Identificador persistente para citar o vincular este elemento: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/126926
Campo DC Valoridioma
dc.contributor.authorMartínez Alarcón, Lauraen_US
dc.contributor.authorFlores Medina, Juanen_US
dc.contributor.authorRamis, Guillermoen_US
dc.contributor.authorGómez Laguna, Jaimeen_US
dc.contributor.authorMoll, Xavieren_US
dc.contributor.authorFalceto, Victoriaen_US
dc.contributor.authorSan Román Ascaso, Fidelen_US
dc.contributor.authorSan Román Llorens, Fidelen_US
dc.contributor.authorQuereda, Juan Joséen_US
dc.contributor.authorHerrero, Juan Manuelen_US
dc.contributor.authorMendonça, Liviaen_US
dc.contributor.authorMartín Barrasa, José Luisen_US
dc.contributor.authorFernández, Olga Maríaen_US
dc.contributor.authorMuñoz, Antonioen_US
dc.contributor.authorRamirez, Pabloen_US
dc.contributor.authorGutiérrez, Pedroen_US
dc.contributor.authorLópez Chicheri, Isabelen_US
dc.contributor.authorLópez Navas, Anaen_US
dc.contributor.authorRíos, Antonioen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-25T07:30:54Z-
dc.date.available2023-09-25T07:30:54Z-
dc.date.issued2023en_US
dc.identifier.issn0908-665Xen_US
dc.identifier.otherScopus-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10553/126926-
dc.description.abstractBackground: The shortage of available transplant organs has made it necessary to search for alternatives, one of which is xenotransplantation. However, the use of animal organs could face rejection from society and the personnel involved in its implementation. Objectives: (a) to analyze the attitudes of Veterinary Degree students in six Spanish Universities towards xenotransplantation; and (b) to determine the factors that affect its acceptance. Methods: Of the 2815 students surveyed in the degree program, 2683 valid surveys were obtained. Attitudes towards organ xenotransplantation were evaluated using a validated questionnaire of organ donation. Results: If xenotransplantation was confirmed as a clinical reality, 93% (n = 2493) of those surveyed would accept a xenotransplanted organ, whilst 7% would not. If the results of xenotransplantation were worse than those obtained with human donors and it entailed more risk, 12% (n = 318) would be in favor. 56% (n = 1497) of the students would accept a xenotransplantation provisionally pending the arrival of a human organ. Attitudes towards xenotransplantation were affected by the academic year in which a student was studying, with more favorable attitudes among students in the last year (88% in first year vs. 95% in fifth year; p <.001). More favorable attitudes are also observed depending on the attitude they have towards organ transplantation, with those students being more in favor of donating their organs when they die (94% vs. 88%; p <.001). Conclusion: Veterinary students would have a very favorable attitude toward xenotransplantation if these animal organs functioned as well as human organs. Therefore, these students could play an important role in the future promotion of this technique.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofXenotransplantationen_US
dc.sourceXenotransplantation[ISSN 0908-665X], (Enero 2023)en_US
dc.subject310904 Medicina internaen_US
dc.subject.otherAttitudesen_US
dc.subject.otherDonationen_US
dc.subject.otherStudenten_US
dc.subject.otherVeterinaryen_US
dc.subject.otherXenotransplantationen_US
dc.titleOrgan xenotransplantation acceptance in veterinary students: A multicentric opinion study in Spainen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/xen.12823en_US
dc.identifier.scopus85170687620-
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-7497-6709-
dc.contributor.orcidNO DATA-
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-5580-1612-
dc.contributor.orcidNO DATA-
dc.contributor.orcidNO DATA-
dc.contributor.orcidNO DATA-
dc.contributor.orcidNO DATA-
dc.contributor.orcidNO DATA-
dc.contributor.orcidNO DATA-
dc.contributor.orcidNO DATA-
dc.contributor.orcidNO DATA-
dc.contributor.orcidNO DATA-
dc.contributor.orcidNO DATA-
dc.contributor.orcidNO DATA-
dc.contributor.orcidNO DATA-
dc.contributor.orcidNO DATA-
dc.contributor.orcidNO DATA-
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-1639-545X-
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-5512-9010-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid16310027300-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid57201274287-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid19235779700-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid12780391800-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid56377531800-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid57195732999-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid57190062932-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid56819007400-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid35079290800-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid57197694966-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid36911494200-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid6506508811-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid10439036700-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid57153484000-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid7103197251-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid6508342928-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid15846002900-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid12752418700-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid57190002254-
dc.identifier.eissn1399-3089-
dc.investigacionCiencias de la Saluden_US
dc.type2Artículoen_US
dc.utils.revisionen_US
dc.date.coverdateEnero 2023en_US
dc.identifier.ulpgcen_US
dc.contributor.buulpgcBU-VETen_US
dc.description.sjr0,982
dc.description.jcr3,9
dc.description.sjrqQ1
dc.description.jcrqQ2
dc.description.scieSCIE
dc.description.miaricds10,9
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextSin texto completo-
crisitem.author.deptGIR IUSA-ONE HEALTH 2 - Sanidad Animal de la Acuicultura y Especies Silvestres, Enfermedades Infecciosas y Seguridad Alimentaria-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Sanidad Animal y Seguridad Alimentaria-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Patología Animal, Producción Animal, Bromatología y Tecnología de Los Alimentos-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-3280-9838-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Sanidad Animal y Seguridad Alimentaria-
crisitem.author.fullNameMartín Barrasa, José Luis-
Colección:Artículos
Vista resumida

Google ScholarTM

Verifica

Altmetric


Comparte



Exporta metadatos



Los elementos en ULPGC accedaCRIS están protegidos por derechos de autor con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.