Identificador persistente para citar o vincular este elemento: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/122125
Campo DC Valoridioma
dc.contributor.authorCunill Saez, Annaen_US
dc.contributor.authorSantiago Díaz, Paulaen_US
dc.contributor.authorSamperio-Ramos, G.en_US
dc.contributor.authorRico Santos, Milagrosen_US
dc.contributor.authorRivero Rosales, Argimiroen_US
dc.contributor.authorSantana Casiano, Magdalenaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-27T09:45:52Z-
dc.date.available2023-04-27T09:45:52Z-
dc.date.issued2023en_US
dc.identifier.isbn978-84-9042-477-3en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10553/122125-
dc.description.abstractExtracellular phenolic compounds released by Emiliania huxleyi cultured under four different pH (8.25, 8.1; 7.9 and 7.75) were identified (Samperio-Ramos et al., 2017). Therefore, samples of seawater enriched with exudates (700 mL) were passed through cartridges Chromabon Easy (Macherey-Nagel, 500 mg). The retained analytes were eluted with MeOH (5 mL), which was evaporated to dryness, and dissolved in MeOH (300 μL) (Rico et al., 2013). Chromatographic analysis was performed with a Jasco LC-4000 HPLC, a Varian C18 column (250 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 μm), and eluents Milli-Q water with 0.1% formic acid (A) and methanol (B). The elution conditions were: 0–5 min, 80% A isocratic; 5–30 min, linear gradient from 80% to 40% A. Simultaneous monitoring for quantification was set at 270 nm (gallic acid, protocatechuic acid, catechin, vanillic acid, rutin, epicatechin, and syringic acid) and 324 nm (gentisic acid, coumaric acid, and ferulic acid) (Santiago-Díaz et al., 2021). Gallic, protocatechuic, vanillic and syringic acids were detected over the limits of quantification. Syringic acid was identified in all samples and vanillic acid was only detected in cells cultured at pH 8.25 and 8.1. Protocatechuic acid was the most abundant compound at pH 7.75 and 8.25 (6.75 and 4.65 μg mL-1 respectively), and syringic acid at pH 8.1 and 7.9 (2.08 and 1.85 μg mL-1 respectively). The total content of these four compounds was higher at pH 7.75, followed by pH 8.25, 8.1 and 7.9 (8.73, 8.09, 3.15 and 2.99 μg mL-1 respectively). The highest productivity per cell was attained at pH 7.75, followed by pH 8.25 (1.43×10-8 and 1.22×10-8 μg cell-1 respectively). The exudates reducing power, expressed as neutralization percentage of 1,1-diphenyl-2- picrylhydrazyl radical (Bondet et al., 1997), were 18.2, 18.7, 23.2, and 40.2% at pH 7.75, 8.25, 8.10, and 7.9 respectively. Acidification conditions affect the amount, composition and antioxidant activity of Emiliania huxleyi exudate.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherServicio de Publicaciones y Difusión Científica de la Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria (ULPGC)en_US
dc.relationEfecto de la Acidificacion Oceanica, la Temperaturay El Contenido de Materia Organica en la Persistencia de Fe(Ii) en El Oceano Atlanticoen_US
dc.sourceAbstracts Volume VIII International Symposium on Marine Sciences, July 2022 / coordinación, María Esther Torres Padrón, p. 347-348en_US
dc.subject251002 Oceanografía químicaen_US
dc.subject251001 Oceanografía biológicaen_US
dc.subject230305 Carbonoen_US
dc.subject.otherSeawateren_US
dc.subject.otherEmiliania huxleyi exudateen_US
dc.subject.otherPhenolic compoundsen_US
dc.subject.otherReducing poweren_US
dc.subject.otherSolid phase extractionen_US
dc.subject.otherHPLCen_US
dc.titleIdentification of phenolic compounds exuded by Emiliania huxleyi under acidification conditionsen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObjecten_US
dc.typeConference posteren_US
dc.relation.conferenceVIII International Symposium on Marine Sciences (ISMS 2022)en_US
dc.description.lastpage348en_US
dc.description.firstpage347en_US
dc.investigacionCienciasen_US
dc.type2Póster de congresosen_US
dc.description.numberofpages2en_US
dc.utils.revisionen_US
dc.date.coverdateJulio 2022en_US
dc.identifier.ulpgcen_US
dc.contributor.buulpgcBU-BASen_US
dc.contributor.buulpgcBU-BASen_US
dc.contributor.buulpgcBU-BASen_US
dc.contributor.buulpgcBU-BASen_US
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextCon texto completo-
crisitem.project.principalinvestigatorSantana Casiano, Juana Magdalena-
crisitem.author.deptGIR IOCAG: Química Marina-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Oceanografía y Cambio Global-
crisitem.author.deptGIR IOCAG: Química Marina-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Oceanografía y Cambio Global-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Química-
crisitem.author.deptGIR IOCAG: Química Marina-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Oceanografía y Cambio Global-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Química-
crisitem.author.deptGIR IOCAG: Química Marina-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Oceanografía y Cambio Global-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Química-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-4216-9720-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-2711-8952-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-0706-2434-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-7930-7683-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Oceanografía y Cambio Global-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Oceanografía y Cambio Global-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Oceanografía y Cambio Global-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Oceanografía y Cambio Global-
crisitem.author.fullNameSantiago Díaz, Paula-
crisitem.author.fullNameRico Santos, Milagros-
crisitem.author.fullNameRivero Rosales, Argimiro-
crisitem.author.fullNameSantana Casiano, Juana Magdalena-
crisitem.event.eventsstartdate06-07-2022-
crisitem.event.eventsenddate08-07-2022-
Colección:Póster de congreso
Adobe PDF (600,82 kB)
Vista resumida

Google ScholarTM

Verifica

Altmetric


Comparte



Exporta metadatos



Los elementos en ULPGC accedaCRIS están protegidos por derechos de autor con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.