Identificador persistente para citar o vincular este elemento: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/47864
Campo DC Valoridioma
dc.contributor.authorCastro, N.
dc.contributor.authorCapote, J.
dc.contributor.authorBruckmaier, R. M.
dc.contributor.authorArgüello, A.
dc.contributor.otherCastro, Noemi
dc.contributor.otherArguello, Anastasio
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-23T17:03:35Z-
dc.date.available2018-11-23T17:03:35Z-
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.issn0971-2119
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10553/47864-
dc.description.abstractColostrum feeding in small ruminants is crucial during the first hours after birth due to the lack of Ig transfer during pregnancy via the placenta. In addition the immature immune system of the neonate is slow to produce its own Ig during the first weeks of life. Colostrogenesis, i.e. the transfer of Ig from blood into mammary secretions, starts several weeks prepartum. In goat plasma, immunoglobulin G (IgG) concentration decreases by around 38% from the third month of gestation until partum, which coincides with the dry period. Thus, management during the dry period is crucial for the course of colostrogenesis. The colostrum synthesis is determined by the nutrition during the prepartum period, but the transfer of Ig is obviously independent of nutritional influences. The administration of conjugated linoleic acid during the dry period to dairy goats causes a less pronounced decrease of blood plasma IgG concentration (6%) but it did not change colostral IgG levels. In cattle, IgG1 is transported from blood into colostrum by an IgG1 specific receptor located on the surface of alveolar epithelial cells during colostrogenesis, and this is most likely similar in small ruminants. Via inactivation of this receptor, the Ig transfer is downregulated by increasing prolactin (PRL) during lactogenesis. It was recently observed in goats treated with PGF2 alpha, in order to induce parturition, lower colostrum IgG concentrations occurred concomitantly with an earlier increase of plasma PRL as compared to untreated animals. The effect of litter size and number of lactations on colostral IgG concentration in small ruminants has not been made fully clear until now most likely due to the different breeds used in the published studies.
dc.publisher0971-2119
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Applied Animal Research
dc.sourceJournal of Applied Animal Research[ISSN 0971-2119],v. 39, p. 85-93
dc.subject.otherConjugated Linoleic-Acid
dc.subject.otherSerum Immunoglobulin Concentrations
dc.subject.otherColostrum Production
dc.subject.otherLate Pregnancy
dc.subject.otherChitotriosidase Activity
dc.subject.otherHormonal Responses
dc.subject.otherPassive Transfer
dc.subject.otherFinal Stages
dc.subject.other1St Milking
dc.subject.otherGoat Kids
dc.titleManagement effects on colostrogenesis in small ruminants: A review
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/reviewes
dc.typeArticlees
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/09712119.2011.581625
dc.identifier.scopus80053502849
dc.identifier.isi000296276700001
dcterms.isPartOfJournal Of Applied Animal Research
dcterms.sourceJournal Of Applied Animal Research[ISSN 0971-2119],v. 39 (2), p. 85-93
dc.contributor.authorscopusid57200208399
dc.contributor.authorscopusid6602424338
dc.contributor.authorscopusid7006788444
dc.contributor.authorscopusid6701710018
dc.description.lastpage93
dc.description.firstpage85
dc.relation.volume39
dc.type2Reseñaes
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000296276700001
dc.contributor.daisngid330531
dc.contributor.daisngid383596
dc.contributor.daisngid41645
dc.contributor.daisngid298051
dc.identifier.investigatorRIDF-9621-2016
dc.identifier.investigatorRIDB-4493-2010
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Castro, N
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Capote, J
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Bruckmaier, RM
dc.contributor.wosstandardWOS:Arguello, A
dc.date.coverdateJunio 2011
dc.identifier.ulpgces
dc.description.sjr0,198
dc.description.jcr0,4
dc.description.sjrqQ3
dc.description.jcrqQ3
dc.description.scieSCIE
item.fulltextSin texto completo-
item.grantfulltextnone-
crisitem.author.deptGIR IUSA-ONEHEALTH 4. Producción y Biotecnología Animal-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Sanidad Animal y Seguridad Alimentaria-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Patología Animal, Producción Animal, Bromatología y Tecnología de Los Alimentos-
crisitem.author.deptGIR IUSA-ONEHEALTH 4. Producción y Biotecnología Animal-
crisitem.author.deptIU de Sanidad Animal y Seguridad Alimentaria-
crisitem.author.deptDepartamento de Patología Animal, Producción Animal, Bromatología y Tecnología de Los Alimentos-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-3026-2031-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-4426-0678-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Sanidad Animal y Seguridad Alimentaria-
crisitem.author.parentorgIU de Sanidad Animal y Seguridad Alimentaria-
crisitem.author.fullNameCastro Navarro, Noemí-
crisitem.author.fullNameCapote Álvarez, Juan Francisco-
crisitem.author.fullNameArgüello Henríquez, Anastasio-
Colección:Reseña
Vista resumida

Citas SCOPUSTM   

58
actualizado el 21-abr-2024

Citas de WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

55
actualizado el 25-feb-2024

Visitas

33
actualizado el 17-feb-2024

Google ScholarTM

Verifica

Altmetric


Comparte



Exporta metadatos



Los elementos en ULPGC accedaCRIS están protegidos por derechos de autor con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.