Identificador persistente para citar o vincular este elemento: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/106709
Campo DC Valoridioma
dc.contributor.authorRiera, R.en_US
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez, R.A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHerrera, A.M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorDelgado, J.D.en_US
dc.contributor.authorFath, B.D.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-12T10:30:05Z-
dc.date.available2021-04-12T10:30:05Z-
dc.date.issued2018en_US
dc.identifier.issn0308-0188en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10553/106709-
dc.description.abstractMainstream ecological thought is explored in three sections: (i) Epistemological traits. Given the typical scientific development and the necessity of preserving our intellectual heritage, the conservatism outlined in (i) is cyclical, so its stages are graphically summarized. (ii) Methodological benchmarks antithetically derived from (i), in order to get faster advancement consistent with the growing environmental challenges which spur ecological development. (iii) The renaissance of an old paradigm. This section exposes the misunderstanding of the physical concept of equilibrium by the mainstream ecological thought; this explains its current state. Consequently, section (iii) also summarizes the evolution of a recent set of proposals (organic biophysics of ecosystems) that rescues the foundational paradigm of ecosystem ecology based on physics, neglected by the mainstream thought before producing its most valuable results. We highlight that the main problems emerge from the weakness of integration between ecology, physics and epistemology, and spurious links between ecology and neoclassical economics.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofInterdisciplinary Science Reviewsen_US
dc.sourceInterdisciplinary Science Reviews [ISSN 0308-0188], v. 43 (2), p. 175-191en_US
dc.subject7205 Filosofía de la cienciaen_US
dc.subject24 Ciencias de la vidaen_US
dc.subject.otherEcologyen_US
dc.subject.otherEcological state equationen_US
dc.subject.otherOrganic biophysics of ecosystems (OBEC)en_US
dc.subject.otherEpistemologyen_US
dc.subject.otherEvolution of scienceen_US
dc.subject.otherInterdisciplinary researchen_US
dc.subject.otherPhysicsen_US
dc.subject.otherScientific specializationen_US
dc.titleEndorheic currents in ecology: an example of the effects from scientific specialization and interdisciplinary isolationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/03080188.2017.1371480en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85017415757-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.contributor.orcid#NODATA#-
dc.description.lastpage191en_US
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.description.firstpage175en_US
dc.relation.volume43en_US
dc.investigacionCienciasen_US
dc.identifier.external47301295-
dc.description.numberofpages17en_US
dc.utils.revisionen_US
dc.identifier.ulpgcNoen_US
dc.contributor.buulpgcBU-BASen_US
dc.description.sjr0,139
dc.description.jcr0,14
dc.description.sjrqQ3
dc.description.jcrqQ4
dc.description.scieSCIE
dc.description.ssciSSCI
dc.description.erihplusERIH PLUS
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextSin texto completo-
crisitem.author.deptGIR ECOAQUA: Biodiversidad y Conservación-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Investigación en Acuicultura Sostenible y Ec-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Biología-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-1264-1625-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Investigación en Acuicultura Sostenible y Ec-
crisitem.author.fullNameRiera Elena, Rodrigo-
Colección:Artículos
Vista resumida

Google ScholarTM

Verifica

Altmetric


Comparte



Exporta metadatos



Los elementos en ULPGC accedaCRIS están protegidos por derechos de autor con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.