Identificador persistente para citar o vincular este elemento: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/45632
Título: Processes of what models?
Autores/as: Martín, Ricardo Muñz 
Palabras clave: Network
Fecha de publicación: 2016
Editor/a: 2211-3711
Publicación seriada: Translation Spaces(Netherland) 
Resumen: In a recent article, Chesterman (2013) elaborates on Toury's (2012) distinction between `translation acts' (cognitive process) and `translation events'(sociological process), and adds a third, superordinate level of `translation practices' (cultural, historical, anthropological). Such successively nested models seem intuitively correct when applied to categorizing different approaches within translation studies. However, when used within cognitive and psycholinguistic approaches, such categories are found to lead to flawed reasoning. When Chesterman's proposal is considered from perspectives such as the level of abstraction and the dynamicity of the models, many examples provided as illustration turn out to be misleading. The bulk of such errors points to an implicit notion of cognition which is contested by a growing number of researchers within translation process research: a view of thought as an internal, neutral, and logical brain process, mainly focused on problem-solving.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10553/45632
ISSN: 2211-3711
DOI: 10.1075/ts.5.1.08mun
Fuente: Translation Spaces(Netherland)[ISSN 2211-3711],v. 5, p. 145-161
Colección:Reseña
Vista completa

Google ScholarTM

Verifica

Altmetric


Comparte



Exporta metadatos



Los elementos en ULPGC accedaCRIS están protegidos por derechos de autor con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.