09:17:53Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.issn1863-6683-
dc.identifier.otherWoS-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10553/135108-
dc.description.abstractThis paper analyses whether trade credit strategies depend on the family identity of the controlling shareholder. We use a sample of 4,022 private Spanish firms for the years 2004 and 2013 and examine family firm heterogeneity by analysing different thresholds of control, involvement in management and firm identification with the family name. The results reveal that family firms have more restrictive trade credit strategies than non-family firms. Moreover, among family-controlled firms, those with the strongest identification between the family shareholders and their firms are the most restrictive. However, family-controlled firms reduced trade credit less after the financial crisis of 2008. These firms supported their customers by limiting the impact of liquidity shocks during the crisis.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofReview of Managerial Science-
dc.sourceReview Of Managerial Science[ISSN 1863-6683], (2024)-
dc.subject530301 Contabilidad financiera-
dc.subject.otherProduct Market Power-
dc.subject.otherSocioemotional Wealth-
dc.subject.otherFirm Performance-
dc.subject.otherMonetary-Policy-
dc.subject.otherAsymmetric Information-
dc.subject.otherLarge Shareholders-
dc.subject.otherCapital Structure-
dc.subject.otherOwnership-
dc.subject.otherReputation-
dc.subject.otherModel-
dc.subject.otherFamily Firms-
dc.subject.otherHeterogeneity-
dc.subject.otherCustomers-
dc.subject.otherTrade Credit Granted-
dc.subject.otherControlling Shareholders-
dc.titleTrade credit and family control-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/Article-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11846-024-00821-6-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85208786602-
dc.identifier.isi001350162700002-
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-8752-6157-
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-7399-0111-
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-0509-5251-
dc.identifier.eissn1863-6691-
dc.investigacionCiencias Sociales y Jurídicas-
dc.type2Artículo-
dc.contributor.daisngidNo ID-
dc.contributor.daisngidNo ID-
dc.contributor.daisngidNo ID-
dc.description.numberofpages40-
dc.utils.revision-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Díaz-Díaz, NL-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:García-Teruel, PJ-
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Martínez-Solano, P-
dc.date.coverdate2024-
dc.identifier.ulpgc-
dc.contributor.buulpgcBU-ECO-
dc.description.sjr1,866-
dc.description.jcr7,8-
dc.description.sjrqQ1-
dc.description.jcrqQ1-
dc.description.ssciSSCI-
dc.description.miaricds10,6-
item.fulltextCon texto completo-
item.grantfulltextopen-
Colección:Artículos
Adobe PDF (2,7 MB)
Vista resumida

Google ScholarTM

Verifica

Altmetric


Comparte



Exporta metadatos



Los elementos en ULPGC accedaCRIS están protegidos por derechos de autor con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.