Identificador persistente para citar o vincular este elemento: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/114516
Campo DC Valoridioma
dc.contributor.authorGarcía-Pérez, Lidiaen_US
dc.contributor.authorRamallo Fariña, Yolandaen_US
dc.contributor.authorVallejo Torres, Lauraen_US
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez Rodríguez, Leticiaen_US
dc.contributor.authorGonzález Pacheco, Himaren_US
dc.contributor.authorSantos Hernández, Beatrizen_US
dc.contributor.authorGarcía Bello, Miguel Angelen_US
dc.contributor.authorWägner, Anna Maria Claudiaen_US
dc.contributor.authorCarmona, Montserraten_US
dc.contributor.authorSerrano Aguilar, Pedro G.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-29T09:47:41Z-
dc.date.available2022-04-29T09:47:41Z-
dc.date.issued2022en_US
dc.identifier.issn2044-6055en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10553/114516-
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: To analyse the cost-effectiveness of multicomponent interventions designed to improve outcomes in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in primary care in the Canary Islands, Spain, within the INDICA randomised clinical trial, from the public health system perspective. DESIGN: An economic evaluation was conducted for the within-trial period (2 years) comparing the four arms of the INDICA study. SETTING: Primary care in the Canary Islands, Spain. PARTICIPANTS: 2334 patients with T2DM without complications were included. INTERVENTIONS: Interventions for patients (PTI), for primary care professionals (PFI), for both (combined intervention arm for patients and professionals, CBI) and usual care (UC) as a control group. OUTCOMES: The main outcome was the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-years (QALY). Only the intervention and the healthcare costs were included. ANALYSIS: Multilevel models were used to estimate results, and to measure the size and significance of incremental changes. Missed values were treated by means of multiple imputations procedure. RESULTS: There were no differences between arms in terms of costs (p=0.093), while some differences were observed in terms of QALYs after 2 years of follow-up (p=0.028). PFI and CBI arms were dominated by the other two arms, PTI and UC. The differences between the PTI and the UC arms were very small in terms of QALYs, but significant in terms of healthcare costs (p=0.045). The total cost of the PTI arm (€2571, 95% CI €2317 to €2826) was lower than the cost in the UC arm (€2750, 95% CI €2506 to €2995), but this difference did not reach statistical significance. Base case estimates of the incremental cost per QALY indicate that the PTI strategy was the cost-effective option. CONCLUSIONS: The INDICA intervention designed for patients with T2DM and families is likely to be cost-effective from the public healthcare perspective. A cost-effectiveness model should explore this in the long term. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01657227.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relationADE10/00032en_US
dc.relationPI16/00769en_US
dc.relation.ispartofBMJ Openen_US
dc.sourceBMJ Open [ISSN 2044-6055], v. 12 (4), e058049, (2022)en_US
dc.subject531207 Sanidaden_US
dc.subject.otherDiabetes and endocrinologyen_US
dc.subject.otherHealth economicsen_US
dc.subject.otherHealth informaticsen_US
dc.subject.otherPrimary careen_US
dc.subject.otherQuality in health careen_US
dc.titleCost-effectiveness of multicomponent interventions in type 2 diabetes mellitus in a cluster randomised controlled trial: the INDICA studyen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058049en_US
dc.identifier.pmid35396305-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85127833761-
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-5626-8116-
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-1541-3989-
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-5833-6066-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.identifier.issue4-
dc.investigacionCiencias Sociales y Jurídicasen_US
dc.type2Artículoen_US
dc.utils.revisionen_US
dc.identifier.ulpgcen_US
dc.contributor.buulpgcBU-ECOen_US
dc.description.sjr1,059
dc.description.jcr2,9
dc.description.sjrqQ1
dc.description.jcrqQ2
dc.description.scieSCIE
dc.description.miaricds10,5
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextCon texto completo-
crisitem.author.deptGIR Economía de la salud y políticas públicas-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Métodos Cuantitativos en Economía y Gestión-
crisitem.author.deptGIR IUIBS: Diabetes y endocrinología aplicada-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Investigaciones Biomédicas y Sanitarias-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Ciencias Médicas y Quirúrgicas-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-5833-6066-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-7663-9308-
crisitem.author.parentorgDepartamento de Métodos Cuantitativos en Economía y Gestión-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Investigaciones Biomédicas y Sanitarias-
crisitem.author.fullNameRamallo Fariña, Yolanda-
crisitem.author.fullNameVallejo Torres, Laura-
crisitem.author.fullNameWägner, Anna Maria Claudia-
Colección:Artículos
Adobe PDF (631,46 kB)
Vista resumida

Citas SCOPUSTM   

2
actualizado el 10-nov-2024

Citas de WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

2
actualizado el 10-nov-2024

Visitas

104
actualizado el 19-oct-2024

Descargas

72
actualizado el 19-oct-2024

Google ScholarTM

Verifica

Altmetric


Comparte



Exporta metadatos



Los elementos en ULPGC accedaCRIS están protegidos por derechos de autor con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.