Identificador persistente para citar o vincular este elemento: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/105872
Campo DC Valoridioma
dc.contributor.authorMedina Castellano, M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorAmaro Acosta, A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorQuevedo Gutiérrez, Eduardo Gregorioen_US
dc.contributor.authorMarrero Callicó, Gustavo Ivánen_US
dc.contributor.authorSantana Del Pino, Ángeloen_US
dc.contributor.authorLaseca Modrego, M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGarcía Hernández, J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMartín Martínez, Aliciaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-17T17:10:09Z-
dc.date.available2021-03-17T17:10:09Z-
dc.date.issued2020en_US
dc.identifier.issn0960-7692en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10553/105872-
dc.description.abstractObjectives Validate in a reference cancer centre the ADNEX model, focusing it as an efficient tool that customises the pre‐surgical approach of patients with suspicion of malignant ovarian tumour. Methods Prospective study, in a national health tertiary hospital, between 2018‐20. Patients scanned on suspicion of malignant ovarian tumour, methodology defined by IOTA, certified explorer. IOTA ADNEX model variables were analysed, adding Doppler colour score. A threshold of 20% was considered, non‐adjusted odd‐ratio value is highly statistically significant (99.667) with a 95% CI. P < 0.05 considered significant. Those whose risk >20% were referred to our oncology gynecology unit. Risks 10‐20% were scheduled for surgery in a general gynecology theatre, with intraoperative biopsy, counting on skilled gynecologic oncologist on alert. Results Malignity rate 46%. According to malignant relative risk, there was a good correlation in II‐IV stage (69%) and borderline (61.9%). The worse was given in metastasis (22.2%). The cyst subtype mostly associated with II‐IV tumour is the solid and multilocular solid, being for borderline tumour, multilocular solid and unilocular solid. Of 400 patients referred, were excluded malignancy risk 10% and who have no surgical indication, leaving 272 patients. Only 3 false‐negatives were found in the group considered benign with surgical criteria, 3/147 (98% accuracy), all of them borderline tumours with a priori risk of 15‐20% so intraoperative biopsy and optimal oncological surgery were performed in the moment. In malignant group, 33 false‐positives were found (73.6% accuracy) which were: benign solid tumours (fibroma), non‐gynecological malignant/benign tumours, inflammatory necrosis. Conclusions ADNEX model is essential for customised treatment of adnexal tumours in order to efficiency and schedule oncological surgery. The best assessment of malignancy occurs in stage II‐IV tumour and borderline tumour. The worst correlation was found in metastasis, which are assessed by Doppler colour score, abdominal spread signs and patient's clinical data.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofUltrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecologyen_US
dc.sourceUltrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology [ISSN 0960-7692], v. 56 (S1), p. 332-332, (VP61.05), (Octubre 2020)en_US
dc.subject3201 Ciencias clínicasen_US
dc.titleEfficient and customised use of IOTA ADNEX model as a clinical management tool in a tailor‐made treatment of adnexal tumour suspected of malignancy (VP61.05)en_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleen_US
dc.relation.conferenceVirtual World Congress on Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG)es
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/uog.23346en_US
dc.description.lastpage332en_US
dc.identifier.issueS1-
dc.description.firstpage332en_US
dc.relation.volume56en_US
dc.investigacionCiencias de la Saluden_US
dc.type2Artículoen_US
dc.utils.revisionen_US
dc.date.coverdateOctubre 2020en_US
dc.identifier.ulpgcen_US
dc.contributor.buulpgcBU-MEDen_US
dc.description.sjr3,202
dc.description.jcr7,299
dc.description.sjrqQ1
dc.description.jcrqQ1
dc.description.scieSCIE
item.fulltextCon texto completo-
item.grantfulltextopen-
crisitem.event.eventsstartdate16-10-2020-
crisitem.event.eventsenddate18-10-2020-
crisitem.author.deptGIR IUMA: Diseño de Sistemas Electrónicos Integrados para el procesamiento de datos-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Microelectrónica Aplicada-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Matemáticas-
crisitem.author.deptGIR IUMA: Diseño de Sistemas Electrónicos Integrados para el procesamiento de datos-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Microelectrónica Aplicada-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Ingeniería Electrónica y Automática-
crisitem.author.deptGIR Estadística-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Matemáticas-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Ciencias Médicas y Quirúrgicas-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-5415-3446-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-3784-5504-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-6513-4814-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-4237-6378-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Microelectrónica Aplicada-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Microelectrónica Aplicada-
crisitem.author.parentorgDepartamento de Matemáticas-
crisitem.author.fullNameQuevedo Gutiérrez, Eduardo Gregorio-
crisitem.author.fullNameMarrero Callicó, Gustavo Iván-
crisitem.author.fullNameSantana Del Pino, Ángelo-
crisitem.author.fullNameMartín Martínez, Alicia-
Colección:Artículos
miniatura
pdf
Adobe PDF (46,1 kB)
Vista resumida

Google ScholarTM

Verifica

Altmetric


Comparte



Exporta metadatos



Los elementos en ULPGC accedaCRIS están protegidos por derechos de autor con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.