Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/114419
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez Suárez, Claudio Albertoen_US
dc.contributor.authorHernández De Luis, María Nairaen_US
dc.contributor.authorMariscal Crespo, María Isabelen_US
dc.contributor.authorCamacho Bejarano, Rafaelaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-25T13:36:03Z-
dc.date.available2022-04-25T13:36:03Z-
dc.date.issued2022en_US
dc.identifier.issn2047-3087en_US
dc.identifier.otherScopus-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10553/114419-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To develop and validate a tool to evaluate the NANDA International, Inc. diagnostic classification. Methods: The tool, EVALUAN-I, was validated in a non-probabilistic sample (N = 460) on Spanish Registered Nurses (September–December 2019) in two phases. First, design and construct the instrument in three steps: (1) literature review to define the construct focusing on the orientation toward nursing concepts and theoretical foundations, the level of scientific evidence, the structural configuration, the applicability, the nurses’ clinical reasoning skills, and the attitudes toward nursing diagnosis, (2) substantiation of the questionnaire items and design according to the criteria for a diagnostic classification, (3) expert test to establish the face validity and content validity. The second phase revolved around (4) conducting a pilot test and measuring the temporal stability (test-retest) and Cohen's kappa coefficient; assessing psychometric properties by measuring (5) reliability (internal consistency using Cronbach alpha and interfactor correlation) and (6) construct validity (exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis). The manuscript follows the STROBE checklist. The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee with registration number 2019-190-1. Findings: EVALUAN-I displayed moderate test-retest stability, adequate construct validity, and excellent reliability. The confirmatory factor analysis provided evidence about the configuration of EVALUAN-I in relation to nine analytical dimensions: clinical competence, nurses’ reasoning skills, attitudes towards nursing diagnosis, discipline's central concepts, classification's contents, physiopathological attributes, level of scientific evidence, diagnostic precision, and conceptual correspondence between terminologies. Conclusions: EVALUAN-I is a valid and reliable instrument, which can be used to improve the epistemological, normative, and intuitive configuration of NANDA International, Inc. in a structured, systematic manner. Implications for Nursing Practice: Comprehensive evaluation of NANDA International, Inc. in different clinical settings around the world using a validated instrument, like EVALUAN-I, would allow strengths and weaknesses to be identified and contribute to the classification's development and practical application.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relationCanary Islands Foundation for Health Research, FIISC, ENF-19/33en_US
dc.relation.ispartofInternational journal of nursing knowledgeen_US
dc.sourceInternational Journal of Nursing Knowledge[ISSN 2047-3087], v. 34 (1), p. 21-34, (Enero 2023)en_US
dc.subject32 Ciencias médicasen_US
dc.subject3201 Ciencias clínicasen_US
dc.subject.otherNursing Diagnosisen_US
dc.subject.otherNursing Methodology Researchen_US
dc.subject.otherPsychometricsen_US
dc.subject.otherStandardized Nursing Terminologyen_US
dc.subject.otherSurveys And Questionnairesen_US
dc.subject.otherValidation Studyen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of the NANDA International, Inc. diagnostic classification in Spain: Development and validation of the EVALUAN-I toolen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/2047-3095.12366en_US
dc.identifier.scopus85128184028-
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-6226-7374-
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-9720-3661-
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-0736-8695-
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-0716-5038-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid57213145259-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid57575765200-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid7801547819-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid54917531400-
dc.identifier.eissn2047-3095-
dc.description.lastpage34en_US
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.description.firstpage21en_US
dc.relation.volume34en_US
dc.investigacionCiencias de la Saluden_US
dc.type2Artículoen_US
dc.description.numberofpages14en_US
dc.utils.revisionen_US
dc.date.coverdateAbril 2022en_US
dc.identifier.ulpgcen_US
dc.contributor.buulpgcBU-MEDen_US
dc.description.sjr0,291
dc.description.jcr1,4
dc.description.sjrqQ2
dc.description.jcrqQ4
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextCon texto completo-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Enfermería-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-6226-7374-
crisitem.author.fullNameRodríguez Suárez, Claudio Alberto-
Appears in Collections:Artículos
Adobe PDF (234,68 kB)
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

1
checked on Nov 24, 2024

Page view(s)

87
checked on Jan 20, 2024

Download(s)

26
checked on Jan 20, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Share



Export metadata



Items in accedaCRIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.