Identificador persistente para citar o vincular este elemento: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/115227
Campo DC Valoridioma
dc.contributor.authorÁlvarez Gil, Francisco Joséen_US
dc.contributor.authorDomínguez Morales, María Elenaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-16T14:19:46Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-16T14:19:46Z-
dc.date.issued2020en_US
dc.identifier.isbn978-80-89864-21-8en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10553/115227-
dc.description.abstractThis presentation explores the categories of evidentiality, i.e. the mode of knowing, and epistemic modality, i.e. judgements about certainty, in a corpus of English and Spanish abstracts in the field of medicine written in the last decades by native speakers of these languages. Our notion of abstracts follows the description of the genre provided Bondi and Lorés-Sanz (2014). The analyses of epistemic modality and evidentiality are based on the works of Plungian (2001), Marín-Arrese (2009), and Cornillie (2009), Alonso-Almeida (2015a), among others, and these allow us to establish a differentiation between evidential and epistemic legitimating strategies. For this, lexical and grammatica units will be considered in our analysis of research article abstracts. In doing this, we seek to explore and describe the functions of evidential and epistemic devices in the scientific domain in two different languages. This study has, therefore, two main objectives: (a) to identify and categorize evidential and epistemic markers in our corpus of English and Spanish medical abstracts, (b) to describe the functions these strategies fulfil in the abstracts, and (b) to see whether these strategies are register-dependent, i.e. whether there are differences according to the language used. In the light of earlier evidence on research articles from a contrastive perspective (AlonsoAlmeida 2015b; Almeida & Pastor 2017), we expect abstract to show more cases of epistemic modality in the case of the English texts, as English texts have been shown to rely on this type of modality in order to convey politeness within the community of scientists for which these abstracts are aimed at (Carrió-Pastor & Calderón 2015).en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.sourceBook of abstracts LLCE 2020, 10-12 december, Rome / Silvia Pokrivcakova (ed.), p. 10en_US
dc.subject5701 Lingüística aplicadaen_US
dc.subject5705 Lingüística sincrónicaen_US
dc.titleEpistemic and evidential legitimization strategies in English and Spanish medical research article abstractsen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceobjecten_US
dc.typeConferenceObjecten_US
dc.relation.conference6th International Conference on Language, Literature and Culture in Education (LLCE 2020)en_US
dc.investigacionArtes y Humanidadesen_US
dc.type2Actas de congresosen_US
dc.utils.revisionen_US
dc.identifier.ulpgcen_US
dc.contributor.buulpgcBU-HUMen_US
item.fulltextCon texto completo-
item.grantfulltextopen-
crisitem.author.deptGIR Discourse, Communication and Society-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Filología Moderna, Traducción e Interpretación-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-8752-9091-
crisitem.author.parentorgDepartamento de Filología Moderna, Traducción e Interpretación-
crisitem.author.fullNameÁlvarez Gil, Francisco José-
crisitem.event.eventsstartdate10-12-2020-
crisitem.event.eventsenddate12-12-2020-
Colección:Actas de congresos
Adobe PDF (854,54 kB)
Vista resumida

Google ScholarTM

Verifica

Altmetric


Comparte



Exporta metadatos



Los elementos en ULPGC accedaCRIS están protegidos por derechos de autor con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.