Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10553/130699
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Arakcheeva El Kori, Nenna | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Blanco Marigorta, Ana María | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Melián Martel, Noemí | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-05-28T12:17:33Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-05-28T12:17:33Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2024 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 2073-4441 | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | WoS | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10553/130699 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Increasing attention is being given to reduce the specific energy consumption in desalination processes, which translates into greater use of exergy analysis. An exergetic analysis provides relevant information related to the influence of the efficiency of a single component in the global plant performance and in the exergy cost of the product. Therefore, an exergy analysis identifies the main improvement potentials in a productive thermodynamic process. Related to desalination technologies, many previous papers deal with the calculation of the parameters involved in the exergy analysis, the exergetic efficiency of different processes, plants, and technologies among them. However, different approaches for formulating the exergetic efficiency have been suggested in the literature, often without sufficient understanding and consistency. In this work, these formulations, applied to the main desalination components and processes, are compared and critically reviewed. Two definitions of exergy efficiency are applied to the desalination components of the three main thermal desalination processes (multieffect distillation-thermal vapour compression, multistage flash distillation, and direct-contact membrane distillation). The results obtained for the exergy efficiency of the MED-TVC, MSF, and DCMD processes for the input-output approach are 21.35%, 17.08%, and 1.28%, respectively, compared to the consumed-produced approach that presented 3.1%, 1.58%, and 0.37%, respectively. The consumed-produced approach seems to better fit the thermodynamic behaviour of thermal desalination systems. | en_US |
dc.language | eng | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Water (Switzerland) | en_US |
dc.source | Water [EISSN 2073-4441], v. 16 (9), (Mayo 2024) | en_US |
dc.subject | 3303 ingeniería y tecnología químicas | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Brackish-Water Desalination | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Membrane Distillation | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Waste Heat | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Thermoeconomic Analysis | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Seawater Desalination | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Power-Generation | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Msf Desalination | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Energy | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Plant | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Solar | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Thermal Desalination | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Water-Energy Nexus | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Exergy Efficiency | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Exergy | en_US |
dc.title | Definition of Exergetic Efficiency in the Main and Emerging Thermal Desalination Technologies: A Proposal | en_US |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/Article | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.3390/w16091254 | en_US |
dc.identifier.isi | 001220017100001 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 2073-4441 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 9 | - |
dc.relation.volume | 16 | en_US |
dc.investigacion | Ingeniería y Arquitectura | en_US |
dc.type2 | Artículo | en_US |
dc.contributor.daisngid | No ID | - |
dc.contributor.daisngid | No ID | - |
dc.contributor.daisngid | No ID | - |
dc.description.numberofpages | 19 | en_US |
dc.utils.revision | Sí | en_US |
dc.contributor.wosstandard | WOS:El Kori, NA | - |
dc.contributor.wosstandard | WOS:Blanco-Marigorta, AM | - |
dc.contributor.wosstandard | WOS:Martel, NM | - |
dc.date.coverdate | Mayo 2024 | en_US |
dc.identifier.ulpgc | Sí | en_US |
dc.contributor.buulpgc | BU-ING | en_US |
dc.description.sjr | 0,724 | |
dc.description.jcr | 3,4 | |
dc.description.sjrq | Q1 | |
dc.description.jcrq | Q2 | |
dc.description.scie | SCIE | |
dc.description.miaricds | 10,6 | |
item.grantfulltext | open | - |
item.fulltext | Con texto completo | - |
crisitem.author.dept | GIR Group for the Research on Renewable Energy Systems | - |
crisitem.author.dept | GIR Group for the Research on Renewable Energy Systems | - |
crisitem.author.dept | Departamento de Ingeniería de Procesos | - |
crisitem.author.dept | GIR Group for the Research on Renewable Energy Systems | - |
crisitem.author.dept | Departamento de Ingeniería de Procesos | - |
crisitem.author.orcid | 0000-0003-4635-7235 | - |
crisitem.author.orcid | 0000-0001-5271-1443 | - |
crisitem.author.parentorg | Departamento de Ingeniería Mecánica | - |
crisitem.author.parentorg | Departamento de Ingeniería Mecánica | - |
crisitem.author.parentorg | Departamento de Ingeniería Mecánica | - |
crisitem.author.fullName | Arakcheeva El Kori, Nenna | - |
crisitem.author.fullName | Blanco Marigorta, Ana María | - |
crisitem.author.fullName | Melián Martel, Noemí | - |
Appears in Collections: | Artículos |
Page view(s)
92
checked on Nov 9, 2024
Download(s)
38
checked on Nov 9, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Share
Export metadata
Items in accedaCRIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.