Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/113790
Title: IMpower150 Final Exploratory Analyses for Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab and Chemotherapy in Key NSCLC Patient Subgroups With EGFR Mutations or Metastases in the Liver or Brain
Authors: Nogami, N
Barlesi, F
Socinski, MA
Reck, M
Thomas, CA
Cappuzzo, F
Mok, TSK
Finley, G
Aerts, JG
Orlandi, F
Moro-Sibilot, D
Jotte, RM
Stroyakovskiy, D
Villaruz, LC
Rodriguez Abreu, Delvys 
Lim, DWT
Merritt, D
Coleman, S
Lee, A
Shankar, G
Yu, W
Bara, I
Nishio, M
UNESCO Clasification: 32 Ciencias médicas
320713 Oncología
Keywords: Nonsquamous NSCLC
Atezolizumab
Bev-acizumab
IMpower150
EGFR mutation
Issue Date: 2022
Journal: Journal of Thoracic Oncology 
Abstract: Introduction: Final overall survival (OS) analyses are presented for EGFR mutations and liver or brain metastases subgroups in the phase 3 IMpower150 study (NCT02366143) evaluating atezolizumab plus bevacizumab plus carboplatin and paclitaxel (ABCP) or atezolizumab plus carboplatin and paclitaxel (ACP) versus bevacizumab plus carboplatin and paclitaxel (BCP). Methods: Overall, 1202 patients (intention-to-treat population) with chemotherapy-naive, metastatic, nonsquamous NSCLC were randomized to ABCP, ACP, or BCP. Patients with treated, stable brain metastases were permitted. OS was evaluated in EGFR mutations and baseline liver metastases subgroups; rate and time to development of new brain metastases were evaluated in the intention-to-treat patients. Results: At data cutoff (September 13, 2019; median follow-up, 39.3 mo), OS improvements were sustained with ABCP versus BCP in sensitizing EGFR mutations (all: hazard ratio [HR] = 0.60; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.31–1.14; previous tyrosine kinase inhibitor [TKI]: HR = 0.74; 95% CI: 0.38–1.46) and baseline liver metastases (HR = 0.68; 95% CI: 0.45–1.02) subgroups. ACP did not have survival benefit versus BCP in sensitizing EGFR mutations (all: HR = 1.0; 95% CI: 0.57–1.74; previous TKI: HR = 1.22; 95% CI: 0.68–2.22) or liver metastases (HR = 1.01; 95% CI: 0.68–1.51) subgroups. Overall, 100 patients (8.3%) developed new brain metastases. Although not formally evaluated, an improvement toward delayed time to development was found with ABCP versus BCP (HR = 0.68; 95% CI: 0.39–1.19). Conclusions: This final exploratory analysis revealed OS benefits for ABCP versus BCP in patients with sensitizing EGFR mutations, including those with previous TKI failures, and with liver metastases, although these results should be interpreted with caution. The impact of ABCP on delaying the development of new brain lesions requires further investigation.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/113790
ISSN: 1556-0864
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2021.09.014
Source: Journal of Thoracic Oncology [1556-0864], v. 17(2), p. 309-323 (Febrero 2022)
Appears in Collections:Artículos
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

135
checked on Aug 4, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

124
checked on Aug 4, 2024

Page view(s)

67
checked on Jun 1, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Share



Export metadata



Items in accedaCRIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.