Identificador persistente para citar o vincular este elemento: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/108030
Título: OLA strategy for ARDS: Its effect on mortality depends on achieved recruitment (PaO2/FiO2) and mechanical power. Systematic review and meta-analysis with meta-regression
Otros títulos: Estrategia OLA para el SDRA: su efecto en la mortalidad depende del reclutamiento alcanzado (PaO2/FiO2) y la potencia mecánica. Revisión sistemática y metaanálisis con metarregresión
Autores/as: Modesto i Alapont, V.
Medina Villanueva, A.
del Villar Guerra, P.
Camilo, C.
Fernández Ureña, Sergio 
Gordo-Vidal, F.
Khemani, R.
Clasificación UNESCO: 32 Ciencias médicas
320508 Enfermedades pulmonares
241117 Fisiología de la respiración
Palabras clave: Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Lung Recruitment
Mechanical Power
Open Lung
Positive End-Expiratory Pressure
Fecha de publicación: 2021
Publicación seriada: Medicina Intensiva 
Resumen: Objective: The “Open Lung Approach” (OLA), that includes high levels of positive end-expiratory pressure coupled with limited tidal volumes, is considered optimal for adult patients with ARDS. However, many previous meta-analyses have shown only marginal benefits of OLA on mortality but with statistical heterogeneity. It is crucial to identify the most likely moderators of this effect. To determine the effect of OLA strategy on mortality of ventilated ARDS patients. We hypothesized that the degree of recruitment achieved in the control group (PaO2/FiO2 ratio on day 3 of ventilation), and the difference in Mechanical Power (MP) or Driving Pressure (DP) between experimental and control groups will be the most likely sources of heterogeneity. Design: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis was performed according to PRISMA statement and registered in PROSPERO database. We searched only for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). GRADE guidelines were used for rating the quality of evidence. Publication bias was assessed. For the Meta-analysis, we used a Random Effects Model. Sources of heterogeneity were explored with Meta-Regression, using a priori proposed set of possible moderators. For model comparison, Akaike's Information Criterion with the finite sample correction (AICc) was used. Setting: Not applicable. Patients: Fourteen RCTs were included in the study. Interventions: Not applicable. Main variables of interest: Not applicable. Results: Evidence of publication bias was detected, and quality of evidence was downgraded. Pooled analysis did not show a significant difference in the 28-day mortality between OLA strategy and control groups. Overall risk of bias was low. The analysis detected statistical heterogeneity. The two “best” explicative meta-regression models were those that used control PaO2/FiO2 on day 3 and difference in MP between experimental and control groups. The DP and MP models were highly correlated. Conclusions: There is no clear benefit of OLA strategy on mortality of ARDS patients, with significant heterogeneity among RCTs. Mortality effect of OLA is mediated by lung recruitment and mechanical power.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/108030
ISSN: 0210-5691
DOI: 10.1016/j.medin.2021.03.016
Fuente: Medicina Intensiva [ISSN 0210-5691], v. 45(9), p. 516-531, (Diciembre 2021)
Colección:Artículos
Vista completa

Google ScholarTM

Verifica

Altmetric


Comparte



Exporta metadatos



Los elementos en ULPGC accedaCRIS están protegidos por derechos de autor con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.