Identificador persistente para citar o vincular este elemento: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/113543
Campo DC Valoridioma
dc.contributor.authorSamarasinghe, M. B.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSehested, J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWeisbjerg, M. R.en_US
dc.contributor.authorvan der Heide, M. E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorNørgaard, J. V.en_US
dc.contributor.authorVestergaard, M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHernández Castellano, Lorenzo Enriqueen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-25T08:54:06Z-
dc.date.available2022-01-25T08:54:06Z-
dc.date.issued2021en_US
dc.identifier.issn0022-0302en_US
dc.identifier.otherScopus-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10553/113543-
dc.description.abstractEmerging knowledge shows the importance of preweaning nutrition on programming the gastrointestinal microbiome and development of the gut barrier function. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of supplementing cow milk with either intact dried Ulva sp., Ascophyllum nodosum, or Saccharina latissima on growth performance and several gut health parameters of preweaning dairy calves. Forty male Holstein calves were selected based on birth weight (41 ± 4 kg) and plasma Brix percentage (≥8.7%) at d 2 of life. From d 2 to d 42 of life, the control calves (n = 10) were fed with cow milk (8 L/d) without seaweed supplementation, and the experimental calves were fed with cow milk (8 L/d) supplemented with either Ulva sp. (n = 10), A. nodosum (n = 10), or S. latissima (n = 10) at a concentration of 50 g/8 L of cow milk per day (i.e., 5% on a dry matter basis). Calves were weighed every week, and body weight gain and calf starter intake were monitored weekly. At d 42 ± 3 of life, calves were slaughtered. The organ weights and digesta pH from the reticulorumen, mid- and end small intestine, and mid-colon were recorded. A tissue sample (5 cm) collected from the mid-small intestine was analyzed for histomorphology. Digesta from the mid-small intestine and mid-colon were analyzed for lactobacilli, Escherichia coli, and Enterobacteriaceae, and short-chain fatty acid profile. Weight gain of the calves was not affected by seaweed supplementation. Proportional organ weights were not affected by seaweed supplementation except for reticulorumen weight, which was higher in calves fed Ulva sp. Both the mid-small intestinal and mid-colonic digesta populations of lactobacilli, Enterobacteriaceae, and E. coli, as well as the mid-small intestinal histomorphology in seaweed-supplemented calves were not different from control calves. However, acetic acid proportion in mid-colonic digesta was increased in calves fed Ulva sp. and A. nodosum, whereas butyric acid proportion was decreased compared with the control calves. Digesta pH in mid- and end small intestine and mid-colon were not affected, whereas ruminal pH was increased in calves fed Ulva sp. compared with the control calves. In conclusion, intact dried seaweed supplementation did not improve the growth or selected gut health parameters (i.e., histomorphology, digesta pH, bacteria, and short-chain fatty acids) in preweaning Holstein calves.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relationRYC2019-027064-Ien_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Dairy Scienceen_US
dc.sourceJournal of Dairy Science[ISSN 0022-0302], v. 104(11), p. 12117-12126, (Noviembre 2021)en_US
dc.subject3104 Producción Animalen_US
dc.subject310906 Nutriciónen_US
dc.subject.otherGut Healthen_US
dc.subject.otherIntact Seaweeden_US
dc.subject.otherPrebioticen_US
dc.subject.otherRuminanten_US
dc.titleFeeding milk supplemented with Ulva sp., Ascophyllum nodosum, or Saccharina latissima to preweaning dairy calves: Effects on growth, gut microbiota, gut histomorphology, and short-chain fatty acids in digestaen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/Articleen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3168/jds.2021-20680en_US
dc.identifier.scopus85113479756-
dc.contributor.orcidNO DATA-
dc.contributor.orcidNO DATA-
dc.contributor.orcidNO DATA-
dc.contributor.orcidNO DATA-
dc.contributor.orcidNO DATA-
dc.contributor.orcidNO DATA-
dc.contributor.orcidNO DATA-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid57208780539-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid7005164963-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid6701620596-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid57200958760-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid8899139200-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid57221553313-
dc.contributor.authorscopusid57217850167-
dc.identifier.eissn1525-3198-
dc.description.lastpage12126en_US
dc.description.firstpage12117en_US
dc.relation.volumeVol. 104, Nº 11en_US
dc.investigacionCiencias de la Saluden_US
dc.type2Artículoen_US
dc.description.numberofpages10en_US
dc.utils.revisionen_US
dc.date.coverdateNoviembre, 2021en_US
dc.identifier.ulpgcen_US
dc.contributor.buulpgcBU-VETen_US
dc.description.sjr1,215
dc.description.jcr4,225
dc.description.sjrqQ1
dc.description.jcrqQ1
dc.description.scieSCIE
dc.description.miaricds11,0
item.fulltextCon texto completo-
item.grantfulltextopen-
crisitem.author.deptGIR IUSA-ONEHEALTH 4. Producción y Biotecnología Animal-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Sanidad Animal y Seguridad Alimentaria-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Patología Animal, Producción Animal, Bromatología y Tecnología de Los Alimentos-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-2729-0434-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Sanidad Animal y Seguridad Alimentaria-
crisitem.author.fullNameHernández Castellano, Lorenzo Enrique-
Colección:Artículos
Adobe PDF (277,06 kB)
Vista resumida

Citas SCOPUSTM   

8
actualizado el 14-abr-2024

Visitas

41
actualizado el 10-feb-2024

Descargas

140
actualizado el 10-feb-2024

Google ScholarTM

Verifica

Altmetric


Comparte



Exporta metadatos



Los elementos en ULPGC accedaCRIS están protegidos por derechos de autor con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.