Identificador persistente para citar o vincular este elemento: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/124480
Campo DC Valoridioma
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez Suárez, Claudio Albertoen_US
dc.contributor.authorGonzález De La Torre, Héctoren_US
dc.contributor.authorHernández-De Luis, María Nairaen_US
dc.contributor.authorFernández-Gutiérrez, Domingo Ángelen_US
dc.contributor.authorMartínez-Alberto, Carlos Enriqueen_US
dc.contributor.authorBrito-Brito, Pedro Ruymánen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-18T14:38:26Z-
dc.date.available2023-09-18T14:38:26Z-
dc.date.issued2023en_US
dc.identifier.issn2227-9032en_US
dc.identifier.otherScopus-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10553/124480-
dc.description.abstractThe decision-making in clinical nursing, regarding diagnoses, interventions and outcomes, can be assessed using standardized language systems such as NANDA International, the Nursing Interventions Classification and the Nursing Outcome Classification; these taxonomies are the most commonly used by nurses in informatized clinical records. The purpose of this review is to synthesize the evidence on the effectiveness of the nursing process with standardized terminology using the NANDA International, the Nursing Interventions Classification and the Nursing Outcome Classification in care practice to assess the association between the presence of the related/risk factors and the clinical decision-making about nursing diagnosis, assessing the effectiveness of nursing interventions and health outcomes, and increasing people’s satisfaction. A systematic review was carried out in Medline and PreMedline (OvidSP), Embase (Embase-Elsevier), The Cochrane Library (Wiley), CINAHL (EbscoHOST), SCI-EXPANDED, SSCI and Scielo (WOS), LILACS (Health Virtual Library) and SCOPUS (SCOPUS-Elsevier) and included randomized clinical trials as well as quasi-experimental, cohort and case-control studies. Selection and critical appraisal were conducted by two independent reviewers. The certainty of the evidence was assessed with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation Methodology. A total of 17 studies were included with variability in the level and certainty of evidence. According to the outcomes, 6 studies assessed diagnostic decision-making and 11 assessed improvements in individual health outcomes. No studies assessed improvements in intervention effectiveness or population satisfaction. There is a need to increase studies with rigorous methodologies that address clinical decision-making about nursing diagnoses using NANDA International and individuals’ health outcomes using the Nursing Interventions Classification and the Nursing Outcome Classification as well as implementing studies that assess the use of these terminologies for improvements in the effectiveness of nurses’ interventions and population satisfaction with the nursing process.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofHealthcareen_US
dc.sourceHealthcare (Switzerland)[EISSN 2227-9032],v. 11 (17):2449, (Septiembre 2023)en_US
dc.subject32 Ciencias médicasen_US
dc.subject3201 Ciencias clínicasen_US
dc.subject.otherEffectivenessen_US
dc.subject.otherNursing careen_US
dc.subject.otherNursing processen_US
dc.subject.otherStandardized nursing terminologyen_US
dc.subject.otherSystematic reviewen_US
dc.titleEffectiveness of a Standardized Nursing Process Using NANDA International, Nursing Interventions Classification and Nursing Outcome Classification Terminologies: A Systematic Reviewen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/healthcare11172449en_US
dc.identifier.scopus85170398945-
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-6226-7374-
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-1774-4260-
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-9720-3661-
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-9151-6579-
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-0252-5308-
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-8048-9701-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid57213145259-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid36835723800-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid57575765200-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid55983410600-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid57200144613-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid55207317100-
dc.identifier.eissn2227-9032-
dc.identifier.issue17-
dc.relation.volume11en_US
dc.investigacionCiencias de la Saluden_US
dc.type2Artículoen_US
dc.description.numberofpages19en_US
dc.utils.revisionen_US
dc.date.coverdateSeptiembre 2023en_US
dc.identifier.ulpgcen_US
dc.contributor.buulpgcBU-MEDen_US
dc.description.sjr0,606
dc.description.jcr2,8
dc.description.sjrqQ2
dc.description.jcrqQ2
dc.description.esciESCI
dc.description.miaricds8,4
item.fulltextCon texto completo-
item.grantfulltextopen-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Enfermería-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Enfermería-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-6226-7374-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-1774-4260-
crisitem.author.fullNameRodríguez Suárez, Claudio Alberto-
crisitem.author.fullNameGonzález De La Torre, Héctor-
Colección:Artículos
Adobe PDF (709,24 kB)
Vista resumida

Visitas

19
actualizado el 23-sep-2024

Google ScholarTM

Verifica

Altmetric


Comparte



Exporta metadatos



Los elementos en ULPGC accedaCRIS están protegidos por derechos de autor con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.