Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/123051
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMéndez Alonzo, Manuelen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-25T08:45:48Z-
dc.date.available2023-05-25T08:45:48Z-
dc.date.issued2017en_US
dc.identifier.issn1854-9632en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10553/123051-
dc.description.abstractIn this paper I present the theory of natural rights and liberty of Bartolome de Las Casas. I hold that the theoretical foundation of Las Casas is found in juridical texts, only complemented by Thomist authorities. I show that the apparent inconsistencies were a means to make his discourse more effective against those who defended the enslavement of Native Americans. Finally, this eclecticism enabled Las Casas to create an original theory of civil power and liberty by using Canon law texts and terms.en_US
dc.description.abstractV prispevku avtor predstavi teorijo o naravnih pravicah in svobodi Bartoloméja de las Casasa. Meni, da Las Casasove teoretske osnove najdemo v pravnih besedilih, ki jih je dopolnil le s tomističnimi viri. Avtor pokaže, da so Las Casasove navidezne nedoslednosti delovale kot sredstvo za povečevanje učinkovitosti diskurza proti tistim, ki so zagovarjali zasužnjevanje staroselcev. Eklekticizem pa je Las Casasu omogočil, da s posluževanjem besedil in terminov kanonskega prava oblikuje izvirno teorijo o civilni oblasti in svobodi.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofArs et Humanitasen_US
dc.sourceArs et Humanitas [ISSN 1854-9632], v. 11 (2), p. 281-292, (2017)en_US
dc.subject550404-1 Historia moderna. Área americanaen_US
dc.subject720704 Filosofía políticaen_US
dc.subject.otherLas Casasen_US
dc.subject.otherNative American rightsen_US
dc.subject.otherLibertyen_US
dc.subject.otherUniversal human rightsen_US
dc.subject.otherHatural lawen_US
dc.subject.otherPravice staroselceven_US
dc.subject.otherSvobodaen_US
dc.subject.otherSplošne človekove praviceen_US
dc.subject.otherNaravno pravoen_US
dc.titleBetween Thomism and Roman Civil Law: The Eclectic Concept of Liberty of Bartolome De Las Casas and his Theoretical Defence of Native Americans during the Sixteenth Centuryen_US
dc.title.alternativeMed tomizmom in rimskim civilnim pravom: eklektični koncept svobode Bartoloméja de las Casasa in njegov teoretski zagovor staroselcev v 16. stoletjuen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.4312/ars.11.2.281-292en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85042373031-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000419814600020-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.description.lastpage292en_US
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.description.firstpage281en_US
dc.relation.volume11en_US
dc.investigacionArtes y Humanidadesen_US
dc.type2Artículoen_US
dc.utils.revisionen_US
dc.identifier.ulpgcen_US
dc.contributor.buulpgcBU-HUMen_US
dc.description.esciESCI
dc.description.erihplusERIH PLUS
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextCon texto completo-
crisitem.author.deptGIR IATEXT: Documentación, Patrimonio e Historia Atlántica-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Análisis y Aplicaciones Textuales-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-8529-1542-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Análisis y Aplicaciones Textuales-
crisitem.author.fullNameMéndez Alonzo,Manuel-
Appears in Collections:Artículos
Adobe PDF (538,42 kB)
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

1
checked on Nov 24, 2024

Page view(s)

39
checked on Jun 8, 2024

Download(s)

14
checked on Jun 8, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Share



Export metadata



Items in accedaCRIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.