Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/121465
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGoetze, Jordan Sen_US
dc.contributor.authorWilson, Shaunen_US
dc.contributor.authorRadford, Benen_US
dc.contributor.authorFisher, Rebeccaen_US
dc.contributor.authorLanglois, Tim J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMonk, Jacquomoen_US
dc.contributor.authorKnott, Nathan A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMalcolm, Hamishen_US
dc.contributor.authorCurrey-Randall, Leanne M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorIerodiaconou, Danielen_US
dc.contributor.authorHarasti, Daviden_US
dc.contributor.authorBarrett, Nevilleen_US
dc.contributor.authorBabcock, Russell C.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBosch Guerra, Néstor Echedeyen_US
dc.contributor.authorBrock, Dannyen_US
dc.contributor.authorClaudet, Joachimen_US
dc.contributor.authorClough, Jocken_US
dc.contributor.authorFairclough, David V.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHeupel, Michelle R.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHolmes, Thomas H.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHuveneers, Charlieen_US
dc.contributor.authorJordan, Alan Ren_US
dc.contributor.authorMcLean, Dianneen_US
dc.contributor.authorMeekan, Marken_US
dc.contributor.authorMiller, Daviden_US
dc.contributor.authorNewman, Stephen J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorRees, Matthew J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorRoberts, Kelsey E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSaunders, Benjamin J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSpeed, Conrad W.en_US
dc.contributor.authorTravers, Michael J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorTreml, Ericen_US
dc.contributor.authorWhitmarsh, Sasha K.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWakefield, Corey B.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHarvey, Euan S.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-22T09:35:44Z-
dc.date.available2023-03-22T09:35:44Z-
dc.date.issued2021en_US
dc.identifier.issn1354-1013en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10553/121465-
dc.description.abstractMarine reserves are a key tool for the conservation of marine biodiversity, yet only ~2.5% of the world's oceans are protected. The integration of marine reserves into connected networks representing all habitats has been encouraged by international agreements, yet the benefits of this design has not been tested empirically. Australia has one of the largest systems of marine reserves, providing a rare opportunity to assess how connectivity influences conservation success. An Australia-wide dataset was collected using baited remote underwater video systems deployed across a depth range from 0 to 100 m to assess the effectiveness of marine reserves for protecting teleosts subject to commercial and recreational fishing. A meta-analytical comparison of 73 fished species within 91 marine reserves found that, on average, marine reserves had 28% greater abundance and 53% greater biomass of fished species compared to adjacent areas open to fishing. However, benefits of protection were not observed across all reserves (heterogeneity), so full subsets generalized additive modelling was used to consider factors that influence marine reserve effectiveness, including distance-based and ecological metrics of connectivity among reserves. Our results suggest that increased connectivity and depth improve the aforementioned marine reserve benefits and that these factors should be considered to optimize such benefits over time. We provide important guidance on factors to consider when implementing marine reserves for the purpose of increasing the abundance and size of fished species, given the expected increase in coverage globally. We show that marine reserves that are highly protected (no-take) and designed to optimize connectivity, size and depth range can provide an effective conservation strategy for fished species in temperate and tropical waters within an overarching marine biodiversity conservation framework.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofGlobal Change Biologyen_US
dc.sourceGlobal Change Biology [ISSN 1354-1013], v. 27 (15), p. i-ii, 3395-3698, (Agosto 2021)en_US
dc.subject2510 Oceanografíaen_US
dc.subject590208 Política del medio ambienteen_US
dc.subject.otherFully protected areasen_US
dc.subject.otherMarine conservationen_US
dc.subject.otherMarine protected areasen_US
dc.subject.otherMarine reserve designen_US
dc.subject.otherMarine reserve effectivenessen_US
dc.subject.otherMeta-analysisen_US
dc.subject.otherSanctuariesen_US
dc.titleIncreased connectivity and depth improve the effectiveness of marine reservesen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/gcb.15635en_US
dc.identifier.pmid34015863-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85106259184-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000652323600001-
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-3090-9763-
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-4590-0948-
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-1715-9109-
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-5148-6731-
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-6404-4000-
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-1874-0619-
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-7873-0412-
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-7315-1537-
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-3772-1288-
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-7832-4801-
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-2851-9838-
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-6167-1356-
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-7756-1290-
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-0421-8456-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-6295-1061-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-9620-5064-
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-8245-7332-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-8937-1358-
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-1135-1618-
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-0306-8348-
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-3067-9427-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-5324-5568-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-8422-632X-
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-1929-518X-
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-3186-8710-
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-3072-1699-
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-4844-4420-
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-8934-2354-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-9069-4581-
dc.identifier.issue15-
dc.relation.volume27en_US
dc.investigacionCienciasen_US
dc.type2Artículoen_US
dc.utils.revisionen_US
dc.identifier.ulpgcNoen_US
dc.contributor.buulpgcBU-BASen_US
dc.description.sjr3,685
dc.description.jcr13,211
dc.description.sjrqQ1
dc.description.jcrqQ1
dc.description.scieSCIE
dc.description.miaricds10,9
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextSin texto completo-
crisitem.author.deptGIR ECOAQUA: Biodiversidad y Conservación-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Investigación en Acuicultura Sostenible y Ec-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-0421-8456-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Investigación en Acuicultura Sostenible y Ec-
crisitem.author.fullNameBosch Guerra, Néstor Echedey-
Appears in Collections:Artículos
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

33
checked on Nov 17, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

31
checked on Nov 17, 2024

Page view(s)

45
checked on Jun 16, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Share



Export metadata



Items in accedaCRIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.