Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/76250
Title: Postmenopausal women with Colles' fracture have lower values of bone mineral density than controls as measured by quantitative ultrasound and densitometry
Authors: Sosa Henríquez, Manuel José 
Saavedra, P
del Pino-Montes, J
Alegre, J
Perez-Cano, R
Guerra, GMD
Diaz-Curiel, M
Valero, C
Munoz-Torres, M
Torrijos, A
Mosquera, J
Gomez-Alonso, C
UNESCO Clasification: 32 Ciencias médicas
320714 Osteopatología
Keywords: Distal Forearm Fracture
Vertebral Fractures
Discrimination
Osteoporosis
Population
Precision
Wrist
Colles' Fracture
Forearm
Distal Radius
Quantitative Ultrasound
Bone Mineral Density (Bmd)
Issue Date: 2005
Journal: Journal of Clinical Densitometry 
Abstract: Measurement of ultrasonographic parameters provides information concerning not only bone density but also bone architecture. We investigated the usefulness of ultrasonographic parameters and bone mineral density (BMD) to evaluate the probability of Colles' fracture. Two-hundred eighty-nine Postmenopausal women (62.3 +/- 8.7 yr) with (n = 76) and without (n = 213) Colles' fracture were studied. BMD of lumbar spine and proximal femur was evaluated in all women by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and speed of sound (SOS). broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA), and stiffness in the calcaneus were measured by a Sahara ultrasonometer (Hologic). Patients suffering from Colles' fracture had lower values of BMD adjusted by height at the lumbar spine, L2-L4 (0.797 g/cm(2) vs 0.860 g/cm(2)), femoral neck (0.685 g/cm(2) vs 0.712 g/cm(2)), SOS (1518 m/sg vs 1525 m/sg), and stiffness (74.6 vs 77.7) (p < 0.05). Nevertheless, BUA values were similar in both groups. After stepwise logistic regression analysis, the area found under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves was 0.60 for L2L4 and 0.63 for a formula combining L2L4 and height.Our data suggest that patients suffering from Colles' fracture have lower values of BMD by DXA, SOS, and stiffness. However, the ability of these techniques to discriminate is low because the values for the area under ROC curve are 0.60 for L2-L4 and 0.63 for a formula derived of the combination of L2-L4 and height.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/76250
ISSN: 1094-6950
Source: Journal Of Clinical Densitometry [ISSN 1094-6950], v. 8 (4), p. 430-435, (Invierno 2005)
Appears in Collections:Artículos
Show full item record

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

6
checked on Jan 17, 2021

Page view(s)

42
checked on Jan 18, 2021

Google ScholarTM

Check


Share



Export metadata



Items in accedaCRIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.