Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/132852
Title: Immune checkpoint blockers in solid organ transplant recipients and cancer: the INNOVATED cohort
Authors: Remon, J.
Auclin, E.
Zubiri, L.
Schneider, S.
Rodríguez Abreu, Delvys 
Minatta, N.
Gautschi, O.
Aboubakar, F.
Munoz-Couselo, E.
Pierret, T.
Rothschild, S. I.
Cortiula, F.
Reynolds, K. L.
Thibault, C.
Gavralidis, A.
Blais, N.
Barlesi, F.
Planchard, D.
Besse, B. M. D.
UNESCO Clasification: 32 Ciencias médicas
320713 Oncología
Keywords: Docetaxel
Outcomes
Risk
Solid-Organ Transplant
Cancer, et al
Issue Date: 2024
Journal: ESMO Open 
Abstract: Background: Patients with solid organ transplant (SOT) and solid tumors are usually excluded from clinical trials testing immune checkpoint blockers (ICB). As transplant rates are increasing, we aimed to evaluate ICB outcomes in this population, with a special focus on lung cancer. Methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study collecting real data of ICB use in patients with SOT and solid tumors. Clinical data and treatment outcomes were assessed by using retrospective medical chart reviews in every participating center. Study endpoints were: overall response rate (ORR), 6-month progression-free survival (PFS), and grade >= 3 immune-related adverse events. Results: From August 2016 to October 2022, 31 patients with SOT (98% kidney) and solid tumors were identified (36.0% lung cancer, 19.4% melanoma, 13.0% genitourinary cancer, 6.5% gastrointestinal cancer). Programmed death-ligand 1 expression was positive in 29% of tumors. Median age was 61 years, 69% were males, and 71% received ICB as first-line treatment. In the whole cohort the ORR was 45.2%, with a 6-month PFS of 56.8%. In the lung cancer cohort, the ORR was 45.5%, with a 6-month PFS of 32.7%, and median overall survival of 4.6 months. The grade 3 immune-related adverse events rate leading to ICB discontinuation was 12.9%. Allograft rejection rate was 25.8%, and risk of rejection was similar regardless of the type of ICB strategy (monotherapy or combination, 28% versus 33%, P = 1.0) or response to ICB treatment. Conclusions: ICB could be considered a feasible option for SOT recipients with some advanced solid malignancies and no alternative therapeutic options. Due to the risk of allograft rejection, multidisciplinary teams should be involved before ICB therapy.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/132852
ISSN: 2059-7029
DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.103004
Source: Esmo Open [eISSN 2059-7029] ,v. 9 (5), (Mayo 2024)
Appears in Collections:Artículos
Adobe PDF (391,75 kB)
Show full item record

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

1
checked on Feb 23, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Share



Export metadata



Items in accedaCRIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.