Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10553/121284
Title: | Economic consequences of over-diagnosis of threatened preterm labor | Authors: | Coloma, Marta Kang, Fátima Vallejo Torres, Laura Díaz, Paloma Méndez, Yurena Álvarez de la Rosa, Margarita |
UNESCO Clasification: | 32 Ciencias médicas 320108 Ginecología |
Keywords: | Cervical length measurement Healthcare costs Length of stay Prematurity Sick leave, et al |
Issue Date: | 2018 | Journal: | International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Abstract: | Objective: To investigate whether adherence to a cervical length-based protocol can reduce both unnecessary admissions and the socioeconomic costs associated with inappropriately admitted patients. Methods: The present retrospective observational study included women admitted for threatened preterm labor (TPL) at 24–34 weeks of pregnancy to a tertiary hospital in the Canary Islands, 2009–2014. Data were reviewed from all patients admitted for TPL. Those with a long cervix (>25 mm) were classified as “inappropriate admissions”, and both the economic burden based on diagnosis-related group (DRG) and the social costs associated with sick leave for these women were calculated. Results: During the 6-year study period, 430 women were admitted for TPL. The rate of inappropriate hospital admissions was 45% in the first year, but was reduced to 23% in the final year (P<0.001); the premature delivery rates in these years did not differ (P=0.224). The mean DRG-based cost of the admission per patient with a long cervix was EU euros €2099. The total annual costs from inappropriate admission (both social security sick leave costs and hospital costs) were estimated to be up to €571 047.37 during the 6-year study period, and reduced from €60 420.76 in 2009 to €29 998.04 in 2014. Conclusion: Reductions in inappropriate admissions from applying cervical length-based management protocol could reduce healthcare costs without increasing the incidence of premature delivery. | URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10553/121284 | ISSN: | 0020-7292 | DOI: | 10.1002/ijgo.12450 | Source: | International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics [ISSN 0020-7292], v. 141 (2), p. 200-205 |
Appears in Collections: | Artículos |
Items in accedaCRIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.