Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/123486
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAlexandr Torresen_US
dc.contributor.authorHernández Castellano, Lorenzo Enriqueen_US
dc.contributor.authorMorales De La Nuez, Antonio Joséen_US
dc.contributor.authorCastro Navarro, Noemíen_US
dc.contributor.authorArgüello Henríquez, Anastasioen_US
dc.contributor.authorSánchez Macías,Daviniaen_US
dc.contributor.authorCapote Álvarez, Juan Franciscoen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-13T12:18:00Z-
dc.date.available2023-06-13T12:18:00Z-
dc.date.issued2010en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10553/123486-
dc.description.abstract30 dairy goats of three Canary breeds (Majorera, Tinerfeña and Palmera) in middle lactation period were milked to evaluate udder compartments (cisternal and alveolar), milk yield and milk composition of each milk fraction. Left mammary gland were milked once daily (X1) and right mammary gland twice daily (X2) at 10 and 14 hours intervals during 3 weeks. Before milking goats an intravenous injection of an inhibitor of oxytocin (Atosiban®) was administered to evaluate the cisternal milk yield. After cisternal milk removal, goats were intravenously injected with 2 IU of oxytocin, and then milked again in order to collect the milk contained in the alveoli. No significant differences were found in the percentage of cisternal and alveolar milk on total milk produced in X1 and X2. Nevertheless, the Majorera breed had higher average yields of cisternal milk (54.79 ml/h and 58.57 ml/h for X1 and X2, respectively), than Tinerfeña breed (50.63 ml/h and 57.88 ml/h for X1 and X2, respectively) and Palmera breed (42.22 ml/h and 52.73 ml/h for X1 and X2, respectively), and consequently those goats had a 13.55% and 20.58% more cisternal area than Tinerfeña and Palmera breed, respectively. Cisternal milk of X1 goats contained similar percentages of fat (3.70 vs 3.65%), protein (3.65% vs 3.56%), lactose (4.83% vs 4.85%), total solids (12.90% vs 12.76%) and solids non fat (9.19% vs 9.10%) than cisternal milk of X2 goats. However, alveolar milk of X1 goats contained higher percentages of fat (6.31% vs 5.43%) and total solids (15.27% vs 14.42%) than alveolar milk of X2 goats. Although, there were breed by frequency interactions in the cisternal milk yields (P= 0.032), no interactions for the parameters of cisternal milk composition were found. In the alveolar milk, breed by frequency interactions were not found in the milk yield (P= 0.793) and milk composition. In sum, the milking frequency did not affect the percentage of cisternal and alveolar milk in Canary breed goats. Furthermore, the milking frequency has not negative effects on composition of cisternal and alveolar milk.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherInternational Goat Associationen_US
dc.source10th International Conference on Goatsen_US
dc.subject3104 Producción Animalen_US
dc.titleEffect of milking frequency and genotype on milk partitioning and milk qualityen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/lectureen_US
dc.typeLectureen_US
dc.relation.conference10th International Conference on Goats - Technological Development and Associate Attempts to a Sustainable Small Livestock Activityen_US
dc.description.lastpage64en_US
dc.description.firstpage63en_US
dc.investigacionCiencias de la Saluden_US
dc.type2Ponenciaen_US
dc.description.numberofpages2en_US
dc.utils.revisionen_US
dc.date.coverdateSeptiembre 2010en_US
dc.identifier.ulpgcen_US
dc.contributor.buulpgcBU-VETen_US
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextCon texto completo-
crisitem.event.eventsstartdate19-09-2010-
crisitem.event.eventsenddate23-09-2010-
crisitem.author.deptGIR IUSA-ONEHEALTH 4. Producción y Biotecnología Animal-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Sanidad Animal y Seguridad Alimentaria-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Patología Animal, Producción Animal, Bromatología y Tecnología de Los Alimentos-
crisitem.author.deptGIR IUSA-ONEHEALTH 4. Producción y Biotecnología Animal-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Sanidad Animal y Seguridad Alimentaria-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Patología Animal, Producción Animal, Bromatología y Tecnología de Los Alimentos-
crisitem.author.deptGIR IUSA-ONEHEALTH 4. Producción y Biotecnología Animal-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Sanidad Animal y Seguridad Alimentaria-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Patología Animal, Producción Animal, Bromatología y Tecnología de Los Alimentos-
crisitem.author.deptGIR IUSA-ONEHEALTH 4. Producción y Biotecnología Animal-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Sanidad Animal y Seguridad Alimentaria-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Patología Animal, Producción Animal, Bromatología y Tecnología de Los Alimentos-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-2729-0434-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-0184-2037-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-3026-2031-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-4426-0678-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Sanidad Animal y Seguridad Alimentaria-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Sanidad Animal y Seguridad Alimentaria-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Sanidad Animal y Seguridad Alimentaria-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Sanidad Animal y Seguridad Alimentaria-
crisitem.author.fullNameHernández Castellano, Lorenzo Enrique-
crisitem.author.fullNameMorales De La Nuez, Antonio José-
crisitem.author.fullNameCastro Navarro, Noemí-
crisitem.author.fullNameArgüello Henríquez, Anastasio-
crisitem.author.fullNameSánchez Macías,Davinia-
crisitem.author.fullNameCapote Álvarez, Juan Francisco-
Appears in Collections:Ponencias
Adobe PDF (292,78 kB)
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

25
checked on Apr 13, 2024

Download(s)

15
checked on Apr 13, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Share



Export metadata



Items in accedaCRIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.